Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off
Open accessAbstract
A model has been developed and implemented in the software package BoilFAST that allows for reliable calculations of the self-pressurization and boil-off losses for liquid hydrogen in different tank geometries and thermal insulation systems. The model accounts for the heat transfer from the vapor to the liquid phase, incorporates realistic heat transfer mechanisms, and uses reference equations of state to calculate thermodynamic properties. The model is validated by testing against a variety of scenarios using multiple sets of industrially relevant data for liquid hydrogen (LH2), including self-pressurization and densification data obtained from an LH2 storage tank at NASA’s Kennedy Space Centre. The model exhibits excellent agreement with experimental and industrial data across a range of simulated conditions, including zero boil-off in microgravity environments, self-pressurization of a stored mass of LH2, and boil-off from a previously pressurized tank as it is being relieved of vapor.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper presents BoilFAST, an extended superheated-vapor (SHV) non-equilibrium model for liquid hydrogen boil-off and self-pressurization, validated against large-scale LH2 storage data. It shows good agreement with NASA Kennedy, NASA Glenn, and LLNL experiments across different tank geometries, fill levels, and heat fluxes.
Key findings
- For NASA Kennedy’s 125 m³ horizontal IRAS tank, BoilFAST reproduced 33% and 67% fill duty-cycle pressurization/depressurization and a 46% fill densification to hydrogen’s triple point; average \(U_L\) and \(U_V\) were 0.0066 W·m⁻²·K⁻¹ and \(U_{VL}\) was 0.6 W·m⁻²·K⁻¹.
- For NASA Glenn’s 4.89 m³ ellipsoidal tank at 83–84% fill, self-pressurization under heat fluxes of 0.35, 2, and 3.5 W/m² was in excellent agreement; \(U_{VL}\) = 1.04 W/m²/K, with stratification observed especially at 3.5 W/m².
- For the LLNL 12.5 m³ Dewar with relief pressure 310 kPa and initial 10.2 m³ LH2, BoilFAST matched summer/winter liquid-volume changes and variable heat ingress; \(U_V\) and \(U_L\) = 0.0045 W·m⁻²·K⁻¹ and \(U_{VL}\) = 0.15 W/m²/K.
- The model accounts for ortho–para hydrogen spin isomer composition; at 20.3 K the equilibrium para-hydrogen content is 99.8%, and a warmer vapor can drive endothermic para-to-ortho conversion.
Methods
- Extended SHV non-equilibrium model implemented in BoilFAST: solves phase energy balances with heat ingress to liquid and vapor, vapor–liquid heat transfer, and boil-off/relief mass transfer; uses Leachman reference Helmholtz equations of state for parahydrogen, orthohydrogen, and normal hydrogen, plus equilibrium ortho–para ratio equations.
- Validated against multiple LH2 datasets: NASA Kennedy 125 m³ IRAS tank (33%, 67% duty-cycle; 46% densification), NASA Glenn 4.89 m³ tank (83–84% full; heat fluxes 0.35–3.5 W/m²), and LLNL 12.5 m³ Dewar (relief 310 kPa; initial 10.2 m³).
- Heat transfer coefficients \(U_L\) and \(U_V\) were estimated from correlations or adjusted to match data; \(U_{VL}\) was fitted to experimental vapor temperature data.
Limitations
- Stated: \(U_{VL}\) was determined empirically from a fit to experimental vapor temperature data and “will be resolved in future work”; the model assumes the liquid phase is saturated and thermally homogeneous, so it cannot represent liquid thermal stratification.
- Stated future improvements: calculate vapor–liquid heat transfer coefficients for different tank geometries and insulation systems, describe liquid thermal stratification, and simulate filling/draining operations.
- Evident from the text: in some cases insufficient tank construction details required adjusting \(U_L\) and/or \(U_V\) to match BOG data; for NASA Glenn, insulation thickness was not stated and existing correlations could not be used, so coefficients were estimated from measured heat fluxes and ambient temperatures. Validation is limited to the specific tanks and conditions tested.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
10 of 81 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
This tank incorporates an Integrated Refrigeration and Storage (IRAS) system, which maintains the liquid in a zero boil-off state through the use of an internal cryogenic heat exchanger connected to an external Brayton cycle refrigerator.
“This tank incorporates an Integrated Refrigeration and Storage (IRAS) system [75], which maintains the liquid in a zero boil-off state through the use of an internal cryogenic heat exchanger connected to an external Brayton cycle refrigerator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] Notardonato, 2017, Zero boil-off methods for large-scale liquid hydrogen tanks using integrated refrigeration and storage, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. source
- Premisecitation
Liquefaction processes use heterogeneous catalysts to ensure this equilibrium ratio is attained to prevent the exothermic ortho-to para-hydrogen conversion from occurring during storage.
“Liquefaction processes use heterogeneous catalysts to ensure this equilibrium ratio is attained to prevent the exothermic ortho-to para-hydrogen conversion from occurring during storage [66].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] Skaugen, 2020, Comparing exergy losses and evaluating the potential of catalyst-filled plate-fin and spiral-wound heat exchangers in a large-scale Claude hydrogen liquefaction process, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- Findingown data
A model has been developed and implemented in BoilFAST that allows reliable calculations of self-pressurization and boil-off losses for liquid hydrogen in different tank geometries and thermal insulation systems.
“A model has been developed and implemented in the software package BoilFAST that allows for reliable calculations of the self-pressurization and boil-off losses for liquid hydrogen in different tank geometries and thermal insulation systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The model accounts for heat transfer from the vapor to the liquid phase.
“The model accounts for the heat transfer from the vapor to the liquid phase, incorporates realistic heat transfer mechanisms, and uses reference equations of state to calculate thermodynamic properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The sensor located at a height of 162 cm is located approximately in the centre of the vapor space.
“The tank has an internal height of 183 cm, thus the sensor located at a height of 162 cm is located approximately in the centre of the vapor space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingreasoning
Some deviation exists between the model and the data's curvature in Test 2 (2 W/m2).
“Some deviation exists with the data's curvature in Test 2 (2 W/m 2 ); however, this potentially reflects that the heat flux at the beginning of the experiment was initially slightly larger than the average value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
BoilFAST has been developed to estimate the boil-off from liquid hydrogen storage using a non-equilibrium approach.
“A robust, efficient, and flexible simulation tool, BoilFAST, has been developed to estimate the boil-off from liquid hydrogen storage using a non-equilibrium approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The temperatures recorded by the sensor at 162 cm are in excellent agreement with the vapor temperature calculated by BoilFAST.
“The temperatures recorded by this sensor are in excellent agreement with the vapor temperature calculated by BoilFAST.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Using Equation (14), the average values of UL and UV during the simulation were found to be 0.0066 W·m−2·K−1.
“Using Equation ( 14), the average values of U L and U V during the simulation were found to be 0.0066 W•m -2 •K -1 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Here, we present an improved version of the superheated vapor (SHV) model developed previously that is capable of simulating liquid hydrogen storage.
“Here, we present an improved version of the superheated vapor (SHV) model developed previously [58,59] that is capable of simulating liquid hydrogen storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
Stratification in both the liquid and vapor phases is observed for all tests, particularly for the highest heat flux of 3.5 W/m2.
“Stratification in both the liquid and vapor phases is observed for all tests, particularly for the highest heat flux of 3.5 W/m 2 , as shown in Figure 5b.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The results from the BoilFAST simulations are in good agreement with the experimental data from multiple large-scale liquid hydrogen storage tests measured across a range of conditions.
“The results presented in this work show that the results from the BoilFAST simulations are in good agreement with the experimental data from multiple large-scale liquid hydrogen storage tests measured across a range of conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
BoilFAST self-pressurization estimates are in excellent agreement with experimental results for Tests 1 to 3 for heat fluxes from 0.35 to 3.5 W/m2.
“The self-pressurization results for Tests 1 to 3 for 0.35 to 3.5 W/m 2 are shown in Figure 5a and are in excellent agreement with the BoilFAST estimates denoted by the solid curves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this work, the heat transfer coefficient across the vapor-liquid interface UVL (0.6 W·m−2·K−1) was determined empirically from a fit to the experimental vapor temperature data.
“In this work, the heat transfer coefficient across the vapor-liquid interface U VL (0.6 W•m -2 •K -1 ) was determined empirically from a fit to the experimental vapor temperature data; this will be resolved in future work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
No quantitative comparisons have yet been made for liquid hydrogen applications.
“However, no quantitative comparisons have yet been made for liquid hydrogen applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Hydrogen can be liquefied by cooling to approximately 20 K at atmospheric pressure.
“To overcome this, hydrogen can be liquefied by cooling to approximately 20 K (-253 • C) at atmospheric pressure [5][6][7].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [5] Abe, 1998, Studies of the large-scale sea transportation of liquid hydrogen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- cites [6] Gursu, 1992, An optimization study of liquid hydrogen boil-off losses, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- cites [7] Petitpas, G. (2018). Boil-Off Losses along the LH2 Pathway, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. source
- Study design and conductown data
The model is validated by testing against a variety of scenarios using multiple sets of industrially relevant data for liquid hydrogen, including self-pressurization and densification data from NASA's Kennedy Space Centre.
“The model is validated by testing against a variety of scenarios using multiple sets of industrially relevant data for liquid hydrogen (LH2), including self-pressurization and densification data obtained from an LH 2 storage tank at NASA's Kennedy Space Centre.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In the work of Petitpas, a 12.5 m3 LH2 Dewar tank with a 2 m internal diameter at the Lawrence Livermore Cryogenic Hydrogen Test Facility was subjected to ambient heat ingress to measure the change in liquid volume over summer versus winter.
“In the work of Petitpas [27], a 12.5 m 3 LH 2 Dewar tank with a 2 m internal diameter at the Lawrence Livermore Cryogenic Hydrogen Test Facility was subjected to ambient heat ingress to measure the change in liquid volume over summer versus winter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Petitpas, 2018, Simulation of boil-off losses during transfer at a LH2 based hydrogen refueling station, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- Premisecitation
Because of its larger thermal diffusivity, the gas phase above the stored liquid hydrogen will generally be warmer than the liquid leading to the reverse, endothermic conversion of para-to ortho-hydrogen.
