The influence of cross-section variation on bending stiffness assessment in existing timber structures
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-destructive testing techniques are commonly used to estimate the mechanical properties of standing trees, logs, sawn timber and to evaluate existing timber structures.
“Non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques are commonly used to estimate the mechanical properties of standing trees, logs, sawn timber and to evaluate existing timber structures [25 -32].”
From Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes (2023) · cites this paper as [31]
The standard error estimating MOEglo12 from longitudinal vibration Edyn was 1026 N mm^-2 in this study, higher than 579 N mm^-2 reported by the same authors.
“and the standard error of 1026 N mm 2 was higher than the 579 N mm 2 reported by the same authors.”
From Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes (2023) · cites this paper as [31]
The R2 estimating MOEglo12 from longitudinal vibration Edyn was 0.71 in this study, lower than 0.87 reported for recovered structural Salzmann pine timber.
“the R 2 estimating MOEglo12 from longitudinal vibration Edyn (0.71) was lower than the 0.87 obtained in recovered structural Salzmann pine timber [31]”
From Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes (2023) · cites this paper as [31]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Osuna-Sequera, C., Llana, D. F., Íñiguez-González, G., & Arriaga, F.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Osuna-Sequera, Carlos
- Venue
- Engineering Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 204
- Pages
- 110082
- ISSN
- 0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2994699674
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Engineering Structures (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BIA 2014-55089-P)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
- Keywords
- timber structures, bending stiffness, static modulus of elasticity, non-destructive testing, acoustic testing, ultrasound, stress waves, vibration, Pinus nigra subsp. salzmannii, historic timber structures, structure confirmation, cross-section variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
