Cited by 1,112Global trade and economicsEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthClimate Change Policy and Economics

UNMASKING THE POLLUTION HAVEN EFFECT*

Open access
Levinson, Arik, Taylor, M. Scott·2008·International Economic Review

Abstract

We use theory and empirics to examine the effect of environmental regulations on trade flows. A simple model demonstrates how unobserved heterogeneity, endogeneity, and aggregation issues bias standard measurements of this relationship. A reduced‐form estimate of the model, using data on U.S. regulations and trade with Canada and Mexico for 130 manufacturing industries from 1977 to 1986, indicates that industries whose abatement costs increased most experienced the largest increases in net imports. For the average industry, the change in net imports we ascribe to regulatory costs amounting to 10% of the total increase in trade volume over the period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00478.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Brunnermeier, Smita and Arik Levinson. 2004. "Examining the Evidence on Environmental Regulations and Industry Location," Journal of the Environment and Development, 13(1): 6-41.
  2. Copeland, Brian R. and M. Scott Taylor. 2003. Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence. Princeton University Press.
  3. Copeland, Brian R. and M. Scott Taylor. 2004. "Trade, Growth, and the Environment" Journal of Economic Literature. 42(1): 7-71.
  4. Davidson, R. and MacKinnon, J. 1993 Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Ederington, Josh and Jenny Minier. 2003. "Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier? An Empirical Analysis" Canadian Journal of Economics 36(1): 137-154.
  6. Ederington, Josh, Arik Levinson, and Jenny Minier. 2004. "Footloose and Pollution-free." Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming.
  7. Frankel, J.A. and D. Romer. "Does Trade cause Growth", American Economic Review, 89: 379- 99, 1999.
  8. Greenstone, Michael. 2002. "The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Acts and the Census of Manufactures," Journal of Political Economy 110(6): 1175-219.
  9. Grossman, Gene M. and Alan B. Krueger. 1993. "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement." in The Mexico-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, Peter M Garber, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reprinted in Robert Percival, ed., Law and the Environment: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, forthcoming.
  10. Jaffe, Adam B., Steven R. Peterson, Paul R. Portney, and Robert N. Stavins. 1995. "Environmental Regulations and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What does the Evidence Tell Us?" Journal of Economic Literature 33(1):132-63.
  11. Kalt, J.P. "The Impact of Domestic Environmental Regulatory Policies on U.S. International Competitiveness", in Spence, A.M. and Hazard, Heather, A., ed. International Competitiveness, Cambridge, Mass: Harper and Row, Ballinger, 1988, p. 221-262.
  12. Leamer, Edward E. and James Levinsohn, "International Trade Theory: The Evidence." in Gene M. Grossman and Kenneth Rogoff, eds. Handbook of International Economics vol. 3. New York : North Holland, 1996.
  13. List, John A., W. Warren McHone, Daniel L. Millimet and Per G. Fredriksson. 2004. "Effects of Environmental Regulations on Manufacturing Plant Births: Evidence from a Propensity Score Matching Estimator," Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming.
  14. Trefler, Daniel. 1993. "Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection: An Econometric Study of U.S. Import Policy" Journal of Political Economy 101(1) 138-160.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levinson, A., & Taylor, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Taylor, M. Scott
Venue
International Economic Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
223-254
ISSN
  • 0020-6598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2354
OpenAlex
W2119106412
Cited by
1,112
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 49
FWCI
83.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
pollution haven effect, environmental regulation, trade flows, regulatory costs, abatement costs, unobserved heterogeneity, endogeneity, aggregation bias, manufacturing industry, net imports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review