CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Cooperative is an oxymoron!”: A polycentric energy transition perspective on distributed energy deployment in the Upper Midwestern United States

Grimley, Matthew, Chan, Gabriel·2023·Energy Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113328
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113328

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Aligica, 2012, Polycentricity: from polanyi to Ostrom, and beyond, Governance, 25, 237, 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01550.x · DOI
  2. Anderies, 2013, Robustness of social-ecological systems: implications for public policy, Pol. Stud. J., 41, 513, 10.1111/psj.12027 · DOI
  3. Anderies, 2004, A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective, Ecol. Soc., 9, 10.5751/ES-00610-090118 · DOI
  4. Andersson, 2008, Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective, Pol. Sci., 41, 71, 10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Averch, 1962, Behavior of the firm under regulatory constraint, Am. Econ. Rev., 52, 1052
  6. Blomkvist, 2013, An analytical framework for common-pool resource–large technical system (CPR-LTS) constellations, Int. J. Commons, 7, 113, 10.18352/ijc.353 · DOI
  7. Courville, 1974, Regulation and efficiency in the electric utility industry, Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci., 5, 53, 10.2307/3003092 · DOI
  8. Cox, 2010, A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management, Ecol. Soc., 15, 10.5751/ES-03704-150438 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cumming, 2020, Advancing understanding of natural resource governance: a post-Ostrom research agenda, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 44, 26, 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.02.005 · DOI
  10. Gardner, 1990, The nature of common-pool resource problems. Ration, Soc, 2, 335
  11. Garud, 2013, Perspectives on innovation processes, Acad. Manag. Ann., 7, 10.5465/19416520.2013.791066 · DOI
  12. Geels, 2018, Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: a sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates, Energy Res. Social Sci., 40, 23, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.003 · DOI
  13. Gliedt, 2018, Innovation intermediaries accelerating environmental sustainability transitions, J. Clean. Prod., 174, 1247, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.054 · DOI
  14. Goldthau, 2014, Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: scale, decentralization and polycentrism, Energy Res. Social Sci., 1, 134, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.009 · DOI
  15. Gollwitzer, 2018, Rethinking the sustainability and institutional governance of electricity access and mini-grids: electricity as a common pool resource, Energy Res. Social Sci., 39, 152, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.033 · DOI
  16. Gustafson, 1981, Diversified utilization” can play a strong hand in dealing with the energy Crisis, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. PAS-, 100, 4661, 10.1109/TPAS.1981.316808 · DOI
  17. Kivimaa, 2019, Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: a systematic review and a research agenda, Res. Policy, New Frontiers in Science, Technology and Innovation Research from SPRU’s 50th Anniversary Conference, 48, 1062
  18. Klass, 2021, Cooperative clean energy, N. C. Law Rev., 100
  19. Klooster, 2000, Institutional choice, community, and struggle: a case study of forest Co-management in Mexico, World Dev., 28, 1, 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00108-4 · DOI
  20. Köhler, 2019, An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lenhart, 2020, Municipal utilities and electric cooperatives in the United States: interpretive frames, strategic actions, and place-specific transitions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 36, 17, 10.1016/j.eist.2020.04.006 · DOI
  22. Levy, 2008, Case studies: types, designs, and logics of inference, Conflict Manag. Peace Sci., 25, 1, 10.1080/07388940701860318 · DOI
  23. Lindblom, 1959, The science of “muddling through, Publ. Adm. Rev., 19, 79, 10.2307/973677 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lubell, 2021, Institutional navigation for polycentric sustainability governance, Nat. Sustain., 1–8
  25. Markard, 2018, The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy, Nat. Energy, 3, 628, 10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7 · DOI
  26. Melville, 2017, The electric commons: a qualitative study of community accountability, Energy Pol., 106, 12, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.035 · DOI
  27. Morgan, 2017, New uses for an old tool: using cost of service studies to design rates in today’s electric utility service world, EQ Research
  28. Morgan, 1979, Electric power load management: some technical, economic, regulatory and social issues, Proc. IEEE, 67, 241, 10.1109/PROC.1979.11234 · DOI
  29. Morrison, 2019, The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance, Global Environ. Change, 57, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101934 · DOI
  30. Musiolik, 2011, Creating and shaping innovation systems: formal networks in the innovation system for stationary fuel cells in Germany, Energy Pol., 39, 1909, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.052 · DOI
  31. Musiolik, 2018, Creating innovation systems: how resource constellations affect the strategies of system builders, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
  32. Nelson, 1981, Minnkota’s program of load management: seven years in review, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. PAS-, 100, 1553, 10.1109/TPAS.1981.316542 · DOI
  33. Ostrom, 2010, Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems, Am. Econ. Rev., 100, 641, 10.1257/aer.100.3.641 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Pentland, 1999, Building process theory with narrative: from description to explanation, Acad. Manag. Rev., 24, 711, 10.2307/259350 · DOI
  35. Perez-Arriaga, 2016, The transmission of the future: the impact of distributed energy resources on the network, IEEE Power Energy Mag., 14, 41, 10.1109/MPE.2016.2550398 · DOI
  36. Pless, 2017, Bribes, bureaucracies, and blackouts: towards understanding how corruption at the firm level impacts electricity reliability, Resour. Energy Econ., 47, 36, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.11.001 · DOI
  37. Schot, 2018, Deep transitions: emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality, Res. Pol., 47, 1045, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.009 · DOI
  38. Shah, 1984, Load management experience of rural electric cooperatives, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. IA-, 20, 443, 10.1109/TIA.1984.4504433 · DOI
  39. Skjølsvold, 2018, Orchestrating households as collectives of participation in the distributed energy transition: new empirical and conceptual insights, Energy Res. Social Sci., 46, 252, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.035 · DOI
  40. Sovacool, 2020, Hot transformations: governing rapid and deep household heating transitions in China, Denmark, Finland and the United Kingdom, Energy Pol., 139, 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111330 · DOI
  41. Stokes, 2018, Politics in the U.S. energy transition: case studies of solar, wind, biofuels and electric vehicles policy, Energy Pol., 113, 76, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.057 · DOI
  42. Taylor, 2015, Learning from the Co-operative institutional model: how to enhance organizational robustness of third sector organizations with more pluralistic forms of governance, Adm. Sci., 5, 148, 10.3390/admsci5030148 · DOI
  43. Tortia, 2018, The firm as a common. Non-divided ownership, patrimonial stability and longevity of Co-operative enterprises, Sustainability, 10, 1023, 10.3390/su10041023 · DOI
  44. Tortia, 2021, Capital as common-pool resource: horizon problem, financial sustainability and reserves in worker cooperatives, J. Co-op. Organ. Manag., 9
  45. Wolsink, 2020, Distributed energy systems as common goods: socio-political acceptance of renewables in intelligent microgrids, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 127, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109841 · DOI
  46. Yakubovich, 2005, Electric Charges: the social construction of rate systems, Theory and Society. Theory Soc, 579, 10.1007/s11186-005-4198-y · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Grimley, M., & Chan, G.
ORCID
Chan, Gabriel
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
172
Pages
113328
ISSN
0301-4215
DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113328
Cited by
15
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review