The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New advancements, challenges and opportunities of multi-storey modular buildings – A state-of-the-art review
Abstract
Abstract Modular construction offers faster and safer manufacturing, better predictability to completion time, superior quality, less workers on site, less resource wastage, and a more environmentally friendly solution than the conventional construction process. Despite having several advantages of modular construction, the private sector still relies heavily on the traditional on-site construction method. To understand the scientific reason behind this situation, this paper critically reviews the recent developments, performances, challenges and future opportunities of modular buildings. Modular constructions are extensively used for low-rise buildings and further attracts strong interest for multi-storey building structures. Prefabricated modules demonstrated satisfactory performance under static, dynamic impact, cyclic, seismic, blast, fire and long-term sustained loading, and offer environmental, economic and social benefits. The acceptance and application of modular construction will further spread with the development of design guidelines, more skilled workers, addressing handing and transportation difficulties, and the development of novel interlocking connections between modules. Recently, composite materials demonstrated high potential to manufacture prefabricated building modules. In Australia, it is expected that modular construction will increase from the current stage of 3% to 5–10% by year 2030.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review on buildings energy consumption information
Pérez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J., & Pout, C. (2008) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.007 · Cited by 6,649
Quale, J., Eckelman, M. J., Williams, K. W., Sloditskie, G., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2012) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00424.x · Cited by 220
Connections for steel–timber hybrid prefabricated buildings. Part I: Experimental tests
Loss, C., Piazza, M., & Zandonini, R. (2016) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.002 · Cited by 194
Cited by
Wang, M., Wang, C. C., Sepasgozar, S., & Zlatanova, S. (2020) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings10110204 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferdous, W., Bai, Y., Ngo, T. D., Manalo, A., & Mendis, P.
- Venue
- Engineering Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 183
- Pages
- 883-893
- ISSN
- 0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912541820
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.