The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimization with a simulated annealing algorithm of a hybrid system for renewable energy including battery and hydrogen storage
Abstract
Abstract Wind and solar energy based hybrid systems incorporating energy storage can often provide cost effective and reliable energy alternatives to the conventional systems commonly used by remote consumers. To integrate a high level of variable wind and solar energy, energy storage is important. The primary contribution made by the present article is the development of a new efficient methodology for modeling and optimally sizing a hybrid system for renewable energy considering two energy storage devices: hydrogen (as a form of chemical storage) and batteries (as a form of electrochemical storage). To optimize the decision variable values, modified versions of the simulated annealing algorithm-based chaotic search and harmony search are developed. This is dedicated to the optimization of the supply of residential electrical load via stand-alone hybrid energy systems, so as to achieve the minimum life cycle cost of the system by continuous and integer decision variables. The proposed modified approach is used to size optimally the components of six schemes for a remote area in Iran: wind/hydrogen, solar/hydrogen, solar/wind/hydrogen, wind/battery, solar/battery, and solar/wind/battery. To determine the methodology quality, the performance of the proposed hybrid algorithm is contrasted with that for simulated annealing and hybrid harmony search and simulated annealing algorithms. The optimization results demonstrate that a wind and solar energy based hybrid system with electrochemical storage offers more cost effective and reliable energy than a hybrid system for renewable energy with chemical storage. Also, among hybrid systems, the wind/battery system is clearly advantageous economically for supplying power. The portions of life cycle cost of the wind turbine, batteries, and converter/inverter are 67%, 5%, and 28%, respectively. The relative errors between the Mean index of are shown to be at most 11%. Finally, a comparison of the Min., Max., Mean, and Std. values, in the six hybrid systems, shows that the proposed hybrid algorithm is more robust than the others considered since it has lower index values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elalfy, D. A., Gouda, E., Kotb, M. F., Bureš, V., & Sedhom, B. E. (2024) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2024.101482 · Cited by 587
Farghali, M., Osman, A. I., Chen, Z., Abdelhaleem, A., Ihara, I., Mohamed, I. M. A., Yap, P.-S., & Rooney, D. W. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-023-01587-1 · Cited by 361
Liu, Z., Sun, Y., Xing, C., Liu, J., He, Y., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, G. (2022) · Energy and AI · doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100195 · Cited by 288
Self-citationLiu, J., Chen, X., Cao, S., & Yang, H. (2019) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.080 · Cited by 268
Self-citationA metaheuristic optimization approach for energy efficiency in the IoT networks
Iwendi, C., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Gadekallu, T. R., Lakshmanna, K., Bashir, A. K., & Piran, M. J. (2021) · Software: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.2797 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, W., Maleki, A., Rosen, M. A., & Liu, J.
- Venue
- Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 163
- Pages
- 191-207
- ISSN
- 0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2885986500
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization with a simulated annealing algorithm of a hybrid system for renewable energy including battery and hydrogen storage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.112
- The paper
- Zhang, W., Maleki, A., Rosen, M. A., & Liu, J. (2018). Optimization with a simulated annealing algorithm of a hybrid system for renewable energy including battery and hydrogen storage. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.