Cited by 56

Cost Pass-Through of the EU Emissions Allowances: Examining the European Petroleum Markets

Alexeeva-Talebi, Victoria·2011·Energy Economics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.029

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PTRs in non-mineral branches vary between 24% (other glass) and >60% (hollow glass).

    “Within the non-mineral branches, Alexeeva-Talebi (Citation2010) estimates that PTRs vary between 24% (other glass) and >60% (hollow glass).”

    From Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms' competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature (2019) · cites this paper as Alexeeva-Talebi, 2010

    The Introduction (p. 6) says Alexeeva-Talebi (2010) studied cost pass-through in energy-intensive sectors, but this paper's own results concern petroleum refining. Searches for hollow glass, other glass, and the 24% and >60% figures found no passage reporting the claimed rates. The copy therefore does not establish those figures or explicitly attribute them to the 2010 work. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Alberola, E. and J. Chevallier (forthcoming), European Carbon Prices and Banking Restrictions: Evidence from Phase I (2005-2007), The Energy Journal .
  2. Doyle, J.J. and K. Samphantharak (2008), $2.00 Gas! Studying the effects of a gas tax moratorium, Journal of Public Economics 92 (3/4), 869-884.
  3. Ellerman, A. and B. Buchner (2008), Over-Allocation or Abatement? A Preliminary Analysis of the EU ETS Based on the 2005-06 Emissions Data, Environmental and Resource Economics 41(2), 267-287.
  4. Enders, W (2004), Applied Econometric Time Series , Second Edition, Wiley.
  5. Engle, R.F. and C.W.J. Granger (1987), Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing, Econometrica 55(2), 251-276.
  6. Frey, G. and M. Manera (2007), Econometric Models of Asymmetric Price Transmission, Journal of Economic Surveys 21 (2), 349-415.
  7. Galeotti, M., Lanza, A. and M. Manera (2003), Rockets and Feathers Revisited: An International Comparison on European Gasoline Markets, Energy Economics 25(2), 175-190.
  8. Gonzalo, J. (1994), Five Alternative Methods of Estimating Long-Run Equilibrium Relationships, Journal of Econometrics 60(1-2), 203-233.
  9. Hamilton, J.D. (1994), Time Series Analysis , Princeton University Press.
  10. Johansen, S. (1988), Statistical Analysis of Cointegrating Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231-254.
  11. Johansen, S. and K. Juselius (1990), Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration - With Applications to the Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52(2), 169-210.
  12. Johansen, S. (1995), Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models , Oxford University Press.
  13. Kaufmann, R.K. and C.J. Cleveland (2001), Oil Production in the Lower 48 States: Economic, Geological, and Institutional Determinants, The Energy Journal 22(1), 27-49.
  14. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P. and Y. Shin (1992), Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationary against the Alternative of a Unit Root, Journal of Econometrics 54(1-3), 159-178.
  15. Lütkepohl, H. and H.-E. Reimers (1992), Impulse Response Analysis of Cointegrated Systems, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 16(1), 53-78.
  16. Meyer, J. and S.v. Cramon-Taubadel (2004), Asymmetric Price Transmission: A Survey, Journal of Agricultural Economics 55(3), 581-611.
  17. Phillips, P.C.B. and P. Perron (1988), Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression, Biometrika 75(2), 335-346.
  18. Sijm, J., Neuhoff, K. and Y. Chen (2006b), CO 2 Cost Pass-Through and Windfall Profits in the Power Sector, Climate Policy 6(1), 49-72.
  19. Welsch, H. (2008), Armington Elasticities for Energy Policy Modeling: Evidence From Four European Countries, Energy Economics 30(5), 2252-2264.
  20. Wlazlowski, S.S. (2007), Crude Oil - End-Product Linkages in the European Petroleum Markets, OPEC Review 2, Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.
  21. Zachmann, G. and C. v. Hirschhausen (2008), First Evidence of Asymmetric Cost Pass-Through of EU Emissions Allowances: Examining Wholesale Electricity Prices in Germany, Economics Letters 99(3), 465-469.

Authors
Alexeeva-Talebi, V.
Venue
Energy Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
33
Pages
S75-S83
ISSN
0140-9883
Cited by
56
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review