“However, because of its larger thermal diffusivity, the gas phase above the stored liquid hydrogen will generally be warmer than the liquid leading to the reverse, endothermic conversion of para-to ortho-hydrogen [67].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] Petitpas, 2014, Para-H2 to ortho-H2 conversion in a full-scale automotive cryogenic pressurized hydrogen storage up to 345 bar, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- Interpretationown data
The existing engineering correlations for manually estimating wall-fluid heat transfer coefficients (U_L and U_V) are sufficiently accurate to allow a robust representation of BOG phenomena across a range of tank sizes, geometries, and fluids, including liquid hydrogen.
“This work also demonstrates that the existing engineering correlations for manually estimating wall-fluid heat transfer coefficients (U L and U V ) are sufficiently accurate to allow a robust representation of BOG phenomena across a range of tank sizes, geometries, and fluids-including liquid hydrogen, which provided adequate detail regarding the insulation used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Most implementations of the reference Helmholtz equations of state for parahydrogen and orthohydrogen developed by Leachman et al. require the user to independently evaluate Equations (1) and (2) to determine the ortho-para ratio at each temperature.
“Unfortunately, most implementations of the reference Helmholtz equations of state for parahydrogen and orthohydrogen developed by Leachman et al. [64] require the user to independently evaluate Equations ( 1) and (2) to determine the ortho-para ratio at each temperature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Leachman, 2009, Fundamental Equations of State for Parahydrogen, Normal Hydrogen, and Orthohydrogen, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data source
- Premisecitation
In Petitpas's model, 50 W was found to yield the closest estimate to the experimental data.
“This model ignores the insulation in the energy balance, instead assuming a constant rate of heat ingress into the tank; 50 W was found to yield the closest estimate to the experimental data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Petitpas, 2018, Simulation of boil-off losses during transfer at a LH2 based hydrogen refueling station, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- Interpretationreasoning
Non-equilibrium models need to also describe a vapor phase at a higher temperature, for which the concentration of orthohydrogen may be non-negligible.
“However, non-equilibrium models need to also describe a vapor phase at a higher temperature, for which the concentration of orthohydrogen may be non-negligible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: At liquid hydrogen storage conditions, the equilibrium fraction of parahydrogen is around 99.8% (at the normal boiling point of 20.3 K).
- Premisecitation
Boil-off from the storage tank during the transfer of LH2 from a supply trailer to the storage tank was found to be one of the most important sources of hydrogen loss.
“Boil-off from the storage tank during the transfer of LH 2 from a supply trailer to the storage tank was found to be one of the most important sources of hydrogen loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Petitpas, G. (2018). Boil-Off Losses along the LH2 Pathway, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. source
- Premisecitation
To our knowledge, the only model developed for BOG studies of LH2 is that reported by Petitpas, who modified a MATLAB code previously developed by NASA to estimate boiloff losses along the entire LH2 pathway, from liquefaction to dispensing.
“To our knowledge, the only model developed for BOG studies of LH 2 is that reported by Petitpas [7], who modified a MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) code previously developed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to estimate boiloff losses along the entire LH 2 pathway, from liquefaction to dispensing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Petitpas, G. (2018). Boil-Off Losses along the LH2 Pathway, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. source
- Premisenone given
The model's performance for LNG was validated against data measured for binary and multi-component mixtures of light hydrocarbons and N2.
“The model's performance for LNG was then validated against data measured for binary and multi-component mixtures of light hydrocarbons and N 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
At room temperature at equilibrium, normal hydrogen comprises 75% ortho- and 25% para-hydrogen molecules.
“At room temperature at equilibrium, so-called normal hydrogen comprises 75% orthoand 25% para-hydrogen molecules (See Equations (1) and ( 2)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Any dynamic model that assumes the hydrogen vapor is at the equilibrium ortho-para ratio corresponding to its temperature might incorrectly represent the system's dynamic energy balance and, consequently, the boil-off rate.
“Hence, any dynamic model that assumes the hydrogen vapor is at the equilibrium ortho-para ratio corresponding to its temperature might incorrectly represent the system's dynamic energy balance and, consequently, the boil-off rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
U_VL = 0.15 W/m2/K was chosen for the model because it best matched the vapor temperature data reported by Petitpas.
“A vapor-liquid heat transfer coefficient, U VL = 0.15 W/m 2 /K was chosen as this best matched the vapor temperature data reported by Petitpas [27].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Petitpas, 2018, Simulation of boil-off losses during transfer at a LH2 based hydrogen refueling station, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- Premisereasoning
In the absence of suitable heterogeneous catalysts, the conversion is very slow and occurs over the order of a few days.
“In the absence of suitable heterogeneous catalysts, the conversion is very slow and occurs over the order of a few days.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Petitpas used his model to empirically determine the dependence of heat transfer into the storage tank on the level of LH2 fill, with heat fluxes varying from approximately 2.2 W/m2 when nearly full, to 1.0 W/m2 when empty for a 12.5 m3 vertical storage tank.
“Petitpas used his model to empirically determine the dependence of heat transfer into the storage tank on the level of LH 2 fill, with heat fluxes varying from approximately 2.2 W/m 2 when nearly full, to 1.0 W/m 2 when empty for a 12.5 m 3 vertical storage tank.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Petitpas, G. (2018). Boil-Off Losses along the LH2 Pathway, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. source
- Study design and conductcitation
U_VL = 1.04 W/m2/K was chosen for the model because it best matched the average vapor temperature behavior reported by Hasan et al. for the 3.5 W/m2 case.
“A vaporliquid heat transfer coefficient, U VL = 1.04 W/m 2 /K, was chosen as this best matched the average vapor temperature behaviour presented by Hasan et al. [53] for the 3.5 W/m 2 case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hasan et al. [53] Hasan, M.M., Lin, C.S., van Dresar, N.T., and Park, F. (1991, January 1). Self-pressurization of a flightweight liquid hydrogen storage tank subjected to low heat flux. Proceedings of the ASME/AIChE National Heat Transfer Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Interpretationown data
The value of U_VL depends in part on the tank, fluid, and vapor-liquid interface geometry.
“However, this value depends in part on the tank, fluid, and vapor-liquid interface geometry-the LNG experiments were conducted in a 0.0067 m 3 vertical cylinder, while the cases modelled here were conducted in a 4.89 m 3 ellipsoidal tank.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Enabling BOG management on large scales represents a significant technical challenge that is yet to be resolved.
“However, enabling BOG management on such scales represents a significant technical challenge that is yet to be resolved [24][25][26].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [24] Kalanidhi, 1988, Boil-off in long-term stored liquid hydrogen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- cites [25] Sakamoto, 2021, Investigation of boiling hydrogen flow characteristics under low-pressure conditions—Flow regime transition characteristics, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- cites [26] Sherif, 1997, Liquid hydrogen: Potential, problems, and a proposed research program, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- Premisecitation
An experiment conducted at NASA's Glenn Research Centre by Hasan et al. investigated the self-pressurization and thermal stratification of a LH2 storage tank subject to three heat fluxes between 0.35 and 3.5 W/m2, hereafter referred to as Tests 1-3.
“An experiment conducted at NASA's Glenn Research Centre (formerly Lewis Research Centre) by Hasan et al. [53] investigated the self-pressurization and thermal stratification of a LH 2 storage tank subject to three heat fluxes between 0.35 and 3.5 W/m 2 -, hereafter referred to as Tests 1-3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Hasan, M.M., Lin, C.S., van Dresar, N.T., and Park, F. (1991, January 1). Self-pressurization of a flightweight liquid hydrogen storage tank subjected to low heat flux. Proceedings of the ASME/AIChE National Heat Transfer Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Premisecitation
The temperature dependent equilibrium orthohydrogen-parahydrogen ratio can be calculated using Equations (1) and (2).
“The temperature dependent equilibrium orthohydrogen-parahydrogen ratio can be calculated using Equations ( 1) and (2) [62].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Alarcon, 2011, Determination of the parahydrogen fraction in a liquid hydrogen target using energy-dependent slow neutron transmission, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. source
- Premisecitation
Boil-off is particularly important during atmospheric departure, where frictional drag forces result in substantial heat ingress into the containment vessel, thereby increasing vapor temperature and pressure.
“Boil-off is particularly important during atmospheric departure, where frictional drag forces result in substantial heat ingress into the containment vessel, thereby increasing vapor temperature and pressure [31].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Bailey, T.E., and Fearn, R.F. (1964). Analytical and Experimental Determination of Liquid-Hydrogen Temperature Stratification, Springer. source
- May combine two claims. 30
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 35
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany studies have investigated how to minimize boil-off losses and empirically determined that top fill (spray) is the most effective way to reduce transfer losses during loading, but the underlying physics remains poorly understood.
“While many studies [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84] have investigated how to minimize boil-off losses and empirically determined that top fill (spray) is the most effective way to reduce transfer losses during loading, the underlying physics remains poorly understood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [71] Moran, M., and Nyland, T.E.D. (1992, January 6–8). Hydrogen no-vent testing in a 5 cubic foot (142 L) tank using spray nozzle and spray bar liquid injection. Proceedings of the 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nashville, TN, USA. source
- cites [72] Moran, M.E., Nyland, T.W., and Driscoll, S.L. (1992). Hydrogen No-Vent Fill Testing in a 34 Liter (1.2 Cubic Foot) Tank. source
- cites [73] Chato, D. (1993, January 1). Ground testing for the no-vent fill of cryogenic tanks—Results of tests for a 71 cubic foot tank. Proceedings of the 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Monterey, CA, USA. source
The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that both the spray bar and bottom-orifice configurations maintained reasonable tank pressures and that there were few differences between their fills. Rather than finding spray fill most effective, the paper reports successful no-vent fills with both configurations; it also says its equilibrium model predicted both with good accuracy, while noting that low-gravity performance remained unproven. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenFor Figure 4b, the measured temperature from sensor TT10 was lower than that estimated because the liquid also thermally stratified.
“For Figure 4b, sensor TT10, located at the 61% fill level [78], was closest to the vapor liquid interface (approximately 13 cm below); the measured temperature was lower tha”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [78] Swanger, 2017, Large scale production of densified hydrogen to the triple point and below, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. source
- cites [75] Notardonato, 2017, Zero boil-off methods for large-scale liquid hydrogen tanks using integrated refrigeration and storage, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. source
Section 5 (page unavailable) reports liquid-temperature stratification and mentions TT10 in a 67% fill-level test. It does not identify TT10 as being at the 61% fill level or 13 cm below the interface, nor does it compare TT10’s measured temperature with an estimate or attribute such a difference to stratification. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe mean effective thermal conductivity of this IRAS MLI system was 0.14 mW·m−1·K−1; this value was used in Equation (14).
