The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of convolutional neural network-based structural condition assessment techniques
Open accessAbstract
Abstract With recent advances in non-contact sensing technology such as cameras, unmanned aerial and ground vehicles, the structural health monitoring (SHM) community has witnessed a prominent growth in deep learning-based condition assessment techniques of structural systems. These deep learning methods rely primarily on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The CNN networks are trained using a large number of datasets for various types of damage and anomaly detection and post-disaster reconnaissance. The trained networks are then utilized to analyze newer data to detect the type and severity of the damage, enhancing the capabilities of non-contact sensors in developing autonomous SHM systems. In recent years, a broad range of CNN architectures has been developed by researchers to accommodate the extent of lighting and weather conditions, the quality of images, the amount of background and foreground noise, and multiclass damage in the structures. This paper presents a detailed literature review of existing CNN-based techniques in the context of infrastructure monitoring and maintenance. The review is categorized into multiple classes depending on the specific application and development of CNNs applied to data obtained from a wide range of structures. The challenges and limitations of the existing literature are discussed in detail at the end, followed by a brief conclusion on potential future research directions of CNN in structural condition assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks
Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., & Chen, L.-C. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00474 · Cited by 28,755
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11946 · Cited by 17,072
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
(2016) · Cited by 11,679
Cited by
Machine Learning for Structural Engineering: A State-of-the-Art Review
Thai, H.-T. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 · Cited by 748
Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M., & Girolami, M. (2022) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/14759217211036880 · Cited by 607
Hassani, S., & Dackermann, U. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23042204 · Cited by 492
Jia, J., & Li, Y. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23218824 · Cited by 182
“At the algorithm level, two papers target CNN [37,88], two artificial intelligence [89,90], and one proposes a new machine learning paradigm [91].”
BackgroundVibration-based multiclass damage detection and localization using long short-term memory networks
Sony, S., Gamage, S., Sadhu, A., & Samarabandu, J. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.088 · Cited by 140
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sony, S., Dunphy, K., Sadhu, A., & Capretz, M.
- Venue
- Engineering Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 226
- Pages
- 111347
- ISSN
- 0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093468414
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 117
- FWCI
- 11.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of convolutional neural network-based structural condition assessment techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111347
- The paper
- Sony, S., Dunphy, K., Sadhu, A., & Capretz, M. (2021). A systematic review of convolutional neural network-based structural condition assessment techniques. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.