The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The political economy of coal in Poland: Drivers and barriers for a shift away from fossil fuels
Open accessAbstract
Poland is the largest hard coal and second largest lignite producer in the EU, generating around 80 percent of its electricity from coal. Resistance to a reduction in coal production and consumption comes from various actors, namely, coal corporations, unions, parts of civil society and the government – as well as their coalitions. Their opposition centres around the prospect of losing their business, past negative experiences with structural change, fears of rising energy prices and energy security concerns, as well as potential unemployment in regions almost entirely dependent on coal. This paper identifies key political and economic drivers and barriers of a reduction in coal production and consumption in Poland using the Triple Embeddedness Framework. Uneconomic coal mining, unavoidable energy infrastructure investments, rising air pollution levels and pressure from the European Union might provide new political momentum for a shift away from coal in line with international climate targets. However, results show that to achieve political feasibility, policies targeting a reduction in coal production and use need to be implemented jointly with social and structural policy measures, addressing a just transition for the affected regions in line with the vision of a ‘European Green Deal’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 · Cited by 3,763
Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537329808524310 · Cited by 2,860
Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 · Cited by 2,269
The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C
McGlade, C., & Ekins, P. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14016 · Cited by 1,793
LOORBACH, D. (2010) · Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x · Cited by 1,748
Smith, A., Voß, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023 · Cited by 1,691
Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues
Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00138-x · Cited by 1,288
The political economy of the ‘just transition’
Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.1111/geoj.12008 · Cited by 1,285
A roadmap for rapid decarbonization
Rockström, J., Gaffney, O., Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah3443 · Cited by 1,225
Metadata
- Authors
- Brauers, H., & Oei, P.-Y.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 144
- Pages
- 111621
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3045820270
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 51.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The political economy of coal in Poland: Drivers and barriers for a shift away from fossil fuels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111621
- The paper
- Brauers, H., & Oei, P.-Y. (2020). The political economy of coal in Poland: Drivers and barriers for a shift away from fossil fuels. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.