CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition

Sovacool, Benjamin K., Kivimaa, Paula, Hielscher, Sabine, Jenkins, Kirsten·2017·Energy Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.037
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.037

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Blowers, 1994, Power, politics and environmental inequality: a theoretical and empirical analysis of the process of ‘peripheralisation’, Environ. Politics, 3, 197, 10.1080/09644019408414139 · DOI
  2. Al-Wakeel, 2016, State estimation of medium voltage distribution networks using smart meter measurements, Appl. Energy, 184, 207, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.010 · DOI
  3. Balta-Ozkan, 2014, A comparison of consumer perceptions towards smart homes in the UK, Germany and Italy: reflections for policy and future research, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 26, 1176, 10.1080/09537325.2014.975788 · DOI
  4. Barnicoat, 2015, The ageing population and smart metering: a field study of householders’ attitudes and behaviours towards energy use in Scotland, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 9, 107, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.020 · DOI
  5. Bellantuono, 2014, Comparing Smart Grid Policies in the USA and EU, Law Innov. Technol., 6, 221, 10.5235/17579961.6.2.221 · DOI
  6. Bradley, 2016, Motivating energy conservation in organisations: smart metering and the emergence and diffusion of social norms, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 28, 435, 10.1080/09537325.2015.1099625 · DOI
  7. Brignal, 2016, Smart meters: an energy-saving revolution or just plain dumb?, Guardian
  8. Buchanan, 2015, The question of energy reduction: the problem(s) with feedback, Energy Policy, 77, 89, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.008 · DOI
  9. Buchanan, 2016, The British public's perception of the UK smart metering initiative: threats and opportunities, Energy Policy, 91, 87, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.003 · DOI
  10. Chilvers, 2016, Participation in transition(s): reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse, J. Environ. Policy Plan., 18, 585, 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1110483 · DOI
  11. Clark, 2016, MPs warned of sabotage threat from smart meter hackers, Financ. Times
  12. Darby, S., 2009. Implementing article 13 of the energy services directive and defining the purpose of new metering infrastructures. In: Proceedings of the European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Summer Study. Paper (2262).
  13. Darby, 2008, Energy feedback in buildings: improving the infrastructure for demand reduction, Build. Res. Inf., 36, 499, 10.1080/09613210802028428 · DOI
  14. Darby, 2010, Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement?, Build. Res. Inf., 38, 442, 10.1080/09613218.2010.492660 · DOI
  15. Engels, 2015, The micro smart grid as a materialised imaginary within the German energy transition, Energy Res. Social. Sci., 9, 35, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.024 · DOI
  16. Gosden, 2015, Energy smart meter roll-out may be 'costly failure', MPs warn, Telegraph
  17. Gosden, 2015, One in 10 energy smart meters doesn't work, Telegraph
  18. Groves, 2016, The grit in the oyster: using energy biographies to question socio-technical imaginaries of ‘smartness', J. Responsible Innov., 3, 4, 10.1080/23299460.2016.1178897 · DOI
  19. Hamilton, 2013, Energy epidemiology: a new approach to end-use energy demand research, Build. Res. Inf., 41, 482, 10.1080/09613218.2013.798142 · DOI
  20. Hess, 2014, Smart meters and public acceptance: comparative analysis and governance implications, Health, Risk Soc., 16, 243, 10.1080/13698575.2014.911821 · DOI
  21. Jenkins, 2015, An overview of the smart grid in Great Britain, Engineering, 1, 413, 10.15302/J-ENG-2015112 · DOI
  22. Kahma, 2017, The rejection of innovations? Rethinking technology diffusion and the non-use of smart energy services in Finland, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 34, 27, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.024 · DOI
  23. Kotter, 2013, The developing landscape of electric vehicles and smart grids: a smart future?, Int. J. Environ. Stud., 70, 719, 10.1080/00207233.2013.829322 · DOI
  24. Liddell, 2015, Human factors in energy efficient housing: insights from a Northern Ireland pocket neighbourhood, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 10, 19, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.06.004 · DOI
  25. Louis, 2015, Environmental impacts and benefits of smart home automation: life cycle assessment of home energy management system, IFAC-Pap., 48, 880, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.05.158 · DOI
