Cited by 801Energy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthClimate Change Policy and Economics

Jevons’ Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency

Open access
Sorrell, Steve·2009·Energy Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.003

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Economy-wide rebound effects can be particularly large for general-purpose technologies such as electricity, the steam engine, and the Internet because they can have global spillover effects on industries and labor markets.

    “These types of rebound effects can be particularly large for so-called 'general-purpose technologies' such as electricity, the steam engine and the Internet, since these can have global spillover effects on industries and labor markets [111, 112].”
  • Greater efficiency may increase the production of goods and thus GHG emissions via rebound effects unless industrial actors have sufficient incentives to reduce overall emissions.

    “However, it is worth noting that greater efficiency may increase the production of goods and thus GHG emissions (via rebound effects) unless industrial actors have sufficient incentives to reduce overall emissions [748].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [748]

  • Aggregate demand continues to rise, confirming the persistence of rebound effects.

    “However, aggregate demand continues to rise, confirming the persistence of rebound effects (Sorrell 2009).”
  • A recurring pattern across the reviewed literature is the contradiction between technological efficiency and aggregate environmental load, often captured by the Jevons paradox.

    “A recurring pattern across the reviewed literature is the contradiction between technological efficiency and aggregate environmental load, a dynamic often captured by the Jevons paradox (Sorrell 2009).”
  • This rebound effect illustrates why efficiency-enabling growth remains inadequate when sustainability strategies focus solely on technological optimization.

    “This rebound effect, which illustrates why efficiency-enabling growth remains inadequate when sustainability strategies focus solely on technological optimization (Sorrell 2009), is a key example.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sorrell, S.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Sorrell, Steve
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
1456-1469
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987671618
Cited by
801
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 126 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 30
FWCI
11.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/G007748/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
Jevons paradox, rebound effect, energy efficiency, energy consumption, biophysical economics, ecological economics, economic growth, productivity, energy and economic growth, climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review