Cited by 140Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCatalysts for Methane ReformingMining and Gasification Technologies

Technoeconomic analysis of a low CO2 emission dimethyl ether (DME) plant based on gasification of torrefied biomass

Open access
Clausen, Lasse R., Elmegaard, Brian, Houbak, Niels·2010·Energy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Torrefaction is a partial pyrolysis of biomass carried out under atmospheric pressure in a narrow temperature range of 200-300 °C, and under an inert environment.

    “Torrefaction is a partial pyrolysis of biomass which is carried out under atmospheric pressure in a narrow temperature range of 200-300 °C, and under an inert environment (Bergman et al., 2005;Clausen et al., 2010;Medic et al., 2011;Prins et al., 2006).”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction (2014) · cites this paper as Clausen et al., 2010

    The available indexed passages are bibliographic records (labelled Abstract, no page) that identify a study using torrefied biomass but do not describe torrefaction conditions. Searches for partial pyrolysis, 200–300 °C, atmospheric pressure, and an inert environment returned no substantive passage from the paper. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many of these improvements make torrefied biomass more suitable than raw biomass for co-firing in conventional coal power plants, with minor modifications.

    “Many of these improvements make the torrefied biomass more suitable than the raw biomass for co-firing in the conventional coal power plants, with minor modifications (Clausen et al., 2010).”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction (2014) · cites this paper as Clausen et al., 2010

    The available passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic information and keywords, not findings about co-firing. Searches for coal-plant co-firing and required modifications found no passage addressing whether torrefied biomass is more suitable than raw biomass. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clausen, L. R., Elmegaard, B., & Houbak, N.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Ørsted (Denmark) (DK)
Corresponding author
Clausen, Lasse R.
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
35
Issue
12
Pages
4831-4842
ISSN
0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086034678
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mining and Gasification Technologies
Keywords
dimethyl ether, torrefaction, torrefied biomass, biomass gasification, syngas, catalytic conversion, CO2 capture, CO2 emission reduction, energy efficiency, production costs, woody biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review