Cited by 4,529Water Governance and InfrastructurePublic Policy and Administration ResearchEconomic Theory and Institutions

Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems

Open access
Ostrom, Elinor·2010·American Economic Review

Abstract

This excerpt describes the intellectual journey that I have taken the last half-century from when I began graduate studies in the late 1950s. The early efforts to understand the polycentric water industry in California were formative for me. In addition to working with Vincent Ostrom and Charles Tiebout as they formulated the concept of polycentric systems for governing metropolitan areas, I studied the efforts of a large group of private and public water producers facing the problem of an overdrafted groundwater basin on the coast and watching saltwater intrusion threaten the possibility of long-term use. Then, in the 1970s, I participated with colleagues in the study of polycentric police industries serving U.S. metropolitan areas to find that the dominant theory underlying massive reform proposals was incorrect. Metropolitan areas served by a combination of large and small producers could achieve economies of scale in the production of some police services and avoid diseconomies of scale in the production of others.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.100.3.641

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ostrom shared the 2009 Nobel in economics for showing that groups of people are capable of managing their common resources on their own, but only when certain conditions are met.

    “Ostrom shared the 2009 Nobel in economics for showing that groups of people are capable of managing their common resources on their own, but only when certain conditions are met.”

    From Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change (2014) · cites this paper as Ostrom 2010

  • Homologation enables indigenous territories to fulfill three CPR management requisites: clearly defined boundaries, collective management, and recognition of rights to organize.

    “Thus, homologation enables indigenous territories to fulfill three of the CPR management requisites: “clearly defined boundaries,” “collective management,” and “recognition of rights to organize” (11–13, 30).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ostrom, E.
Affiliations
Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408; Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2010-06-01
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
641-672
ISSN
  • 1918-6444 (ISSN-L)
  • 0002-8282
OpenAlex
W1968869144
Cited by
4,529
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 611 · 2025: 406 · 2024: 340 · 2023: 343 · 2022: 327 · 2021: 339 · 2020: 333 · 2019: 359 · 2018: 323 · 2017: 236 · 2016: 198 · 2015: 202 · 2014: 201 · 2013: 139 · 2012: 95
FWCI
603.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Transnational Corporation Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
Keywords
polycentric governance, complex economic systems, groundwater overexploitation, saltwater intrusion, urban water supply, police services, economies of scale, diseconomies of scale, Vincent Ostrom, metropolitan governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review