Computational implementation of the PPR potential-based cohesive model in ABAQUS: Educational perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The fracture parameters are adopted from Park and Paulino (2012) and kept fixed throughout the study so that differences among the healing cases arise exclusively from the healing kinetics.
“We adopt the fracture parameters from Park and Paulino (2012) and keep them fixed throughout the study so that differences among the healing cases arise exclusively from the healing kinetics.”
From A thermodynamically consistent mixed-mode cohesive zone model for fracture of self-healing materials (2026) · cites this paper as Park and Paulino (2012)
The finite element implementation follows the approach outlined by Park and Paulino (2012).
“This implementation follows the approach outlined by Park and Paulino (2012).”
From A thermodynamically consistent mixed-mode cohesive zone model for fracture of self-healing materials (2026) · cites this paper as Park and Paulino (2012)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A thermodynamically consistent mixed-mode cohesive zone model for fracture of self-healing materials
Giraldo-Londoño, O., Spring, D. W., Muñetón-López, R. A., & Paulino, G. H. (2026) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7528848
Self-citation
- Authors
- Park, K., & Paulino, G. H.
- Affiliations
- Yonsei University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Park, Kyoungsoo
- ORCID
- Park, Kyoungsoo
- Venue
- Engineering Fracture Mechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 93
- Pages
- 239-262
- ISSN
- 0013-7944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042815049
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Engineering Fracture Mechanics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Numerical methods in engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Fatigue and fracture mechanics
- Keywords
- cohesive zone model, user element subroutine, ABAQUS, fracture mechanics, cohesive elements, crack propagation, finite element implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