“The mean effective thermal conductivity of this IRAS MLI system was 0.14 mW•m -1 •K -1 ; this value was used in Equation ( 14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] Fesmire, 2018, Cylindrical cryogenic calorimeter testing of six types of multilayer insulation systems, Cryogenics source
The Conclusion (p. 18) reports effective thermal conductivities for MLI systems, but does not identify an IRAS MLI system or give its mean conductivity as 0.14 mW·m−1·K−1. Searches for “IRAS” and “0.14 mW/mK” found no passage establishing that value; the paper’s use of 0.00014 is in different units. Whether the citing authors used a value in their Equation (14) is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationRecently, the model's performance was compared against BOG data obtained for ternary mixtures of methane, ethane, and nitrogen using our apparatus and an LNG mixture used as rocket fuel conducted at Kennedy Space Centre (NASA).
“Recently [86], the model's performance was compared against BOG data obtained for ternary mixtures of methane, ethane, and nitrogen using our apparatus [58] and an LNG mixture used as rocket fuel conducted at Kennedy Space Centre (NASA) [87].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [86] Ghafri, 2021, Advanced Boil-Off Gas Studies of Liquefied Natural Gas used for the Space and Energy Industries, Acta Astronaut source
- cites [58] Perez, 2021, Measurements of boil-off gas and stratification in cryogenic liquid nitrogen with implications for the storage and transport of liquefied natural gas, Energy source
- cites [87] Rose, L., Swanger, A.M., Notardonato, W.U., Fesmire, J.E., Gleeson, J., and Carro, R. (2019, January 21–25). Integrated Refrigeration and Storage of LNG for Compositional Stability. Proceedings of the Cryogenic Engineering Conference and International Cryogenic Materials Conference, Hartford, CT, USA. source
The Introduction identifies a NASA Kennedy Space Center research program studying LNG as a potential rocket fuel. But the Discussion and future experimental investigations section says LNG had not yet been delivered and the first LNG boiloff test had not begun. This paper therefore does not provide the LNG boiloff data implied by the citation. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis model is flexible with regards to the fluid type, utilises reference Helmholtz equations of state for the thermodynamic property calculations and has physically-based parameters that are anchored by high-quality experimental data for pure fluids measured using a custom BOG apparatus.
“This model is flexible with regards to the fluid type, utilises reference Helmholtz equations of state [60,61] for the thermodynamic property calculations and, most importantly, has physically-based parameters that are anchored by high-quality experimental data for pure fluids measured using a custom BOG apparatus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [60] Kunz, 2012, The GERG-2008 Wide-Range Equation of State for Natural Gases and Other Mixtures: An Expansion of GERG-2004, J. Chem. Eng. Data source
- cites [61] Monika, 2019, EOS-LNG: A Fundamental Equation of State for the Calculation of Thermodynamic Properties of Liquefied Natural Gases, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data source
Split into 3 atoms — 2 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThis capability of the model to simulate storage at sub-atmospheric pressures is highly relevant to LH2 applications in microgravity environments, including the cryogenic storage systems needed for future long-term space missions.
“This capability of the model to simulate storage at sub-atmospheric pressures is highly relevant to LH 2 applications in microgravity environments, including the cryogenic storage systems needed for future long-term space missions [90].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Tesny, E.M., and Hauser, D.M. (2019). Thermal Modeling of Zero Boil Off Tank Experiment. AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2019 Forum, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. source
The Background (page unavailable) says cryogenic-fluid storage in microgravity is crucial for future long-term space missions, and Future Work proposes comparing the model’s results with a cryogen in microgravity. Our copy does not establish that the model can simulate storage at sub-atmospheric pressures or specifically address LH2; the experiment used perfluoro-normal-pentane. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe model exhibits excellent agreement with experimental and industrial data across a range of simulated conditions, including zero boil-off in microgravity environments, self-pressurization of a stored mass of LH2, and boil-off from a previously pressurized tank as it is being relieved of vapor.
“The model exhibits excellent agreement with experimental and industrial data across a range of simulated conditions, including zero boil-off in microgravity environments, self-pressurization of a stored mass of LH 2 , and boil-off from a previously pressurized tank as it is being relieved of vapor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe model uses reference equations of state to calculate thermodynamic properties.
“The model accounts for the heat transfer from the vapor to the liquid phase, incorporates realistic heat transfer mechanisms, and uses reference equations of state to calculate thermodynamic properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe liquid temperature estimation closely aligns with the experimental results for the densification experiment, except for an irregularity in the data occurring in the range of 125 to 250 h, which was caused by temporary issues with the refrigeration system.
“The liquid temperature estimation closely aligns with the experimental results, except for an irregularity in the data occurring in the range of 125 to 250 h, which was caused by temporary issues with the refrigeration system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverall, the BoilFAST calculations are in good agreement with the experimental data for both the 33% and 67% fill experiments.
“Overall, the BoilFAST calculations are in good agreement with the experimental dat for both the 33% (Figure 4a) and 67% (Figure 4b) fill experiments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe model is flexible with regards to the spin isomer composition of the hydrogen in each phase, tank geometry, and associated heat transfer, allowing the simulation of a wide range of scenarios.
“The model is flexible with regards to the spin isomer composition of the hydrogen in each phase, tank geometry, and associated heat transfer, allowing the simulation of a wide range of scenarios.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe sensor at a height of 139 cm is close to the liquid-vapor interface and is well represented by the model's liquid temperature estimation.
“As a result, the sensor at a height of 139 cm is close to the liquid-vapor interface and is well represented by the model's liquid temperature estimation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenA vapor-liquid heat transfer coefficient, UVL = 1.04 W/m2/K, was chosen as this best.
“A vaporliquid heat transfer coefficient, U VL = 1.04 W/m 2 /K, was chosen as this best”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningGood agreement exists between the SHV model and each of the sources from all of the comparisons listed above.
“Good agreement exists between the SHV model and each of the sources from all of the comparisons listed above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe model represents the pressurization and subsequent depressurization for both experiments, well only slightly deviating in the pressurization rate during the initial heat leak and at the activation of the IRAS.
“The model represent the pressurization and subsequent depressurization for both experiments, well onl slightly deviating in the pressurization rate during the initial heat leak and at the activa tion of the IRAS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe resulting BoilFAST simulation matched the experimental data well, capturing the variable heat ingress rate evident in the slightly non-linear experimental data.
“The resulting simulation matched the experimental data well, capturing the variable heat ingress rate evident in the slightly non-linear experimental data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe resultant pressure decline in the tank is also well represented, with the same deviation observed in the middle of the experiment.
“The resultant pressure decline in the tank is also well represented, with the same deviation observed in the middle of the experiment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAt the initial tank pressure of 111 kPa, hydrogen has a saturation temperature of 20.6 K and para-hydrogen content of 99.8%.
“At the initial tank pressure of 111 kPa, hydrogen has a saturation temperature of 20.6 K and para-hydrogen content of 99.8%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLiquid hydrogen will play a key role in the transition away from fossil fuels.
“Liquid hydrogen (LH 2 ) [1][2][3] will play a key role in this transition [4] as it is clean-burning and can function as a store of energy generated from zero-or low-carbon sources, such as renewables or natural gas combined with carbon capture and storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Dong, 2018, CO2 emissions, economic and population growth, and renewable energy: Empirical evidence across regions, Energy Econ. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe temperature difference between the volume of stored liquid and the ambient environment ensures that heat ingress into the LH2 is inevitable, which can cause it to evaporate.
“The resulting temperature difference between the volume of stored liquid and the ambient environment ensures that heat ingress into the LH 2 is inevitable, which can cause it to evaporate [8].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Wang, 2021, Numerical investigation on subcooled pool film boiling of liquid hydrogen in different gravities, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe evaporated vapor is termed boil-off gas (BOG) and its generation leads to a pressure increase in the relevant storage tank in a process known as self-pressurization, necessitating venting of the tank into the atmosphere and loss of valuable hydrogen.
“The evaporated vapor is termed boil-off gas (BOG) [9][10][11][12][13] and its generation leads to a pressure increase in the relevant storage tank in a process known as self-pressurization, necessitating venting of the tank into the atmosphere and loss of valuable hydrogen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] Tan, 2016, Enhancement of energy performance in a boil-off gas re-liquefaction system of LNG carriers using ejectors, Energy Convers. Manag. source
- cites [10] Lin, 2018, An approach to estimating the boil-off rate of LNG in type C independent tank for floating storage and regasification unit under different filling ratio, Appl. Therm. Eng. source
- cites [11] Querol, 2010, Boil off gas (BOG) management in Spanish liquid natural gas (LNG) terminals, Appl. Energy source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHeat ingress causes the vapor temperature to increase faster than that of the liquid due to the vapor's higher thermal diffusivity, resulting in heat conduction across the vapor-liquid interface and a temperature gradient in the top layer of the liquid phase with the interface at a higher temperature than the bulk liquid (thermal stratification).
“Additionally, heat ingress causes the vapor temperature to increase faster than that of the liquid due to the vapor's higher thermal diffusivity (α = κ/ρ•c p ), resulting in heat conduction across the vapor-liquid interface, and thus a temperature gradient in the top layer of the liquid phase with the interface at a higher temperature than the bulk liquid: this is known as thermal stratification [”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] Kang, 2018, Experimental investigation of thermal stratification in cryogenic tanks, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. source
- cites [16] Gursu, 1993, Analysis and Optimization of Thermal Stratification and Self-Pressurization Effects in Liquid Hydrogen Storage Systems—Part 1: Model Development, J. Energy Resour. Technol. source
- cites [17] Choi, 2017, Numerical analysis of convective flow and thermal stratification in a cryogenic storage tank, Numer. Heat Transf. Part A Appl. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDepending on the insulation quality and the tank's surface-to-volume ratio, BOG generation can be on the order of 0.4% per day for a 50 m3 cryogenic tank and 0.06% per day for a 20,000 m3 LH2 tank.
“Depending on the insulation quality and the tank's surface-to-volume ratio, BOG generation can be on the order of 0.4% per day for a 50 m 3 cryogenic tank and 0.06% per day for a 20,000 m 3 LH 2 tank [14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Verfondern, K. (2007). Safety Considerations on Liquid Hydrogen, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIf the warmer stratified layers enter the rocket propellant feed system, pump cavitation can occur, which could potentially destroy the rocket.
