The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co-movements and spillovers of oil and renewable firms under extreme conditions: New evidence from negative WTI prices during COVID-19
Open accessAbstract
We test for the existence of volatility spillovers and co-movements among energy-focused corporations during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, inclusive of the April 2020 events where West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil future prices became negative. Employing the spillover index approach of Diebold and Yilmaz (2012); as well as developing a DCC-FIGARCH conditional correlation framework and using estimated spillover indices built on a generalised vector autoregressive framework in which forecast-error variance decompositions are invariant to the variable ordering, we examine the sectoral transmission mechanisms of volatility shocks and contagion throughout the energy sector. Among several results, we find positive and economically meaningful spillovers from falling oil prices to both renewable energy and coal markets. However, this result is only found for the narrow portion of our sample surrounding the negative WTI event. We interpret our results being directly attributed to a sharp drop in global oil, gas and coal demand, rather than because of a sudden increase in oil supply. While investors observed the US fracking industry losing market share to coal, they also viewed renewables as more reliable mechanism to generate long-term, stable and low-cost supply.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sims, C. A. (1980) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912017 · Cited by 12,727
Engle, R. (2002) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/073500102288618487 · Cited by 7,133
Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers
Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2012) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006 · Cited by 5,756
No Contagion, Only Interdependence: Measuring Stock Market Comovements
Forbes, K. J., & Rigobon, R. (2002) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00494 · Cited by 4,615
Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues
Cont, R. (2001) · Quantitative Finance · doi:10.1080/713665670 · Cited by 3,486
A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model
Ding, Z., Granger, C. W. J., & Engle, R. F. (1993) · Journal of Empirical Finance · doi:10.1016/0927-5398(93)90006-d · Cited by 3,250
Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2009) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x · Cited by 3,075
Correlations in price changes and volatility across international stock markets
Hamao, Y., Masulis, R. W., & Ng, V. (1990) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/3.2.281 · Cited by 1,926
COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research
Goodell, J. W. (2020) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2020.101512 · Cited by 1,592
Self-citationJONES, C. M., & KAUL, G. (1996) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb02691.x · Cited by 1,550
Metadata
- Authors
- Corbet, S., Goodell, J. W., & Günay, S.
- Venue
- Energy Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 92
- Pages
- 104978
- ISSN
- 0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093516516
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 40.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Co-movements and spillovers of oil and renewable firms under extreme conditions: New evidence from negative WTI prices during COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104978
- The paper
- Corbet, S., Goodell, J. W., & Günay, S. (2020). Co-movements and spillovers of oil and renewable firms under extreme conditions: New evidence from negative WTI prices during COVID-19. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104978
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.