Cited by 175Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

Assessing the impact of policy interventions on the adoption of plug-in electric vehicles: an agent-based model

Silvia, Chris, Krause, Rachel M.·2016·Energy Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silvia, C., & Krause, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Silvia, Chris
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
96
Pages
105-118
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2415967570
Cited by
175
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Energy Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Brigham Young University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
plug-in electric vehicles, electric vehicle adoption, government subsidies, battery electric vehicles, technology awareness, urban transport, agent-based modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review