“If the warmer stratified layers enter the rocket propellant feed system, pump cavitation can occur, which could potentially destroy the rocket [35].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Tatom, J.W., Brown, W.H., Knight, L.H., and Coxe, E.F. (1964). Analysis of Thermal Stratification of Liquid Hydrogen in Rocket Propellant Tanks, Springer. source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIt was not possible to use existing correlations to estimate the ambient-vapor and ambient-liquid heat transfer coefficients in this case as there are insufficient details concerning the insulation system used and uncertainty as to how the use of the electrical resistance heaters can be incorporated into such calculations.
“It was not possible to use existing correlations to estimate these values in this case as there are insufficient details concerning the insulation system used and uncertainly as to how the use of the electrical resistance heaters can be incorporated into such calculations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe liquid temperature estimated by the model is the saturation value corresponding to the tank pressure, which will always be higher than temperatures measured by sensors immersed in the bulk liquid phase due to stratification.
“The liquid temperature estimated by the model is the saturation value corresponding to the tank pressure, which will always be higher than temperatures measured by sensors immersed in the bulk liquid phase (below the interface) due to stratification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The liquid phase is saturated and thermally homogenous.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAn accurate and robust BOG model is required to model the storage of LH2 in rockets and spacecraft, and thereby verify the performance of newly designed LH2 storage systems.
“An accurate and robust BOG model is thus required to model the storage of LH 2 in rockets and spacecraft, and thereby verify the performance of newly designed LH 2 storage systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHuerta and Vesovic expanded the non-equilibrium model to include more realistic heat transfer mechanisms in the vapor phase.
“This was then expanded by Huerta and Vesovic [39] to include more realistic heat transfer mechanisms in the vapor phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Huerta, 2019, A realistic vapour phase heat transfer model for the weathering of LNG stored in large tanks, Energy source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe model calculations were also compared against literature data reported by the Gas Research Institute for six different LNG weathering tests, and those reported by Harper and Powars for a self-pressurization test from 283 kPa to 1585 kPa in an advanced on-vehicle LNG fuel system.
“The model calculations were also compared against literature data reported by the Gas Research Institute [56] for six different LNG weathering tests, and those reported by Harper and Powars [57] for a self-pressurization test from 283 kPa to 1585 kPa in an advanced on-vehicle LNG fuel system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [56] Kountz, K.J. (1999). Weathering of On-Board Storage Tanks. Project Final Report, Institute of Gas Technology. IGT Project 32034-02.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [57] Harper, G., and Powars, C. (2021, December 16). Advanced Liquid Natural Gas Onboard Storage System, Available online: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/835120-advanced-liquid-natural-gas-onboard-storage-system.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the authors' previous work modelling LNG boil-off, a U_VL of 4.0 W/m2/K produced the best match for the experiment.
“In our previous work modelling LNG boil-off [59], we found that a U VL of 4.0 W/m 2 /K produced the best match for the experiment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Perez, 2021, Advanced Boil-Off Gas Studies for Liquefied Natural Gas, Appl. Therm. Eng. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth models consider heat ingress in the vapor and liquid phases separately and enable heat transfer between the two phases across the interfacial surface area.
“Both models consider heat ingress in the vapor and liquid phases separately and enable heat transfer between the two phases across the interfacial surface area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMigliore et al. developed a non-equilibrium numerical model that allows for the vapor phase to be at a higher temperature than the liquid phase.
“Migliore et al. [44] developed a non-equilibrium numerical model that allows for the vapor phase to be at a higher temperature than the liquid phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Migliore, 2017, A non-equilibrium approach to modelling the weathering of stored Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Energy source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAt absolute zero, all the hydrogen molecules must be in a rotational ground state and thus 100% para-hydrogen.
“At absolute zero, all the hydrogen molecules must be in a rotational ground state and thus 100% para-hydrogen [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Boeva, 2017, Low-temperature ortho–para hydrogen conversion catalyzed by gold nanoparticles: Particle size does not affect the rate, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe model has also been compared against the self-pressurization calculations reported by Wang et al. for a horizontal storage tank, and the BOG calculations of Migliore et al. for a standard LNG storage vertical tank with a 165,000 m3 capacity.
“The model has also been compared against the self-pressurization calculations reported by Wang et al. [46] for a horizontal storage tank, and the BOG calculations of Migliore et al. [44] for a standard LNG storage vertical tank with a 165,000 m 3 capacity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTools that can accurately estimate BOG production are particularly important in the context of industrial-scale LH2 storage, as the capital expense to design and implement such systems is large, and experimental testing at a relevant pilot-scale can be cost-prohibitive with the results obtained making it difficult to translate to full-scale if their description is entirely empirical.
“Tools that can accurately estimate BOG production are particularly important in the context of industrial-scale LH 2 storage, as the capital expense to design and implement such systems is large, and experimental testing at a relevant pilot-scale can be cost-prohibitive with the results obtained making it difficult to translate to full-scale if their description is entirely empirical [27,28].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Petitpas, 2018, Simulation of boil-off losses during transfer at a LH2 based hydrogen refueling station, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- cites [28] Zuo, 2019, Thermal stratification suppression in reduced or zero boil-off hydrogen tank by self-spinning spray bar, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAppreciable temperature gradients (thermal stratification) may exist within the fluid contained by the vessel.
“It was also shown that appreciable temperature gradients (thermal stratification) may exist within the fluid contained by the vessel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Petitpas, G. (2018). Boil-Off Losses along the LH2 Pathway, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe tank is insulated with two blankets of MLI, each having seventeen Mylar layers; however, the thickness of the insulation layer was not stated by Hasan et al.
“The tank is insulated with two blankets of MLI, each having seventeen Mylar layers; however, the thickness of the insulation layer was not stated by Hasan et al. [53].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Hasan, M.M., Lin, C.S., van Dresar, N.T., and Park, F. (1991, January 1). Self-pressurization of a flightweight liquid hydrogen storage tank subjected to low heat flux. Proceedings of the ASME/AIChE National Heat Transfer Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationA high-fidelity, physically-based BOG model would allow developers to iterate through full-scale vessel layouts completely within the design space, enabling cost and time savings by better informing decisions on the overall development path and strategy.
“A high-fidelity, physically-based BOG model would allow developers to iterate through full-scale vessel layouts completely within the design space, enabling cost and time savings by better informing decisions on the overall development path and strategy [7].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Petitpas, G. (2018). Boil-Off Losses along the LH2 Pathway, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSchaffer found that the payload weight of the cryogenic propulsion stages is considerably influenced by the boil-off rate.
“The impact of boil-off limitations on future long-term Mars missions is described in detail by Schaffer [37], who found that the payload weight of the cryogenic propulsion stages is considerably influenced by the boil-off rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Schaffer, M. (2012). A Study of Cryogenic Propulsive Stages for Human Exploration beyond Low Earth Orbit, International Astronautical Federation.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe deviation in Test 2 potentially reflects that the heat flux at the beginning of the experiment was initially slightly larger than the average value.
“Some deviation exists with the data's curvature in Test 2 (2 W/m 2 ); however, this potentially reflects that the heat flux at the beginning of the experiment was initially slightly larger than the average value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWang et al. proposed a non-equilibrium model to simulate LNG during storage and refuelling.
“More recently, a non-equilibrium model was proposed by Wang et al. [46] to simulate LNG during storage and refuelling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Wang, 2020, Non-equilibrium thermodynamic model for liquefied natural gas storage tanks, Energy source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPetitpas presented a model to estimate the boil-off losses based on their experimental data.
“Petitpas also presented a model to estimate the boil-off losses based on their experimental data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Petitpas, 2018, Simulation of boil-off losses during transfer at a LH2 based hydrogen refueling station, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese models were developed for LNG mixtures in specific scenarios and limited experimental or industrial data were available to verify simulations conducted using these models.
“However, these models were developed for LNG mixtures in specific scenarios and limited experimental or industrial data were available to verify simulations conducted using these models [56,57].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [56] Kountz, K.J. (1999). Weathering of On-Board Storage Tanks. Project Final Report, Institute of Gas Technology. IGT Project 32034-02.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [57] Harper, G., and Powars, C. (2021, December 16). Advanced Liquid Natural Gas Onboard Storage System, Available online: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/835120-advanced-liquid-natural-gas-onboard-storage-system.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningSeveral proposals based on exploiting the endothermic para-ortho conversion for cooling purposes and/or to reduce boil-off have been considered; these efforts would be facilitated by a BOG model able to account for a vapor that is not at compositional or thermal equilibrium with the liquid.
“Several proposals based on exploiting the endothermic para-ortho conversion for cooling purposes and/or to reduce boil-off [67][68][69][70] have been considered; these efforts would be facilitated by a BOG model able to account for a vapor that is not at compositional or thermal equilibrium with the liquid.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [67] Petitpas, 2014, Para-H2 to ortho-H2 conversion in a full-scale automotive cryogenic pressurized hydrogen storage up to 345 bar, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- cites [68] Ubaid, 2014, Effect of para–ortho conversion on hydrogen storage system performance, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
- cites [69] Peng, 2013, Enhanced dormancy due to para-to-ortho hydrogen conversion in insulated cryogenic pressure vessels for automotive applications, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPetitpas's model ignores the insulation in the energy balance and assumes a constant rate of heat ingress into the tank.
“This model ignores the insulation in the energy balance, instead assuming a constant rate of heat ingress into the tank; 50 W was found to yield the closest estimate to the experimental data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Petitpas, 2018, Simulation of boil-off losses during transfer at a LH2 based hydrogen refueling station, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenHere, the industrial and experimental data of LH2 boil-off and tank self-pressurization are compared with corresponding estimations made using BoilFAST to validate its use for liquid hydrogen storage applications.
“Here, the industrial and experimental data of LH 2 boil-off and tank self-pressurization are compared with corresponding estimations made using BoilFAST to validate its use for liquid hydrogen storage applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThroughout the Petitpas experiment, the system remained static, meaning no mass transfer across the system boundary occurred.
“Throughout the experiment, the system remained 'static', meaning no mass transfer across the system boundary (such as refuelling) occurred.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Petitpas, 2018, Simulation of boil-off losses during transfer at a LH2 based hydrogen refueling station, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe stratified mass is unusable as fuel and becomes a liability to the payload capacity of the rocket.
