CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEU Law and Policy AnalysisAgricultural Economics and Policy

How to design a border adjustment for the European Union Emissions Trading System?

Open access
Monjon, Stéphanie, Quirion, Philippe·2010·Energy Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weaker forms of border adjustment are less efficient at preventing leakage than full border adjustment.

    “The next four scenarios represent various weaker forms of border adjustments, which are less efficient at preventing leakage but may be chosen nevertheless”

    From Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation? (2011) · cites this paper as Monjon and Quirion, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monjon, S., & Quirion, P.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Quirion, Philippe
ORCID
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
5199-5207
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.005
OpenAlex
W3122190648
Cited by
109
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
27.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Energy Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
Keywords
border adjustment, EU Emissions Trading System, carbon leakage, competitiveness, free allowances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review