The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineering of Sodium-Ion Batteries: Opportunities and Challenges
Open accessAbstract
The recent proliferation of sustainable and eco-friendly renewable energy engineering is a hot topic of worldwide significance with regard to combatting the global environmental crisis. To curb renewable energy intermittency and integrate renewables into the grid with stable electricity generation, secondary battery-based electrical energy storage (EES) technologies are regarded as the most promising solution, due to their prominent capability to store and harvest green energy in a safe and cost-effective way. Due to the wide availability and low cost of sodium resources, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are regarded as a promising alternative for next-generation large-scale EES systems. This review discusses in detail the key differences between lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and SIBs for different application requirements and describes the current understanding of SIBs. By comparing technological evolutions among LIBs, lead-acid batteries (LABs), and SIBs, the advantages of SIBs are unraveled. This review also offers highlights on commercial achievements that have been realized based on current SIB technology, focusing on an introduction of five major SIB companies, each with SIB chemistry and technology, as well as commercialized SIB products. Last but not least, it discusses outlooks and key challenges for the commercialization of next-generation SIBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries
Tarascon, J.-M., & Armand, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104644 · Cited by 21,130
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices
Dunn, B., Kamath, H., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1212741 · Cited by 15,072
Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage
Larcher, D., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2015) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2085 · Cited by 7,872
Research Development on Sodium-Ion Batteries
Yabuuchi, N., Kubota, K., Dahbi, M., & Komaba, S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500192f · Cited by 6,478
Electrochemical Energy Storage for Green Grid
Yang, Z., Zhang, J., Kintner-Meyer, M. C. W., Lu, X., Choi, D., Lemmon, J. P., & Liu, J. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100290v · Cited by 5,250
Slater, M. D., Kim, D., Lee, E., & Johnson, C. S. (2013) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201200691 · Cited by 4,518
Progress in electrical energy storage system: a critical review
Chen, H., Cong, T. N., Yang, W., Tan, C., Li, Y., & Ding, Y. (2009) · Progress in Natural Science · doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.07.014 · Cited by 3,746
Insertion Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
Winter, M., Besenhard, J. O., Spahr, M. E., & Novák, P. (1998) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-4095(199807)10:10<725::aid-adma725>3.0.co;2-z · Cited by 2,965
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, L., Zhang, T., Li, W., Li, T., Zhang, L., Zhang, X., & Wang, Z.
- Venue
- Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 172-183
- ISSN
- 2095-8099 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4281571417
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 19.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering of Sodium-Ion Batteries: Opportunities and Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eng.2021.08.032
- The paper
- Zhao, L., Zhang, T., Li, W., Li, T., Zhang, L., Zhang, X., & Wang, Z. (2023). Engineering of Sodium-Ion Batteries: Opportunities and Challenges. Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.08.032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
