The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The politics of technology bans: Industrial policy competition and green goals for the auto industry
Open accessAbstract
After decades of failure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the transport sector, several jurisdictions have in rapid succession announced future goals to phase out sales of internal combustion engine vehicles. This article argues that these announcements are predominantly a form of political signaling in a green industrial policy competition for alternative transport technologies, notably electric vehicles. We show that such signaling games in green industrial policy are likely to emerge when market growth for alternative technologies initiates industrial policy competition, which explains the clustered timing of political signals. A country’s position in the global auto industry, however, shapes the domestic political economy for announcing a phaseout goal. Countries with aspirations to develop export-oriented EV industries seek industrial upgrading; countries with existing export-oriented auto industries promote industrial renewal to maintain international competitiveness; and importing countries pursue phaseout goals primarily for environmental reasons. Our findings suggest that industrial upgraders can induce incumbent producer countries to participate in green industrial policy competition, leading to the “trading up” of energy technology policy goals. This contrasts with classic patterns of environmental policy competition, in which advanced industrialized nations are the pacesetters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-3359 · Cited by 2,297
Pipkin, S., & Fuentes, A. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.009 · Cited by 193
Cited by
A General Method to Probe Oxygen Evolution Intermediates at Operating Conditions
Tao, H. B., Xu, Y., Huang, X., Chen, J., Pei, L., Zhang, J., Chen, J. G., & Liu, B. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.03.012 · Cited by 587
Low‐carbon transition risks for finance
Semieniuk, G., Campiglio, E., Mercure, J., Volz, U., & Edwards, N. R. (2021) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.678 · Cited by 441
The geopolitics of energy system transformation: A review
Blondeel, M., Bradshaw, M. J., Bridge, G., & Kuzemko, C. (2021) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12580 · Cited by 341
Dahlgren, S. (2022) · Biofuels · doi:10.1080/17597269.2020.1821571 · Cited by 81
Zhou, S., Qiu, Y., Zou, F., He, D., Yu, P., Du, J., Luo, X., Wang, C., Wu, Z., & Gu, W. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2958403 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Meckling, J., & Nahm, J.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 126
- Pages
- 470-479
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2905299493
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The politics of technology bans: Industrial policy competition and green goals for the auto industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.031
- The paper
- Meckling, J., & Nahm, J. (2019). The politics of technology bans: Industrial policy competition and green goals for the auto industry. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.