“Additionally, as this stratified mass is unusable as fuel, it becomes a liability to the payload capacity of the rocket [36].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Joseph, 2016, Effect of Insulation Thickness on Pressure Evolution and Thermal Stratification in a Cryogenic Tank, Appl. Therm. Eng. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDesigns incorporating multi-layer insulation, minimal tank thermal connection points, and deployable sun shields have been proposed to reduce the impact of boil-off.
“To reduce the impact of boil-off, designs incorporating multi-layer insulation, minimal tank thermal connection points, and deployable sun shields have been proposed [37].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Schaffer, M. (2012). A Study of Cryogenic Propulsive Stages for Human Exploration beyond Low Earth Orbit, International Astronautical Federation.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMany computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and thermodynamic boil-off models have been developed for cryogenic liquids such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), including models based on heat ingress and subsequent BOG rates and those accounting for heat transfer between the vapor and liquid phases.
“Many computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and thermodynamic boil-off models have been developed for cryogenic liquids such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), including models based on heat ingress and subsequent BOG rates and those accounting for heat transfer between the vapor and liquid phases [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [38] Miana, 2016, Comparison of evaporation rate and heat flow models for prediction of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) ageing during ship transportation, Fuel source
- cites [39] Huerta, 2019, A realistic vapour phase heat transfer model for the weathering of LNG stored in large tanks, Energy source
- cites [40] Miana, 2010, Calculation models for prediction of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) ageing during ship transportation, Appl. Energy source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationIn our related work, we tested and validated the SHV model against our experimental data for pure liquid nitrogen and LNG-like binary mixtures of methane and ethane.
“In our related work [58,59], we tested and validated the SHV model against our experimental data for pure liquid nitrogen [58] and LNG-like binary mixtures of methane and ethane [59].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThese models tend to use cubic equations of state for thermodynamic calculations, which are not optimised for the most accurate description of LNG, let alone liquid hydrogen.
“Furthermore, these models tend to use cubic equations of state for thermodynamic calculations, which are not optimised for the most accurate description of LNG, let alone liquid hydrogen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningTo correctly use this model for the description of liquid hydrogen storage and boil-off, it must adequately capture the influence of conversions between the two spin isomers, orthohydrogen and parahydrogen.
“However, to correctly use this model for the description of liquid hydrogen storage and boil-off, it must adequately capture the influence of conversions between the two spin isomers, orthohydrogen.and parahydrogen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWe have previously presented a boil-off model based on a superheated vapor assumption similar to the non-equilibrium methods presented in the literature.
“We have previously [58,59] presented a boil-off model based on a superheated vapor assumption similar to the non-equilibrium methods presented in the literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCurrently, the space industry is an important user of LH2, with long duration storage of cryogenic hydrogen being essential in orbital transfer vehicles, the upper stages of rockets, and deep space exploration probes.
“Currently, the space industry is an important user of LH 2 , with long duration storage of cryogenic hydrogen being essential in orbital transfer vehicles, the upper stages of rockets, and deep space exploration probes [29][30][31][32][33][34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [29] Haberbusch, 2004, Thermally optimized zero boil-off densified cryogen storage system for space, Cryogenics source
- cites [30] Majumdar, 2008, Numerical modeling of propellant boil-off in a cryogenic storage tank, AIP Conf. Proc. source
- cites [31] Bailey, T.E., and Fearn, R.F. (1964). Analytical and Experimental Determination of Liquid-Hydrogen Temperature Stratification, Springer. source
The authors state this as an assumption.
The liquid phase is saturated and thermally homogenous.
“The SHV model currently implemented in BoilFAST assumes the liquid phase is saturated and thermally homogenous.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The initial liquid and vapor in the tank are a saturated liquid in equilibrium with the vapor phase.
“The initial conditions of the liquid and vapor in the tank are defined based on the system pressure, assuming a saturated liquid in equilibrium with the vapor phase.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The vapor temperature is the average temperature for the vapor phase.
“The vapor temperature is taken to be the average temperature for the vapor phase.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
During self-pressurization, no venting occurs (n_relief is zero) during the pressure build-up stage.
“This ensures that n relief is zero (no venting) during the pressure build-up stage (i.e., n F,j-1 -n L -n V = 0 for all time steps).”
The paper relies on this without support.
At liquid hydrogen storage conditions, the equilibrium fraction of parahydrogen is around 99.8% (at the normal boiling point of 20.3 K).
“In particular, at the cryogenic storage conditions where liquid hydrogen is stored, the equilibrium fraction of parahydrogen is around 99.8%.”
“For liquid hydrogen at its normal boiling point (20.3K), the equilibrium para-hydrogen content is 99.8%.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Energy-balance equations use rates where the text describes changes per time step
MinorEquations (6) and (7) put enthalpy derivatives on the left, but the text says their right-hand sides equal total enthalpy changes over a time step. A derivative is a rate, not a total change; the heat and boil-off terms would need to be expressed as rates for these equations to be consistent.
“dH L dt = Q L + Q VL -n boil h boil (6 ) dH V dt = Q V -Q VL -n relie f h V + n boil h boil(7)”
“The right-hand sides of Equations ( 6) and ( 7) contain the bulk energy balances for the liquid and vapor phases, respectively; each of which is considered to equal the total enthalpy change of the respective phase over a given time step, which can be calculated using an equation of state (EOS).”
Cites
Kunz, O., & Wagner, W. (2012) · Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data · doi:10.1021/je300655b · Cited by 1,341 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This model is flexible with regards to the fluid type, utilises reference Helmholtz equations of state [60,61] for the thermodynamic property calculations and, most importantly, has physically-based parameters that are anchored by high-quality experimental data for pure fluids measured using a custom BOG apparatus.”
MethodThe solid molecular hydrogens in the condensed phase: Fundamentals and static properties
Silvera, I. F. (1980) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.52.393 · Cited by 1,208 · cited 1× · see citing works
“45 × 10−3 meV are the rotational energy distortion constants [63].”
BackgroundFundamental Equations of State for Parahydrogen, Normal Hydrogen, and Orthohydrogen
Leachman, J. W., Jacobsen, R. T., Penoncello, S. G., & Lemmon, E. W. (2009) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.3160306 · Cited by 822 · see citing works
Dong, K., Hochman, G., Zhang, Y., Sun, R., Li, H., & Liao, H. (2018) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.017 · Cited by 700 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Liquid hydrogen (LH2) [1–3] will play a key role in this transition [4] as it is clean-burning and can function as a store of energy generated from zero- or low-carbon sources, such as renewables or natural gas combined with carbon capture and storage.”
BackgroundRaab, M., Maier, S., & Dietrich, R. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.213 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Analysis of temperature and pressure changes in liquefied natural gas (LNG) cryogenic tanks
Chen, Q.-S., Wegrzyn, J. E., & Prasad, V. (2004) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2004.03.020 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Liquid hydrogen: Potential, problems, and a proposed research program
SHERIF, S. (1997) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/s0360-3199(96)00201-7 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Design of a boil-off natural gas reliquefaction control system for LNG carriers
Shin, Y., & Lee, Y. P. (2008) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.03.019 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Weathering prediction model for stored liquefied natural gas (LNG)
Migliore, C., Tubilleja, C., & Vesovic, V. (2015) · Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2015.06.056 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Experimental investigation of thermal stratification in cryogenic tanks
Kang, M., Kim, J., You, H., & Chang, D. (2018) · Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science · doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.12.017 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Effect of Insulation Thickness on Pressure Evolution and Thermal Stratification in a Cryogenic Tank
Joseph, J., Agrawal, G., Agarwal, D. K., Pisharady, J. C., & Sunil Kumar, S. (2017) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.015 · Cited by 105 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, as this stratified mass is unusable as fuel, it becomes a liability to the payload capacity of the rocket [36].”
BackgroundCylindrical cryogenic calorimeter testing of six types of multilayer insulation systems
Fesmire, J. E., & Johnson, W. L. (2018) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2017.11.004 · Cited by 103 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Fesmire and Johnson presented comp hensive heat flux and effective thermal conductivity data for 26 different MLI systems acro s the full relevant pr ssure range (fr m high vacuum to ambient pressure) [89].”
BackgroundInfluentialCalculation models for prediction of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) ageing during ship transportation
Miana, M., Hoyo, R. D., Rodrigálvarez, V., Valdés, J. R., & Llorens, R. (2010) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.023 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Barsi, S., & Kassemi, M. (2008) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2008.01.003 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Simulation of boil-off losses during transfer at a LH2 based hydrogen refueling station
Petitpas, G. (2018) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.132 · Cited by 98 · cited 7× · see citing works
“15 W/m2/K was chosen as this best matched the vapor temperature data reported by Petitpas [27].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKumar, S., Prasad, B. V. S. S. S., Venkatarathnam, G., Ramamurthi, K., & Murthy, S. S. (2006) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.08.052 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Boil off gas (BOG) management in Spanish liquid natural gas (LNG) terminals
Querol, E., Gonzalez-Regueral, B., García-Torrent, J., & García-Martínez, M. J. (2010) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.04.021 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
A non-equilibrium approach to modelling the weathering of stored Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Migliore, C., Salehi, A., & Vesovic, V. (2017) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.068 · Cited by 83 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[44] for a standard LNG storage vertical tank with a 165,000 m3 capacity.”
BackgroundNumerical simulation of natural convection and boil-off in a small size pressurized LNG storage tank
Ferrín, J. L., & Pérez-Pérez, L. J. (2020) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106840 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Gursu, S., Sherif, S. A., Veziroglu, T. N., & Sheffield, J. W. (1993) · Journal of Energy Resources Technology · doi:10.1115/1.2905997 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Numerical study of transient natural convection in a pressurized LNG storage tank
Roh, S., Son, G., Song, G.-D., & Bae, J. (2012) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.11.021 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
A realistic vapour phase heat transfer model for the weathering of LNG stored in large tanks
Huerta, F., & Vesovic, V. (2019) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.174 · Cited by 82 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This was then expanded by Huerta and Vesovic [39] to include more realistic heat transfer mechanisms in the vapor phase.”
MethodPetitpas, G., Aceves, S. M., Matthews, M. J., & Smith, J. R. (2014) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.205 · Cited by 77 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, because of its larger thermal diffusivity, the gas phase above the stored liquid hydrogen will generally be warmer than the liquid leading to the reverse, endothermic conversion of para- to ortho-hydrogen [67].”
