CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73Energy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthClimate Change Policy and Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How large is the economy-wide rebound effect?

Open access
Stern, David I.·2020·Energy Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111870
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111870

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Adetutu, 2016, Economy-wide estimates of rebound effects: evidence from panel data, Energy J., 37, 251, 10.5547/01956574.37.3.made · DOI
  2. Ang, 2006, Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: from energy–GDP ratio to composite efficiency index, Energy Pol., 34, 574, 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.011 · DOI
  3. Barker, 2007, The macro-economic rebound effect and the UK economy, Energy Pol., 35, 4935, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.009 · DOI
  4. Barker, 2009, The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy, Energy Efficiency, 2, 411, 10.1007/s12053-009-9053-y · DOI · Paper page
  5. Borenstein, 2015, A microeconomic framework for evaluating energy efficiency rebound and some implications, Energy J., 36, 1, 10.5547/01956574.36.1.1 · DOI
  6. Broberg, 2015, The economy-wide rebound effect from improved energy efficiency in Swedish industries–A general equilibrium analysis, Energy Pol., 83, 26, 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.026 · DOI
  7. Bruns, 2019, Estimating the economy-wide rebound effect using empirically identified structural vector autoregressions, LEM Working Paper Series, 2019/27
  8. Chitnis, 2015, Living up to expectations: estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households, Energy Econ., 52, S100, 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.026 · DOI
  9. Csereklyei, 2016, Energy and economic growth: the stylized facts, Energy J., 37, 223, 10.5547/01956574.37.2.zcse · DOI
  10. Galvin, 2014, Estimating broad-brush rebound effects for household energy consumption in the EU28 countries and Norway: some policy implications of Odyssee data, Energy Pol., 73, 323, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.033 · DOI
  11. Gillingham, 2013, The rebound effect is overplayed, Nature, 493, 475, 10.1038/493475a · DOI
  12. Gillingham, 2016, The rebound effect and energy efficiency policy, Rev. Environ. Econ. Pol., 10, 68, 10.1093/reep/rev017 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hart, 2018, Rebound, directed technological change, and aggregate demand for energy, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 89, 1
  14. Koesler, 2015, Substitution elasticities in a constant elasticity of substitution framework–empirical estimates using nonlinear least squares, Econ. Syst. Res., 27, 101, 10.1080/09535314.2014.926266 · DOI
  15. Koesler, 2016, International spillover and rebound effects from increased energy efficiency in Germany, Energy Econ., 54, 444, 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.12.011 · DOI
  16. Koetse, 2008, Capital-energy substitution and shifts in factor demand: a meta-analysis, Energy Econ., 30, 2236, 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.06.006 · DOI
  17. Lemoine, 2020, General equilibrium rebound from energy efficiency innovation, Eur. Econ. Rev., 125, 103431, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103431 · DOI
  18. León-Ledesma, 2010, Identifying the elasticity of substitution with biased technical change, American Economic Review, 100, 1330, 10.1257/aer.100.4.1330 · DOI
  19. Lin, 2015, Measuring energy rebound effect in the Chinese economy: an economic accounting approach, Energy Econ., 50, 96, 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.014 · DOI
  20. Lu, 2017, Rebound effect of improved energy efficiency for different energy types: a general equilibrium analysis for China, Energy Econ., 62, 248, 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.010 · DOI
  21. Ma, 2016, Long-run estimates of interfuel and interfactor elasticities, Resour. Energy Econ., 46, 114, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.09.003 · DOI
  22. Matteson, 2017, Independent component analysis via distance covariance, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 112, 623, 10.1080/01621459.2016.1150851 · DOI
  23. Milgrom, 1996, The LeChatelier principle, Am. Econ. Rev., 86, 173
  24. Orea, 2015, A new approach to measuring the rebound effect associated to energy efficiency improvements: an application to the US residential energy demand, Energy Econ., 49, 599, 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.016 · DOI
  25. Rausch, 2018, Does higher energy efficiency lower economy-wide energy use?, Center of Economic Research at ETH Zurich Economics Working Paper 18/299
  26. Saunders, 2008, Fuel conserving (and using) production functions, Energy Econ., 30, 2184, 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.11.006 · DOI
  27. Saunders, 2013, Historical evidence for energy efficiency rebound in 30 US sectors and a toolkit for rebound analysts, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 80, 1317, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.007 · DOI
  28. Saunders, 2015, Recent evidence for large rebound: elucidating the drivers and their implications for climate change models, Energy J., 36, 23, 10.5547/01956574.36.1.2 · DOI
  29. Saunders, 2012, Rebound effects for lighting, Energy Pol., 49, 477, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.050 · DOI
  30. Shao, 2014, Using latent variable approach to estimate China's economy-wide energy rebound effect over 1954–2010, Energy Pol., 72, 235, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.041 · DOI
  31. Solow, 1956, A contribution to the theory of economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65, 10.2307/1884513 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Sorrell, 2009, Jevons' Paradox revisited: the evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency, Energy Pol., 37, 1456, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Stern, 2017, How accurate are energy intensity projections?, Climatic Change, 143, 537, 10.1007/s10584-017-2003-3 · DOI
  34. Tsao, 2010, Solid-state lighting: an energy-economics perspective, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 43, 1, 10.1088/0022-3727/43/35/354001 · DOI
  35. Turner, 2009, Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy, Energy Econ., 31, 648, 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.01.008 · DOI
  36. Turner, 2013, “Rebound” effects from increased energy efficiency: a time to pause and reflect, Energy J., 34, 25, 10.5547/01956574.34.4.2 · DOI
  37. Turner, 2011, Energy efficiency, rebound effects and the environmental Kuznets Curve, Energy Econ., 33, 709, 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.12.002 · DOI
  38. van Benthem, 2015, Energy leapfrogging, J. Assoc. Environ. Resou. Econ., 2, 93
  39. Wei, 2017, Estimation of global re-bound effect caused by energy efficiency improvement, Energy Econ., 66, 27, 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.030 · DOI
  40. Zhang, 2017, The macroeconomic rebound effect in China, Energy Economics, 67, 202, 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.020 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stern, D. I.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Stern, David I.
ORCID
Stern, David I.
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
147
Pages
111870
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111870
OpenAlex
W3048632000
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Energy Policy (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
rebound effect, energy efficiency, greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, Jevons paradox, general equilibrium simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review