Cited by 206Sustainable Finance and Green BondsCredit Risk and Financial RegulationsClimate Change Policy and Economics

This changes everything: Climate shocks and sovereign bonds⁎

Open access
Cevik, Serhan, Jalles, João Tovar·2022·Energy Economics

Abstract

Climate change is already a systemic risk to the global economy. While there is a large body of literature documenting potential economic consequences, there is scarce research on the link between climate change and sovereign risk. This paper therefore investigates the impact of climate change vulnerability and resilience on sovereign bond yields and spreads in 98 advanced and developing countries over the period 1995-2017. We find that the vulnerability and resilience to climate change have a significant impact on the cost government borrowing, after controlling for conventional determinants of sovereign risk. That is, countries that are more resilient to climate change have lower bond yields and spreads relative to countries with greater vulnerability to risks associated with climate change. Furthermore, partitioning the sample into country groups reveals that the magnitude and statistical significance of these effects are much greater in developing countries with weaker capacity to adapt to and mitigate the consequences of climate change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105856

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Redundancy becomes valuable during crisis because backup systems reduce the risk of complete failure when one component collapses.

    “Redundancy, often viewed as inefficient in stable times, becomes valuable during crisis because backup systems reduce the risk of complete failure when one component collapses (Cevik & Jalles, 2022).”

    From Climate Security, Water Governance, and Resilience How Climate-Induced Water Stress and Migration Challenge State Capacity (2026) · cites this paper as Cevik & Jalles, 2022

    The Conclusion (p. 12) says fiscal buffers and insurance schemes can help countries cope with climate change, but it does not discuss redundancy, backup components, or preventing complete system failure. Searches for those concepts found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cevik, S., & Jalles, J. T.
Affiliations
  • International Monetary Fund (US)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Jalles, João Tovar
Venue
Energy Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
107
Issue
079
Pages
105856
ISSN
0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3028917564
Cited by
206
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
17.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IMF Working Paper (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • International Myeloma Foundation
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/SOC/04521/2020, UIDB/05069/2020)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
climate change, sovereign risk, government bonds, bond yields, credit spreads, climate change vulnerability, climate resilience, government borrowing costs, developing countries, climate change adaptation, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review