The DOI matches its Crossref record; 126 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social, environmental, and economic consequences of integrating renewable energies in the electricity sector: a review
Open accessAbstract
The global shift from a fossil fuel-based to an electrical-based society is commonly viewed as an ecological improvement. However, the electrical power industry is a major source of carbon dioxide emissions, and incorporating renewable energy can still negatively impact the environment. Despite rising research in renewable energy, the impact of renewable energy consumption on the environment is poorly known. Here, we review the integration of renewable energies into the electricity sector from social, environmental, and economic perspectives. We found that implementing solar photovoltaic, battery storage, wind, hydropower, and bioenergy can provide 504,000 jobs in 2030 and 4.18 million jobs in 2050. For desalinization, photovoltaic/wind/battery storage systems supported by a diesel generator can reduce the cost of water production by 69% and adverse environmental effects by 90%, compared to full fossil fuel systems. The potential of carbon emission reduction increases with the percentage of renewable energy sources utilized. The photovoltaic/wind/hydroelectric system is the most effective in addressing climate change, producing a 2.11–5.46% increase in power generation and a 3.74–71.61% guarantee in share ratios. Compared to single energy systems, hybrid energy systems are more reliable and better equipped to withstand the impacts of climate change on the power supply.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Karmaker, A. K., Ahmed, M. R., Hossain, M. A., & Sikder, M. M. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.035 · Cited by 200
RetractedRenewable energy resources: current status, future prospects and their enabling technology
Ellabban, O., Abu-Rub, H., & Blaabjerg, F. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.113 · Cited by 3,134
Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review
Fawzy, S., Osman, A. I., Doran, J., & Rooney, D. W. (2020) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w · Cited by 1,522
Self-citationUtilising green and bluespace to mitigate urban heat island intensity
Gunawardena, K. R., Wells, M. J., & Kershaw, T. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.158 · Cited by 1,433
Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review
Chen, L., Msigwa, G., Yang, M., Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P.-S. (2022) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01435-8 · Cited by 1,326
Self-citationJacobson, M. Z., Delucchi, M. A., Bauer, Z. A. F., Goodman, S. C., Chapman, W. E., Cameron, M. A., Bozonnat, C., Chobadi, L., Clonts, H. A., Enevoldsen, P., et al. (2017) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005 · Cited by 1,142
Das, H. S., Rahman, M. M., Li, S., & Tan, C. W. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109618 · Cited by 1,140
Rahman, A., Farrok, O., & Haque, M. M. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112279 · Cited by 1,105
Cost, environmental impact, and resilience of renewable energy under a changing climate: a review
Osman, A. I., Chen, L., Yang, M., Msigwa, G., Farghali, M., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P.-S. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01532-8 · Cited by 1,048
Self-citationReview of software tools for hybrid renewable energy systems
Sinha, S., & Chandel, S. S. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.035 · Cited by 991
Cited by
Osman, A. I., Chen, Z., Elgarahy, A. M., Farghali, M., Mohamed, I. M. A., Priya, A. K., Hawash, H. B., & Yap, P. (2024) · Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research · doi:10.1002/aesr.202400011 · Cited by 365
Self-citationGreen building practices to integrate renewable energy in the construction sector: a review
Chen, L., Hu, Y., Wang, R., Li, X., Chen, Z., Hua, J., Osman, A. I., Farghali, M., Huang, L., Li, J., et al. (2024) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-023-01675-2 · Cited by 280
Self-citationBiomass Energy and Biofuels: Perspective, Potentials, and Challenges in the Energy Transition
Mignogna, D., Szabó, M., Ceci, P., & Avino, P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16167036 · Cited by 248
Conversion of lignocellulosic biomass-derived compounds to 2-ethylhexanol: a review
Sun, C., Zhang, S., Gao, B., Yang, T., Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Zhou, H., & Chen, Z. (2024) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-024-01710-w · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Farghali, M., Osman, A. I., Chen, Z., Abdelhaleem, A., Ihara, I., Mohamed, I. M. A., Yap, P.-S., & Rooney, D. W.
- Venue
- Environmental Chemistry Letters
- Published
- 2023-03-24
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1381-1418
- ISSN
- 1610-3653 (ISSN-L)
- 1610-3661
- OpenAlex
- W4360850695
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 126
- FWCI
- 16.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social, environmental, and economic consequences of integrating renewable energies in the electricity sector: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10311-023-01587-1
- The paper
- Farghali, M., Osman, A. I., Chen, Z., Abdelhaleem, A., Ihara, I., Mohamed, I. M. A., Yap, P.-S., & Rooney, D. W. (2023). Social, environmental, and economic consequences of integrating renewable energies in the electricity sector: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01587-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