BackgroundLin, Y., Ye, C., Yu, Y.-Y., & Bi, S.-W. (2018) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.02.066 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Krikkis, R. N. (2018) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.04.007 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Perez, F., Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Gallagher, L., Siahvashi, A., Ryu, Y., Kim, S., Kim, S. G., Johns, M. L., & May, E. F. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.119853 · Cited by 76 · cited 5× · see citing works
“We have previously [58,59] presented a boil-off model based on a superheated vapor assumption similar to the non-equilibrium methods presented in the literature.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citation(1991) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Notardonato, W. U., Swanger, A. M., Fesmire, J. E., Jumper, K. M., Johnson, W. L., & Tomsik, T. M. (2017) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/278/1/012012 · Cited by 73 · cited 3× · see citing works
“hydrogen storage experiments conducted at NASA and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [27,53,75,78].”
MethodSelf-citation(2018) · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.07.005 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Investigation on no-vent filling process of liquid hydrogen tank under microgravity condition
Ma, Y., Li, Y., Zhu, K., Wang, Y., Wang, L., & Tan, H. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.198 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Skaugen, G., Berstad, D., & Wilhelmsen, Ø. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.076 · Cited by 70 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Liquefaction processes use heterogeneous catalysts to ensure this equilibrium ratio is attained to prevent the exothermic ortho- to para-hydrogen conversion from occurring during storage [66].”
BackgroundCFD investigation of thermal and pressurization performance in LH2 tank during discharge
Wang, L., Li, Y., Li, C., & Zhao, Z. (2013) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2013.05.005 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Studies of the large-scale sea transportation of liquid hydrogen
ABE, A. (1998) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/s0360-3199(97)00032-3 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Boil-off losses along LH2 pathway
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), L., Petitpas, G., & (NNSA), U. N. N. S. A. (2018) · doi:10.2172/1466121 · Cited by 68 · cited 10× · see citing works
“In the work of Petitpas [27], a 12.5 m3 LH2 Dewar tank with a 2 m internal diameter at the Lawrence Livermore Cryogenic Hydrogen Test Facility was subjected to ambient heat ingress to measure the change in liquid volume over summer versus winter.”
MethodInfluentialLNG Technology: The Weathering in Above-Ground Storage Tanks
Pellegrini, L. A., Moioli, S., Brignoli, F., & Bellini, C. (2014) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie404128d · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Tan, H., Zhao, Q., Sun, N., & Li, Y. (2016) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.031 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Non-equilibrium thermodynamic model for liquefied natural gas storage tanks
Wang, Z., Sharafian, A., & Mérida, W. (2020) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.116412 · Cited by 64 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[46] to simulate LNG during storage and refuelling.”
BackgroundExperimental investigation on chill-down process of cryogenic flow line
Jin, L., Park, C., Cho, H., Lee, C., & Jeong, S. (2016) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2016.08.006 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Simulation study on boil-off gas minimization and recovery strategies at LNG exporting terminals
Kurle, Y. M., Wang, S., & Xu, Q. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.055 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Modelling of Boil-Off Gas in LNG Tanks: A Case Study
Adom, E., Islam, S. Z., & Ji, X. (2010) · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Qu, Y., Noba, I. S., Xu, X., Privat, R., & Jaubert, J. (2018) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.09.002 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Advanced Boil-Off Gas Studies for Liquefied Natural Gas
Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Perez, F., Heum Park, K., Gallagher, L., Warr, L., Stroda, A., Siahvashi, A., Ryu, Y., Kim, S., Kim, S. G., et al. (2021) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116735 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationNumerical study of natural convection in a liquefied natural gas tank
Roh, S., & Son, G. (2012) · Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12206-012-0820-x · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Effendy, S., Khan, M. S., Farooq, S., & Karimi, I. A. (2017) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.01.012 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Peng, J. K., & Ahluwalia, R. K. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.039 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Analysis of Thermal Stratification of Liquid Hydrogen in Rocket Propellant Tanks
Tatom, J. W., Brown, W. H., Knight, L. H., & Coxe, E. F. (1964) · Advances in Cryogenic Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0525-6_31 · Cited by 50 · cited 1× · see citing works
“If the warmer stratified layers enter the rocket propellant feed system, pump cavitation can occur, which could potentially destroy the rocket [35].”
BackgroundThol, M., Richter, M., May, E. F., Lemmon, E. W., & Span, R. (2019) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.5093800 · Cited by 50 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This model is flexible with regards to the fluid type, utilises reference Helmholtz equations of state [60,61] for the thermodynamic property calculations and, most importantly, has physically-based parameters that are anchored by high-quality experimental data for pure fluids measured using a custom BOG apparatus.”
MethodSelf-citationMawire, A. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.061 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Numerical analysis of convective flow and thermal stratification in a cryogenic storage tank
Choi, S. W., Lee, W. I., & Kim, H. S. (2017) · Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications · doi:10.1080/10407782.2016.1264771 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Miana, M., del Hoyo, R., & Rodrigálvarez, V. (2016) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.070 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Simulation on thermal stratification and de-stratification in liquefied gas tanks
Ren, J., Jian-yun, S., Liu, P., Bi, M., & Jia, K. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.116 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Passive zero-boil-off storage of liquid hydrogen for long-time space missions
Sun, X.-W., Guo, Z.-Y., & Huang, W. (2015) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.184 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Numerical modelling and flow visualization of mixing of stratified layers and rollover in LNG
Shi, J. Q., Beduz, C., & Scurlock, R. G. (1993) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/0011-2275(93)90004-8 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
An optimization study of liquid hydrogen boil-off losses
GURSU, S., LORDGOOEI, M., SHERIF, S., & VEZIROGLU, T. (1992) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/0360-3199(92)90131-f · Cited by 41 · see citing works
How liquid hydrogen production methods affect emissions in liquid hydrogen powered vehicles?
Uğurlu, A., & Öztuna, S. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.250 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Numerical investigation on subcooled pool film boiling of liquid hydrogen in different gravities
Wang, J., Li, Y., Wang, L., Xia, S., Ren, J., Mao, H., & Xu, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.079 · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The resulting temperature difference between the volume of stored liquid and the ambient environment ensures that heat ingress into the LH2 is inevitable, which can cause it to evaporate [8].”
BackgroundAnalytical and Experimental Determination of Liquid-Hydrogen Temperature Stratification
Bailey, T. E., & Fearn, R. F. (1964) · Advances in Cryogenic Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0525-6_30 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Boil-off is particularly important during atmospheric departure, where frictional drag forces result in substantial heat ingress into the containment vessel, thereby increasing vapor temperature and pressure [31].”
BackgroundThermally optimized zero boil-off densified cryogen storage system for space
Haberbusch, M. S., Stochl, R. J., & Culler, A. J. (2004) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2004.02.016 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Zuo, Z. Q., Sun, P. J., Jiang, W. B., Qin, X. J., Li, P., & Huang, Y. H. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.241 · Cited by 34 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Tools that can accurately estimate BOG production are particularly important in the context of industrial-scale LH2 storage, as the capital expense to design and implement such systems is large, and experimental testing at a relevant pilot-scale can be cost-prohibitive with the results obtained making it difficult to…”
BackgroundNumerical simulation of stratification behaviour in thermal storage tanks
Ghaddar, N., Al-Marafie, A. M. R., & Al-Kandari, A. L. (1989) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/0306-2619(89)90031-7 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Wang, L., Li, Y., Zhang, F., & Ma, Y. (2015) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2015.10.001 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Effect of para–ortho conversion on hydrogen storage system performance
Ubaid, S., Xiao, J., Zacharia, R., Chahine, R., & Bénard, P. (2014) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.101 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Boeva, O. A., Odintzov, A. A., Solovov, R. D., Abkhalimov, E. V., Zhavoronkova, K. N., & Ershov, B. G. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.187 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“At absolute zero, all the hydrogen molecules must be in a rotational ground state and thus 100% para-hydrogen [65].”
BackgroundFinal test results for the ground operations demonstration unit for liquid hydrogen
Notardonato, W. U., Swanger, A. M., Fesmire, J. E., Jumper, K. M., Johnson, W. L., & Tomsik, T. M. (2017) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2017.10.008 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationCFD Analysis of Stratification and Rollover Phenomena in an Industrial-Scale LNG Storage Tank
Saleem, A., Farooq, S., Karimi, I. A., & Banerjee, R. (2020) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02546 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Hydrogen No-Vent Fill Testing in a 34 Liter (1.2 Cubic Foot) Tank
Moran, M. E., Nyland, T. W., & Driscoll, S. L. (1992) · Advances in Cryogenic Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3368-9_59 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ground testing for the no-vent fill of cryogenic tanks - Results of tests for a 71 cubic foot tank
CHATO, D. (1993) · 29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.1993-1967 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Large scale production of densified hydrogen to the triple point and below
Swanger, A. M., Notardonato, W. U., Fesmire, J. E., Jumper, K. M., Johnson, W. L., & Tomsik, T. M. (2017) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/278/1/012013 · Cited by 22 · cited 7× · see citing works
“hydrogen storage experiments conducted at NASA and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [27,53,75,78].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEffect of microgravity on flow boiling heat transfer of liquid hydrogen in transportation pipes
Zheng, Y., Chang, H., Chen, J., Chen, H., & Shu, S. (2018) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.047 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Experimental investigation on no-vent fill process using tetrafluoromethane (CF4)
Kim, Y., Lee, C., Park, J., Seo, M., & Jeong, S. (2015) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2015.12.005 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Boil-off in long-term stored liquid hydrogen
KALANIDHI, A. (1988) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/0360-3199(88)90055-9 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Nakano, A., SHIMAZAKI, T., Sekiya, M., Shiozawa, H., Ohtsuka, K., Aoyagi, A., Iwakiri, T., Mikami, Z., Sato, M., Sugino, Y., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.02.052 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Advanced Boil-Off Gas Studies of Liquefied Natural Gas used for the Space and Energy Industries
Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Swanger, A., Park, K. H., Jusko, V., Ryu, Y., Kim, S., Kim, S. G., Zhang, D., Seo, Y., Johns, M. L., et al. (2022) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.10.028 · Cited by 18 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recently [86], the model’s performance was compared against BOG data obtained for ternary mixtures of methane, ethane, and nitrogen using our apparatus [58] and an LNG mixture used as rocket fuel conducted at Kennedy Space Centre (NASA) [87].”
MethodSelf-citationBarrón-Palos, L., Alarcon, R., Balascuta, S., Blessinger, C., Bowman, J. D., Chupp, T. E., Covrig, S., Crawford, C. B., Dabaghyan, M., Dadras, J., et al. (2011) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/j.nima.2011.07.051 · Cited by 17 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The temperature dependent equilibrium orthohydrogen–parahydrogen ratio can be calculated using Equations (1) and (2) [62].”
