The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Sailfish Optimizer: A novel nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problems
Abstract
Abstract Nature-inspired optimization algorithms, especially swarm based algorithms (SAs), solve many scientific and engineering problems due to their flexibility and simplicity. These algorithms are applicable for optimization problems without structural modifications. This work presents a novel nature-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithm, called SailFish Optimizer (SFO), which is inspired by a group of hunting sailfish. This method consists of two tips of populations, sailfish population for intensification of the search around the best so far and sardines population for diversification of the search space. The SFO algorithm is evaluated on 20 well-known unimodal and multimodal mathematical functions to test different characteristics of the algorithm. In addition, SFO is compared with the six state-of-art metaheuristic algorithms in low and high dimensions. It also indicates competitive results for improvement of exploration and exploitation phases, avoidance of local optima, and high speed convergence especially on large-scale global optimization. The SFO algorithm outperforms the best algorithms in the literature on the majority of the test functions and it shows the statistically significant difference among other algorithms. Moreover, the SFO algorithm shows significantly great results for non-convex, non-separable and scalable test functions. Eventually, the promising results on five real world optimization problems indicate that the SFO is applicable for problem solving with constrained and unknown search spaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No free lunch theorems for optimization
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585893 · Cited by 14,237
Holland, J. H. (1992) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66 · Cited by 5,764
Cited by
Rajwar, K., Deep, K., & Das, S. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10470-y · Cited by 687
Houssein, E. H., Saad, M. R., Hashim, F. A., Shaban, H., & Hassaballah, M. (2020) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103731 · Cited by 499
Jia, H., Peng, X., & Lang, C. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115665 · Cited by 417
Heap-based optimizer inspired by corporate rank hierarchy for global optimization
Askari, Q., Saeed, M., & Younas, I. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113702 · Cited by 380
War Strategy Optimization Algorithm: A New Effective Metaheuristic Algorithm for Global Optimization
Ayyarao, T. S. L. V., Ramakrishna, N. S. S., Elavarasan, R. M., Polumahanthi, N., Rambabu, M., Saini, G., Khan, B., & Alatas, B. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3153493 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Shadravan, S., Naji, H. R., & Bardsiri, V. K.
- Venue
- Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 80
- Pages
- 20-34
- ISSN
- 0952-1976 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914717758
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Sailfish Optimizer: A novel nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.01.001
- The paper
- Shadravan, S., Naji, H. R., & Bardsiri, V. K. (2019). The Sailfish Optimizer: A novel nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.01.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.