CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structural health monitoring and reliability estimation: Long span truss bridge application with environmental monitoring data

Catbas, F. Necati, Susoy, Melih, Frangopol, Dan M.·2008·Engineering Structures
DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Imai, 2001, Reliability-based assessment of suspension bridges: Application to the innoshima bridge, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 6, 398, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(398) · DOI
  2. Moon FL, Aktan AE. Structural identification of constructed systems and the impact of epistemic uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on bridge maintenance, safety, and management. 2006 · DOI
  3. Ang, 2005, Modeling and analysis of uncertainties for risk-informed decisions in infrastructures engineering, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1, 19, 10.1080/15732470412331289350 · DOI
  4. De Leon D, Ang AHS, Manjarrez L. Structural reliability of the tampico bridge under wind loading. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on bridge maintenance, safety, and management. 2006 · DOI
  5. Aktan, 2000, Issues in infrastructure health monitoring for management, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 126, 711, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:7(711) · DOI
  6. Proceedings. The 1st International conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructure. 2003
  7. Proceedings. The 2nd international conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructure. 2005
  8. Proceedings. World forum on smart materials and smart structures technology. 2007
  9. Proceedings. 5th international workshop on structural health monitoring. 2005
  10. Proceedings. SPIE: Smart structures and materials & nondestructive evaluation and health monitoring conference. 2007
  11. Susoy M, Catbas FN, Frangopol DM. Implementation of structural reliability concepts for structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 4th world conference on structural control and monitoring. 2006
  12. Catbas FN, Grimmelsman KA, Aktan AE. Structural identification of the commodore barry bridge. In: Proceedings of SPIE, nondestructive evaluation of highways, utilities, and pipelines IV. 2000. pp. 84–97 · DOI
  13. Catbas, 2007, Limitations in structural identification of large constructed structures, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 133, 1051, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:8(1051) · DOI
  14. Zhao, 2002, Second-order third-moment reliability method, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 128, 1087, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1087) · DOI
  15. Ellingwood, 1981, Wind and snow load statistics for probabilistic design, Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE), 107, 1345, 10.1061/JSDEAG.0006152 · DOI
  16. Catbas FN, Pervizpour M, Grimmelsman KA, Aktan AE. The health monitoring paradigm for infrastructure systems. In: Proceedings of the workshop on structural health monitoring and diagnostics of bridge infrastructure. San Diego (La Jolla, CA): University of California; 2003
  17. Grimmelsman KA. Instrumented monitoring of a reinforced concrete slab on steel stringer highway bridge through construction: steel elements. Masters thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Cincinnati (OH): University of Cincinnati; 1997
  18. Catbas, 2002, Condition and damage assessment: Issues and some promising indices, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 128, 1026, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1026) · DOI
  19. Imai, 2002, System reliability of suspension bridges, Structural Safety, 24, 219, 10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00027-9 · DOI
  20. Frangopol, 2000, Geometrically nonlinear finite element reliability analysis of structural systems. II: Applications, Computers and Structures, 77, 693, 10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00011-0 · DOI
  21. Frangopol, 2004, Reliability of long span bridges based on design experience with the Honshu–Shikoku bridges, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60, 373, 10.1016/S0143-974X(03)00117-2 · DOI
  22. Ellingwood, 2005, Risk informed condition assessment of civil infrastructure: State of practice and research issues, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1, 7, 10.1080/15732470412331289341 · DOI
  23. Frangopol, 2007, Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Taylor & Francis, 3, 29, 10.1080/15732470500253164 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 374

Metadata

Authors
Catbas, F. N., Susoy, M., & Frangopol, D. M.
Venue
Engineering Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
2347-2359
ISSN
0141-0296
DOI
10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.013
Cited by
374
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review