MethodMORAN, M., & NYLAND, T. (1992) · 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.1992-3063 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Swanger, A. M., Notardonato, W., & Jumper, K. (2015) · doi:10.1115/pvp2015-45625 · Cited by 17 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The IRAS geometric properties of the horizontal capsule tank with a 2:1 ellipsoidal head [88] and parameters used by the simulation are outlined in Table 1.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationImproved thermodynamic modelling of the no-vent fill process and correlation with experimental data
TAYLOR, W., & Chato, D. J. (1991) · AIAA Thermophysics Conference · doi:10.2514/6.1991-1379 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Numerical Modeling of Propellant Boil-Off in a Cryogenic Storage Tank
Steadman, T., Majumdar, A. K., Sass, J. P., Maroney, J. L., & Fesmire, J. E. (2007) · NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Sakamoto, Y., Kobayashi, H., Naruo, Y., Takesaki, Y., Nakajima, Y., Kabayama, K., & Sato, T. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.038 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Ground operations demonstration unit for liquid hydrogen initial test results
Notardonato, W., Johnson, W. L., Swanger, A. M., & Tomsik, T. M. (2015) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/101/1/012081 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental investigation on No Vent Fill process of cryogenic liquid
Kim, K. J., Jin, L., Kim, Y., & Jeong, S. (2017) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Integrated refrigeration and storage of LNG for compositional stability
Rose, L., Swanger, A. M., Notardonato, W. U., Fesmire, J. E., Gleeson, J., & Carro, R. (2020) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/755/1/012003 · Cited by 4 · cited 9× · see citing works
“Comparison between the BoilFAST calculations (solid curves) and experimental data (symbols) obtained from a LH2 storage tank at NASA’s Glenn Research Centre.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationThermal Modeling of Zero Boil Off Tank Experiment
Tesny, E. M., & Hauser, D. M. (2019) · AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2019 Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2019-4280 · Cited by 4 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This capability of the model to simulate storage at sub-atmospheric pressures is highly relevant to LH2 applications in microgravity environments, including the cryogenic storage systems needed for future long-term space missions [90].”
BackgroundAdvanced Liquid Natural Gas Onboard Storage System
Harper, G., & Powars, C. (2003) · doi:10.2172/835120 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Numerical modeling of propellant boil-off in a cryogenic storage tank
Majumdar, A. K., Steadman, T. E., Maroney, J. L., Sass, J. P., Fesmire, J. E., Weisend, J. G., Barclay, J., Breon, S., Demko, J., DiPirro, M., et al. (2008) · AIP Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.2908513 · Cited by 2
Cooling by conversion of para to ortho-hydrogen
Sherman, A. (1983) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Correction: Thermal Modeling of Zero Boil Off Tank Experiment
Tesny, E. M., & Hauser, D. M. (2019) · AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2019 Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2019-4280.c1
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Migliore, C. (2016). Modelling the Weathering Process of Stored Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Imperial College London. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large scale of green hydrogen storage: Opportunities and challenges
Ma, N., Zhao, W., Wang, W., Li, X., & Zhou, H. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.021 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
Hydrogen liquefaction and storage: Recent progress and perspectives
Zhang, T., Uratani, J. M., Huang, Y., Xu, L., Griffiths, S., & Ding, Y. (2023) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113204 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Manigandan, S., Praveenkumar, T. R., Ryu, J. I., Verma, T. N., & Pugazhendhi, A. (2023) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129064 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Review of the Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tank and Insulation System for the High-Power Locomotive
Kang, D., Yun, S., & Kim, B.-K. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15124357 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Thermal performance of cylindrical and spherical liquid hydrogen tanks
Wang, Z., & Mérida, W. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.11.287 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Modelling of Boil-Off and Sloshing Relevant to Future Liquid Hydrogen Carriers
Smith, J. R., Gkantonas, S., & Mastorakos, E. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15062046 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“This approach is similar to those presented in Al Ghafri et al. and Petitpas et al. [29,43].”
ResultInfluentialWang, H., Wang, B., Sun, J., Pan, Q., Luo, G., Tao, X., He, Y., Pfotenhauer, J. M., Jin, T., & Gan, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.062 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Comparative Study of Hydrogen Storage and Metal Hydride Systems: Future Energy Storage Solutions
Beyazit, N. İ. (2025) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr13051506 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The Effect of Liquid Hydrogen Tank Size on Self-Pressurization and Constant-Pressure Venting
Matveev, K. I., & Leachman, J. (2023) · Hydrogen · doi:10.3390/hydrogen4030030 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Al Ghafri et al. [4] demonstrated a comparison of predictions of the two-element method with several experimental studies involving liquid hydrogen storage.”
Wang, J., Webley, P. A., & Hughes, T. J. (2024) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124054 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
A survey on hydrogen tanks for sustainable aviation
Bagarello, S., Campagna, D., & Benedetti, I. (2024) · Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation · doi:10.1016/j.geits.2024.100224 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Wang, H., Wang, B., Xu, T., Shen, X., He, Y., Zhou, W., Pfotenhauer, J., Jin, T., & Gan, Z. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131247 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Wang, H., Bo, W., Ruize, L., Xian, S., Yingzhe, W., Quanwen, P., He, Y., Weiming, Z., & Zhihua, G. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.140 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Ha, D. W., Noh, H. W., Koo, T. H., Ko, R.-K., & Seo, Y. M. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.167 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Current progress, challenges, and future prospects in composite cryogenic hydrogen storage tanks
Mukwanje, C. A., Faik, A., & Nachtane, M. (2025) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.29872 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Kadirgama, K., Samylingam, L., Aslfattahi, N., Kiai, M. S., Kok, C. K., & Yusaf, T. F. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.413 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Naquash, A., Riaz, A., Qyyum, M. A., Aziz, M., Assareh, E., & Lee, M. (2023) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.122 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Computational Analysis of Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tanks for Aircraft Applications
Mantzaroudis, V. K., & Theotokoglou, E. E. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16062245 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Molkov, V., Ebne-Abbasi, H., & Makarov, D. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.392 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“This model was able to achieve a reliable prediction of pressure build-up in tanks for cryogenic and multiphase flows [24,51,52].”
Kangwanpongpan, T., Makarov, D., Cirrone, D., & Molkov, V. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.126 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Revisiting the cost analysis of importing liquefied green hydrogen
Choi, H., Lee, H., Han, J., & Roh, K. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.418 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Zhu, X. Y., Lee, J. H., Kim, K., Lim, C.-H., & Lee, S. H. (2024) · Case Studies in Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.csite.2024.105317 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Reducing Hydrogen Boil-Off Losses during Fuelling by Pre-Cooling Cryogenic Tank
Ghaffari-Tabrizi, F., Haemisch, J., & Lindner, D. (2022) · Hydrogen · doi:10.3390/hydrogen3020015 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“To analyse this boil-off, especially for future large-scale storage and transport applications, many numerical models were developed [9,10].”
BackgroundMethodHydrogen ortho-para conversion: process sensitivities and optimisation
O’Neill, K. T., Ghafri, S. Z. S. A., Falcão, B. D. S., Tang, L., Kozielski, K. A., & Johns, M. L. (2023) · Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification · doi:10.1016/j.cep.2023.109272 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationThe hydrogen storage capacity of carbon nano-onions fabricated by thermal chemical vapour deposition
Sahu, S., Khan, M. S., Gupta, N., Chennakesavulu, K., & Sasikumar, C. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.156 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Venus, D., Marth, A., Rieß, S., Freiberg, A. T. S., Brodt, M. W., Wensing, M., Wasserscheid, P., & Thiele, S. (2024) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202403824 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Lv, H., Chen, L., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Z., Chen, S., & Hou, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.375 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Computational design of vapor-cooled shield structure for liquid hydrogen storage tank
Zhu, X. Y., Lee, J. H., Kim, K., & Lee, S. H. (2024) · Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12206-024-0248-0 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“The inlet mass flow rate and inlet fluid temperature conditions are calculated using the BoilFAST software [28].”
Thermal performance estimation for cryogenic storage tanks: Application to liquid hydrogen
Aasen, A., Blakseth, S. S., Massing, A., Nekså, P., & Gjennestad, M. A. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.134 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Joseph et al. [22] observe that both effects increase with decreasing insulation thickness, but a crucial unknown is the rate of heat transport across the interface [23, 21, 27], which in practice is treated as a fudge factor tuned to experiments.”
Sani, A. G., Najafi, H., & Azimi, S. S. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119990 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Yu, C., Choi, M., & Chang, D. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.11.334 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Modeling and improving liquid hydrogen transfer processes
Gil-Esmendia, A., Flores, R. J., & Brouwer, J. (2025) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125779 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Rahman, A. A., Wang, H., Wang, B., Xu, T., Li, J., He, Y., Jin, T., & Gan, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.261 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Liquid Hydrogen Tank Boil-off Model for Design and Optimization
Adler, E. J., & Martins, J. R. R. A. (2025) · Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer · doi:10.2514/1.t7005 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Fernandes, S., Korsukova, E. V., Ellis, C. D., Ambrose, S., & Eastwick, C. N. (2025) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.128067 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Chung, S.-M., Ahn, H.-J., & Park, J.-C. (2023) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2023.109599 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Yu, T., & Lim, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.333 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Krishna, S., Mahant, B., Robustillo, M. D., Sreenivasan, H., & Pandey, J. S. (2024) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c03950 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Diamantakis, N., Xynopoulos, N., Sheth, J., Andrésen, J. M., & Maroto‐Valer, M. M. (2026) · Hydrogen · doi:10.3390/hydrogen7010036 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Comprehensive thermodynamic modelling and empirical analysis of boil-off behaviour in cryogenic energy carrier ships demonstrate that boil-off rates vary significantly by fuel type and storage design [127,157].”
