Cited by 19Structural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisWood Treatment and PropertiesComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization

Experimental and numerical investigations of two-way LVL–concrete composite plates with various support conditions

Open access
Jaaranen, Joonas, Fink, Gerhard·2022·Engineering Structures

Abstract

Design of modern timber floors is often governed by the vibration serviceability requirements. One way to improve vibration serviceability is through the design of two-way floor systems. In this paper, the behaviour of two-way LVL–concrete composite plates and a plate strip is investigated experimentally, with an emphasis on the performance of proposed dovetail joint for connecting the adjacent LVL panels. The investigations consist of the experimental modal analysis and static load deformation tests, performed under multiple support conditions. The results show a significant two-way action, indicated by about 45% higher fundamental natural frequency when four edges are supported instead of two. The point load deflection in the centre of the plate was reduced of about 9%. Furthermore, a numerical model for two-way TCC plates was developed and results show a wide agreement with the experimental behaviour, except for discrepancies related to deflections on the plate edge. The results from the experimental and numerical investigations indicate that the dovetail joint can produce a stiff connection, such that the LVL layer could be regarded as continuous in the connected direction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114019

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Zhang B, Rasmussen B, Jorissen A, Harte A. Comparison of vibrational comfort assessment criteria for design of timber floors among the European countries. Eng Struct 2013;52:592-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.028. · DOI
  2. Weckendorf J, Toratti T, Smith I, Tannert T. Vibration serviceability performance of timber floors. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 2015;74(3):353-67. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00107-015-0976-z. · DOI
  3. Smith I. Vibrations of timber floors: Serviceability aspects. In: Thelandersson S, Larsen HJ, editors. Timber engineering. West Sussex: Wiley; 2003, p. 241-66.
  4. Zöllig S, Frangi A, Franke S, Muster M. Timber structures 3.0 -new technology for multiaxial slim, high performance timber structures. In: Proceedings of WCTE, World Conference on Timber Engineering. Vienna, Austria; 2016.
  5. Maurer B, Maderebner R, Zingerle P, Färberböck I, Flach M. Point-supported flat slabs with clt-panels. In: WTCE, World Conference on Timber Engineering. Seoul, Republic of Korea; 2018.
  6. Asselstine J, Lam F, Zhang C. New edge connection technology for cross laminated timber (CLT) floor slabs promoting two-way action. Eng Struct 2021;233:111777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111777. · DOI
  7. Loebus S, Dietsch P, Winter S. Two-way spanning CLT-concrete-composite- slabs. In: Proceedings of INTER -International Network on Timber Engineering Research. Kyoto, Japan; 2017.
  8. Kreis B. Two-way spanning timber-concrete composite slabs made of beech laminated veneer lumber with steel tube connection (Phd Thesis), ETH Zürich; 2021.
  9. Yeoh D, Fragiacomo M, Franceschi MD, Boon KH. State of the art on timber-concrete composite structures: Literature review. J Struct Eng 2011;137(10):1085-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000353. · DOI
  10. Dias AMPG. Analysis of the nonlinear behavior of timber-concrete connections. J Struct Eng 2012;138(9):1128-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x. 0000523. · DOI
  11. Dias A, Schänzlin J, Dietsch P, editors. A state-of-the-art report by COST action FP1402 / WG. Vol. 4. Shaker Verlag; 2018.
  12. Di Nino S, Gregori A, Fragiacomo M. Experimental and numerical inves- tigations on timber-concrete connections with inclined screws. Eng Struct 2020;209:109993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109993. · DOI
  13. Derikvand M, Fink G. Deconstructable connector for TCC floors using self- tapping screws. J Build Eng 2021;42:102495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe. 2021.102495. · DOI
  14. Khorsandnia N, Schänzlin J, Valipour H, Crews K. Coupled finite element- finite difference formulation for long-term analysis of timber-concrete composite structures. Eng Struct 2015;96:139-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct. 2015.03.047. · DOI
  15. Khorsandnia N, Valipour H, Bradford M. Deconstructable timber-concrete com- posite beams with panelised slabs: Finite element analysis. Constr Build Mater 2018;163:798-811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.169. · DOI
  16. Thompson EG, Vanderbilt M, Goodman J. FEAFLO: A program for the analysis of layered wood systems. Comput Struct 1977;7(2):237-48. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0045-7949(77)90042-6. · DOI
  17. Latham CT, Toledano A, Murakami H, Seible F. A shear-deformable two- layer plate element with interlayer slip. Internat J Numer Methods Engrg 1988;26(8):1769-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620260807. · DOI
  18. Jaaranen J, Fink G. Experimental and numerical investigations of a timber- concrete dovetail splice joint. J Build Eng 2021;43:103179. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103179. · DOI
  19. Jaaranen J, Fink G. Frictional behaviour of timber-concrete contact pairs. Constr Build Mater 2020;243:118273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat. 2020.118273. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Jaaranen J, Fink G. Cohesive-frictional interface model for timber-concrete contacts. Int J Solids Struct 2021;111174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr. 2021.111174. · DOI
  21. Ewins D. Modal testing: theory, practice and application. second ed.. Wiley; 2009.
  22. Brown DL, Allemang RJ, Zimmerman R, Mergeay M. Parameter estimation techniques for modal analysis. SAE technical paper series, SAE International; 1979, http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/790221. · DOI
  23. Phillips A, Allemang R. Topics in modal analysis II, Vol. 8. Springer; 2014, p. 29- 41, Ch. Normalization of Experimental Modal Vectors to Remove Modal Vector Contamination.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaaranen, J., & Fink, G.
Affiliations
Aalto University (FI)
Corresponding author
Jaaranen, Joonas
Venue
Engineering Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
256
Pages
114019
ISSN
0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214811131
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Engineering Structures (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Keywords
laminated veneer lumber, timber-concrete composite structures, dovetail joints, support conditions, vibration serviceability, natural frequencies, deflection, plate strips, numerical modeling, floor systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review