  26. Martiskainen, 2011, The role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in household energy consumption—prospects for the UK, Energy Effic., 2011, 209, 10.1007/s12053-010-9094-2 · DOI
  27. Marvin, 1999, Pathways of smart metering development: shaping environmental innovation, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 23, 109, 10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00011-3 · DOI
  28. Meadows, 2017, Smart meter roll-out: is getting one still compulsory?, Telegraph
  29. Murphy, 2016, Smart meters: a timeline of the UK rollout - energy customers are cynical about the rollout, Comput. World
  30. Murphy, 2016, Technological solutions to privacy questions: what is the role of law?, Inf. Commun. Technol. Law, 25, 4, 10.1080/13600834.2015.1134148 · DOI
  31. Orlowski, 2012, Smart meters won't be compulsory, Register
  32. Palmer, 2015, 1.5 million smart meters won't work when you switch energy supplier, Telegraph
  33. Poghosyan, 2015, Long term individual load forecast under different electrical vehicles uptake scenarios, Appl. Energy, 157, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.069 · DOI
  34. Pullinger, 2014, Influencing household energy practices: a critical review of UK smart metering standards and commercial feedback devices, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 26, 1144, 10.1080/09537325.2014.977245 · DOI
  35. Robinson, 2013, Analysis of electric vehicle driver recharging demand profiles and subsequent impacts on the carbon content of electric vehicle trips, Energy Policy, 61, 337, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.074 · DOI
  36. Rose, 2014, Unveiled: new £200 'smart' meters every household must pay for (but may not work), Mail Sunday
  37. Savirimuthu, 2013, Smart meters and the information panopticon: beyond the rhetoric of compliance, Int. Rev. Law, Comput. Technol., 27, 161, 10.1080/13600869.2013.764140 · DOI
  38. Shannon, 2015, Just how smart are these energy meters?, Financ. Mail Sunday
  39. Skjølsvold, 2015, Ambivalence, designing users and user imaginaries in the European smart grid: insights from an interdisciplinary demonstration project, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 9, 43, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.026 · DOI
  40. Smart Energy GB. 2016. Citizens advice partners with Smart Energy GB to spread the word about smart meters. July 18, available at 〈https://www.smartenergygb.org/en/resources/press-centre/press-releases-folder/citizens-advice-partnership〉.
  41. Sorrell, 2007, Improving the evidence base for energy policy: the role of systematic reviews, Energy Policy, 35, 1858, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.06.008 · DOI
  42. Sovacool, 2016, How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 13, 202, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020 · DOI
  43. Staffell, 2017, Measuring the progress and impacts of decarbonising British electricity, Energy Policy, 102, 463, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.037 · DOI
  44. Strengers, Yolande, 2015, Negotiating everyday life: the role of energy and water consumption feedback, J. Consum. Cult., 11, 319, 10.1177/1469540511417994 · DOI
  45. Thomas, 2012, Not too smart an innovation: UK plans to switch consumers to smart gas and electricity meters, Energy Environ., 23, 1057, 10.1260/0958-305X.23.6-7.1057 · DOI
  46. Vallés, 2016, Regulatory and market barriers to the realization of demand response in electricity distribution networks: a European perspective, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 140, 689, 10.1016/j.epsr.2016.04.026 · DOI
  47. Vesnic-Alujevic, 2016, What smart grids tell about innovation narratives in the European Union: hopes, imaginaries and policy, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 12, 16, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.011 · DOI
  48. Viitanen, 2015, Creating Smart Neighborhoods: Insights from Two Low-Carbon Communities in Sheffield and Leeds, United Kingdom, J. Urban Technology, 22, 19, 10.1080/10630732.2014.971537 · DOI
  49. Zhang, 2011, Evaluating government's policies on promoting smart metering diffusion in retail electricity markets via agent-based simulation, J. Product. Innov. Manag., 28, 169, 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00790.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Sovacool, B. K., Kivimaa, P., Hielscher, S., & Jenkins, K.
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
109
Pages
767-781
ISSN
0301-4215
DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.037
Cited by
171
References
0
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2018-02-01)
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • Research Councils United Kingdom (RCUK) Energy Program
  • “Center on Innovation and Energy Demand” (EP/K011790/1)
  • European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (730403)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review