Nuwantha, H. D. N., Jung, D.-H., & Huh, C. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.382 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Park, M., Gbadago, D. Q., Jung, H., & Hwang, S. (2025) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.134541 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Owji, A., Niknam, T., Taghavi, A., & Pourbehzadi, M. (2026) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2026.102183 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Transition metal-based materials and their catalytic influence on MgH2 hydrogen storage: A review
Gbenebor, O. P., & Popoola, A. P. I. (2023) · International Journal of Renewable Energy Development · doi:10.14710/ijred.2023.57805 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Cao, Q., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, M., Wang, P., Ge, L., Li, P., Zhao, Q., Wang, B., & Gan, Z. (2024) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.134234 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Sohail, S., Irfan, M., Ain, Q., Ibrahim, F. A., Hamdy, M. S., Issa, S. A. M., & Zakaly, H. M. H. (2025) · Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing · doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2025.109303 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Thermodynamic modeling and simulation of LH2 refueling with conditioning vessel
Klopčič, N., Schatz, M., Sartory, M., Pertl, P., Winkler, F., Drexler, A., Hermann, R., & Trattner, A. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.489 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Msweli, N., Nnachi, G. U., & Richards, C. G. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en18185035 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Wang, H., Wang, B., Ruize, L., Xian, S., Yingzhe, W., Pan, Q., He, Y., Weiming, Z., & Zhihua, G. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.044 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Dimos, D., & de Graaf, S. (2024) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2716/1/012001 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Park, S., Lee, C., Chung, S., Hwang, S., Lim, J. Y., & Chang, D. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17174415 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Preliminary Safety Assessment of a Liquid Hydrogen Storage System for Commercial Aviation
Simonetto, M., Pascoe, J.-A., & Sharpanskykh, A. (2025) · Safety · doi:10.3390/safety11010027 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“These aspects have been extensively described and modeled in publications [49,65] and manuals [48,50].”
A cryogenic tank thermodynamic process model for marine applications
Dimopoulos, G. G., Sykas, D., Kontaras, G., & Georgopoulou, C. (2025) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2025.104133 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Qu, Z., Lu, J., Ma, Z., Cai, Z., Zhang, X., & Cai, L. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.422 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Camplese, D., Scarponi, G. E., Eberwein, R., Hajhariri, A., Otremba, F., & Cozzani, V. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.534 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Boil-Off Gas Generation in Vacuum-Jacketed Valve Used in Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tank
Hwang, H.-S., Woo, S.-U., & Han, S. H. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17102341 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Nam, T., Yu, T., & Lim, Y. (2024) · Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology · doi:10.26748/ksoe.2024.050 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Al Ghafri et al. (2022) presented a model that enables heat transfer from the gas to the liquid in which the liquid has a uniform temperature distribution; the thermodynamic equilibrium state is considered in the interface region assumed as a very thin membrane, and the gas has a higher temperature…”
InfluentialSetup of a numerical methodology for the study of self-pressurization of cryogenic tanks
Rossetti, F. R., Pizzarelli, M., Pellegrini, R. C., Cavallini, E., & Bernardini, M. (2025) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2025.104059 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
CFD modelling methodology and challenges of hydrogen self-pressurisation and boil-off: A review
Korsukova, E. V., Eastwick, C. N., Fernandes, S., Ellis, C. D., & Ambrose, S. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.150263 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A 1-D model for the non-isobaric evaporation of cryogenic liquids in storage tanks
Huerta, F. A. L., Tapia, I., & Vesovic, V. (2025) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.117913 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Modeling the effects of liquid hydrogen tank operations on boil-off losses
Appel, K. R., Matveev, K. I., & Leachman, J. (2025) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2025.104161 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zhang, L., Wang, E., & Shi, J. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.025 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Kumar, L., & Sleiti, A. K. (2024) · doi:10.46855/energy-proceedings-11076 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Marques, P. A. D. M., Ahizi, S., Monteiro, F., Scheid, B., & Mendez, M. A. (2025) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.127751 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Enhancing processability and dormancy time of liquid hydrogen storage via MOF Pelletization
Park, J., Park, J., Park, T.-U., & Oh, H. (2026) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2026.120455 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Generalized lumped-parameter modeling of the self-pressurization in liquid hydrogen tanks
Siebe, D., Stops, L., Wolf, C., Sidarava, V., Primke, F., Hamacher, J., Stary, A., Rehfeldt, S., & Klein, H. (2026) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.154071 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Towhid, M. S. A., & Hossain, S. B. (2026) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2026.116850 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Rahman, A. A., Wang, B., Ji, R., Wang, H., Xu, T., Jin, T., & Gan, Z. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.483 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
SEO, Y. M., Noh, H. W., HA, D. W., KOO, T. H., & KO, R. K. (2023) · Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy · doi:10.7316/jhne.2023.34.4.342 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Evolution of thermodynamic properties of cryogenic liquids in the static storage process
Wu, Z., Chen, S., Yao, S., Yu, M., Jin, S., Tan, F., Zhao, G., & Wang, X. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.096 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kim, M.-S., & Lee, J.-H. (2025) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr13113584 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
ten Damme, L., van Put, M., & Rao, A. G. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152168 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
He, Y., Ji, R., Ye, J., Liu, T., & Yang, Z. (2025) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.129167 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Wang, H., Wang, B., Li, R., Hu, J. P., & Gan, Z. (2025) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.119687 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Zhai, Q., Wang, P., Tian, Z., Wang, K., Han, D., Chen, Y., Sun, D., Yu, B., & Zhang, W. (2026) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.130166 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Techno-economic analysis of ammonia as hydrogen carrier
Poudel, S., Tanveer, S., Fang, Z., Lee, K., Lu, Y., Reddi, K. R., Sun, P., & Elgowainy, A. (2026) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.155975 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Model-based fault detection algorithm for liquid hydrogen refueling system using CUSUM method
Jeon, G., & Kim, Y. (2024) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108878 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Simulations of large-scale zero boiloff, densification, and solidification of hydrogen
Mahony, C. P., Marchetta, J. G., & Swanger, A. M. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104182 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationOptical measurements of solid nitrogen solubility in hydrogen at cryogenic temperatures
Barwood, M. T. J., Metaxas, P. J., Falloon, P. E., Milligan, A. S. D., Wu, W., & May, E. F. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.093 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationBrief Review and Technical Insight of Liquefied Hydrogen Carriers Development
Song, W., Zhu, Z., Wan, Z., Long, C., & Liu, T. (2024) · Springer proceedings in physics · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8631-6_17 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Dynamic analysis of pressure buildup and safety measures during liquid nitrogen static storage
Wu, Z., Chen, S., Yao, S., Yu, M., Jin, S., Tan, F., Zhao, G., & Wang, X. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.019 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Gil-Esmendia, A., Mansourifilestan, M., Flores, R. J., & Brouwer, J. (2026) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse14050431 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Himona, E., & Poullikkas, A. (2026) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en19061527 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Gao, Z., Chen, L., & Wang, J. (2025) · Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications · doi:10.1115/1.4068950 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Huerta, F. A. L., & Vesovic, V. (2025) · SoftwareX · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102099 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ma, X., Chen, S., Wang, X., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., Mi, M., Shi, C., Zhang, S., & Li, J. (2024) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2787/1/012022 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Re-electrification with green hydrogen in combined cycle power plants: A case study for Mexico
Flores-Hernández, J. R., Becerra-López, H. R., de la Cruz, J., Silva-Muñoz, L. D., & Castañón, T. R. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.06.125 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mechanical analysis of a multi-layered spherical liquid hydrogen storage tank with perforation
He, X., & Yin, H. (2025) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.119195 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Innovations for scalable green hydrogen systems: a review
Alkhawlani, Q., Algburi, S., Sabeeh, S., & Alanber, M. (2026) · Energy Conversion and Management X · doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.102098 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Case study in design and transient analysis of hydrogen-propelled aircraft using direct combustion
Sielemann, M., Huete, J., Andersson, D., Nguyen, A., & Coïc, C. (2023) · AIAA AVIATION Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2023-3230 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Propellant Alternatives of Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Using Wave Rotor Pressure Exchanges
Osborne, G. F., & Gosse, R. C. (2025) · AIAA SciTech Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2025-0150 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Thermal Digital Twin of LH2 Aircraft Storage Tank
Oliet, C., Mosqueda-Otero, M., Schillaci, E., Amani, A., Rigola, J., & González, J. C. (2025) · EASN International Conference on Innovation in Aviation & Space Towards Sustainability Today & Tomorrow · doi:10.3390/engproc2025090097 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Energy efficiency of future hydrogen-based fuel supply chain routes for Germany’s maritime demand
Dave, Y., Torres, J. S. M., Esfeh, S. K., Baetcke, L., & Ehlers, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2025.1600803 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Wolf, C., Primke, F., Alekseev, A. S., Rehfeldt, S., & Klein, H. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152397 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hydrogen storage technologies for future energy systems
Zafar, F., Ajanović, T., Rashid, T., Khan, M. K. I., Khzouz, M., Rocha‐Meneses, L., Seedat, N., & Ahmed, R. A. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-33771-0.00016-2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kim, M. S., Kim, M.-S., & Lee, J.-H. (2025) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2025.104256 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Thermo-Fluid Dynamics Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Storage and Transfer Processes
Claussner, L. M., Scarponi, G. E., & Ustolin, F. (2025) · Hydrogen · doi:10.3390/hydrogen6040122 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Al Ghafri et al. [73] estimated the BOG losses from LH 2 storage as well as the heat transfer into the tank.”
Hydrogen Leakage Across an Airport Liquid Hydrogen Supply Chain
Schunkert, T., Engel, M., Leipold, A., Gelhausen, M. C., Auinger, M., & Mayer, H.-J. (2026) · Transportation research procedia · doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2026.01.021 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Lee, S.-W., Kim, Y.-H., & Choi, S. W. (2026) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.155405 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Influence of buoyancy and wall heat transfer in CFD modelling of liquefied hydrogen storage tanks
Espelund, J. R., Ervik, Å., Munkejord, S. T., Gjennestad, M. A., Brandt, L., & Netzer, C. (2026) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2026.129304 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“As a result, different strategies are employed: some studies apply correlations for infinite horizontal surfaces [6], while others introduce a constant scaling factor calibrated against experimental data [7, 3].”
Xie, F., Duan, X., Xu, P., Zhang, Z., & Li, Y. (2026) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.133049 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Swanger, A., Jusko, V., Siahvashi, A., Perez, F., Johns, M. L., & May, E. F.
- Affiliations
- Fluid Sciences and Resources Division, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- Kennedy Space Center (US)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- May, Eric F.
- Venue
- Energies
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-02-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1149
- ISSN
- 1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210351193
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 10.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
- Keywords
- liquid hydrogen, boil-off, self-pressurization, cryogenic storage tanks, heat transfer, equation of state, thermal insulation, tank geometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-30.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-30.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review