A non-equilibrium approach to modelling the weathering of stored Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The model has also been compared against the self-pressurization calculations reported by Wang et al. for a horizontal storage tank, and the BOG calculations of Migliore et al. for a standard LNG storage vertical tank with a 165,000 m3 capacity.
“The model has also been compared against the self-pressurization calculations reported by Wang et al. [46] for a horizontal storage tank, and the BOG calculations of Migliore et al. [44] for a standard LNG storage vertical tank with a 165,000 m 3 capacity.”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
Migliore et al. developed a non-equilibrium numerical model that allows for the vapor phase to be at a higher temperature than the liquid phase.
“Migliore et al. [44] developed a non-equilibrium numerical model that allows for the vapor phase to be at a higher temperature than the liquid phase.”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
Both models consider heat ingress in the vapor and liquid phases separately and enable heat transfer between the two phases across the interfacial surface area.
“Both models consider heat ingress in the vapor and liquid phases separately and enable heat transfer between the two phases across the interfacial surface area.”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off
Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Swanger, A., Jusko, V., Siahvashi, A., Perez, F., Johns, M. L., & May, E. F. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15031149 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“[44] for a standard LNG storage vertical tank with a 165,000 m3 capacity.”
BackgroundPerez, F., Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Gallagher, L., Siahvashi, A., Ryu, Y., Kim, S., Kim, S. G., Johns, M. L., & May, E. F. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.119853 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Advanced Boil-Off Gas Studies for Liquefied Natural Gas
Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Perez, F., Heum Park, K., Gallagher, L., Warr, L., Stroda, A., Siahvashi, A., Ryu, Y., Kim, S., Kim, S. G., et al. (2021) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116735 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Migliore, C., Salehi, A., & Vesovic, V.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Vesovic, Velisa
- ORCID
- Vesovic, Velisa
- Venue
- Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 124
- Pages
- 684-692
- ISSN
- 0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2590496114
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Energy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Offshore Engineering and Technologies
- Keywords
- liquefied natural gas, boil-off gas, nitrogen content, compositional change, isothermal assumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
