The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Justice in energy transitions
Abstract
Abstract This paper argues that transitions research more broadly needs to take more account of justice in its analysis. This paper draws primarily from environmental and energy justice literature to engage with the concept of justice in transitions research, as it seeks justice for people, communities, and the non-human environment from negative environmental impacts. This is achieved through different forms of justice: distributive, procedural, and recognition. Our paper concludes with reflections upon the application of a justice approach to sustainability transitions research and offer insights into a potentially new research agenda.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events
Arthur, W. B. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234208 · Cited by 7,489
Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03610-150420 · Cited by 4,764
Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 · Cited by 3,763
Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies
Healey, P. (2006) · doi:10.25405/ncl.34571748.v1 · Cited by 2,484
Energy justice: A conceptual review
Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004 · Cited by 2,116
A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243904271724 · Cited by 1,854
Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature
Schlosberg, D. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001 · Cited by 1,796
Geels, F. W. (2014) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276414531627 · Cited by 1,636
Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications
Sovacool, B. K., & Dworkin, M. H. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002 · Cited by 1,415
Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340 · Cited by 1,401
Cited by
Kaljonen, M., Kortetmäki, T., & Tribaldos, T. (2023) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.100688 · Cited by 40
Holmén, J., Williams, S., & Holmberg, J. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102522 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, S., & Doyon, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 31
- Pages
- 144-153
- ISSN
- 2210-4224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2906828572
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 12.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Justice in energy transitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.001
- The paper
- Williams, S., & Doyon, A. (2019). Justice in energy transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
