The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does stringent environmental regulation lead to a carbon haven effect? Evidence from carbon-intensive industries in China
Abstract
This paper examines the pollution haven effect from the perspective of carbon emission. Based on a theoretical analysis of how stringent environmental regulation affects carbon emission transfer within regions, we put forward the concept of carbon heaven effect (CHE) and explore the mechanism that environmental regulation influences carbon emissions through investment. We employ a mediating effect model to empirically study the existence of CHE in terms of per capita carbon emission, carbon emission intensity, and the proportion of regional carbon emission to the national emission. Further, the impacts of environmental regulation on the scale expansion and employment of carbon-intensive industries (CIIs) are investigated. Our results indicate that: (1) The CHE does exist in China, i.e., different environmental regulation intensities among different areas have indeed caused carbon emission transfer within regions; (2) The impact of environmental regulation on carbon emissions includes the total effect of emission reduction and the indirect effect of carbon-intensive industrial investment transfer; (3) The scale and employment of CIIs in regions with stringent environmental regulation have been constrained, while the regions with weaker environmental regulation become the havens for CIIs development; (4) Giving that the emission reduction targets were assigned and implemented at the provincial level since 2006, we further examine the effects of this constrain policy on CHE, and find that the impacts of environmental regulation on local carbon emission has strengthened.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
UNMASKING THE POLLUTION HAVEN EFFECT*
Levinson, A., & Taylor, M. S. (2008) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00478.x · Cited by 1,112
Different methods for testing moderated mediation models: competitors or backups?
WEN, Z., & YE, B. (2014) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2014.00714 · Cited by 363
Cited by
Does China's regional emission trading scheme lead to carbon leakage? Evidence from conglomerates
He, L.-Y., & Chen, K.-X. (2023) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113481 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, X., Liu, C., Sun, C., & Yang, M.
- Venue
- Energy Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 86
- Pages
- 104631
- ISSN
- 0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2998242558
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does stringent environmental regulation lead to a carbon haven effect? Evidence from carbon-intensive industries in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104631
- The paper
- Zhao, X., Liu, C., Sun, C., & Yang, M. (2020). Does stringent environmental regulation lead to a carbon haven effect? Evidence from carbon-intensive industries in China. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104631
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.