The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Financial markets, innovations and cleaner energy production in OECD countries
Abstract
Using a large sample of 25 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, we provide evidence that the growth of equity and credit markets promotes cleaner energy (biomass renewable energy, non biomass renewable energy, and total bio and non-bio renewable energy) production in those countries. We also find that the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC) adversely affects the production of cleaner energy. Our results are robust to alternative definitions of financial market development, cleaner energy, and controlling for the effect of government subsidy on cleaner energy. By supporting the demand-induced supply of cleaner energy, we demonstrate that the positive and significant effect of financial market development (FMD) on cleaner energy is stronger in countries with higher growth in carbon intensity and a lower availability of fossil fuels than otherwise. Our results also support the argument that financing uncertain projects such as those that produce cleaner energy should be greater in countries with a higher innovation culture than those where financial markets are already accustomed to undertaking risky investments. The overall results are also robust under the conditions of short-run and long-run homogeneity and the cross-sectional dependence in the sample. Policy implications are also provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A contribution to the theory of economic growth
Solow, R. M. (1956) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884513 · Cited by 24,483
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
Robust Inference With Multiway Clustering
Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B., & Miller, D. L. (2011) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/jbes.2010.07136 · Cited by 3,203
Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?
FANG, V. W., TIAN, X., & TICE, S. (2014) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12187 · Cited by 1,339
Cited by
Ganda, F. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.235 · Cited by 518
Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., & Khan, D. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2615 · Cited by 508
Green Finance and Renewable Energy: A Worldwide Evidence
Alharbi, S., Al Mamun, M., Sabri, B., & Rizvi, S. R. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4315725 · Cited by 353
Self-citationParamati, S. R., Mo, D., & Huang, R. (2021) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2020.101794 · Cited by 328
Wu, Y., & Huang, S. (2022) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106158 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Al Mamun, M., Sohag, K., Shahbaz, M., & Hammoudeh, S.
- Venue
- Energy Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 236-254
- ISSN
- 0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899286522
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Financial markets, innovations and cleaner energy production in OECD countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.011
- The paper
- Al Mamun, M., Sohag, K., Shahbaz, M., & Hammoudeh, S. (2018). Financial markets, innovations and cleaner energy production in OECD countries. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.