The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatializing energy justice
Open accessAbstract
This paper introduces the concept of spatial justice and inequality to understandings of energy poverty and vulnerability. By applying an explicitly spatial lens to conceptualize energy poverty as a form of injustice, it contributes to debates in the domain of ‘energy justice’, where previous examinations of energy deprivation through a justice framing have focused on inequalities between social groups and often marginalized questions of spatial difference. We start from the premise that geographic disparities in the risk and incidence of domestic energy deprivation are a key component of energy justice. An extensive literature review has allowed us to highlight the spatial and temporal variation of cross-sectoral and entire-energy-chain injustices that lead to elevated energy poverty risks. These processes contribute to the rise of energy injustices via four mechanisms – which we term landscapes of material deprivation, geographic underpinnings of energy affordability, vicious cycles of vulnerability, and spaces of misrecognition – operating at a multiplicity of scales. While lending some support to area-based approaches towards energy poverty alleviation, our findings also suggest that such policies alone may marginalize the underlying structural dynamics that (re)produce spatial inequalities. Therefore, achieving energy justice necessitates broader interventions in the fundamental driving forces of spatial inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013) · Nursing & Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.12048 · Cited by 8,327
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613 · Cited by 6,543
Justice and the Politics of Difference
(2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4g4q · Cited by 2,872
Energy justice: A conceptual review
Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004 · Cited by 2,116
Carey, G. W., & Harvey, D. (1975) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/213551 · Cited by 1,941
Penfold, M. E. (1974) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803857400800337 · Cited by 1,929
Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications
Sovacool, B. K., & Dworkin, M. H. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002 · Cited by 1,415
Defining environmental justice : theories, movements, and nature
Schlosberg, D. (2007) · Cited by 1,284
Bouzarovski, S., & Petrova, S. (2015) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.06.007 · Cited by 1,127
Self-citationFrom Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a “Postsocialist” Age
(2014) · Justice Interruptus · doi:10.4324/9781315822174-8 · Cited by 1,121
Cited by
Williams, S., & Doyon, A. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.001 · Cited by 336
(2021) · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abd78c · Cited by 251
Upscaling urban data science for global climate solutions
Creutzig, F., Lohrey, S., Bai, X., Baklanov, A., Dawson, R., Dhakal, S., Lamb, W. F., McPhearson, T., Minx, J., Munoz, E., et al. (2019) · Global Sustainability · doi:10.1017/sus.2018.16 · Cited by 137
(2021) · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101996 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouzarovski, S., & Simcock, N.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 640-648
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2604155764
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 13.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatializing energy justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.064
- The paper
- Bouzarovski, S., & Simcock, N. (2017). Spatializing energy justice. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.