The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent progress and perspectives on aqueous Zn-based rechargeable batteries with mild aqueous electrolytes
Abstract
Abstract Aqueous rechargeable batteries are regarded as one of the ultimate solutions needed to solve the safety problems of conventional rechargeable batteries using organic electrolytes, but the challenge is to find suitable anode materials that will work well in the narrow electrochemical window of water with reasonable capacities. Aqueous Zn-based rechargeable batteries using Zn anode, a mild aqueous electrolyte, and Zn2+ or another monovalent/multivalent metal ion as charge carrier have been receiving extensive attention in recent years due to their low cost, high safety, environmental friendliness, and acceptable energy density. Although it is still a challenge to achieve high performance aqueous Zn-based rechargeable batteries with a long cycle life and a high energy density, considerable efforts have been devoted to overcoming the drawbacks associated with the Zn anode, electrolyte, and cathode materials. In this review, the recent advances on the aqueous Zn-based rechargeable batteries, including aqueous Zn ion batteries (AZIBs) and aqueous Zn hybrid batteries (AZHBs), are systematically reviewed. We first summarize and discuss the Zn anode behaviour and strategies to restrain the dendrite formation and improve the plating/stripping efficiency. Then, the cathode materials used in AZIBs and AZHBs are summarized in terms of their structures, electrochemical performance, and reaction mechanism, as well as the strategies used to improve their electrochemical performance. The electrolytes and their effects on the electrochemical performance of Zn anode and cathode materials are also discussed. Finally, the challenges for and perspectives on AZIBs and AZHBs are summarized to guide research directions in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Cited by
Boosting Zinc Electrode Reversibility in Aqueous Electrolytes by Using Low‐Cost Antisolvents
Hao, J., Yuan, L., Ye, C., Chao, D., Davey, K., Guo, Z., & Qiao, S. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202016531 · Cited by 935
Self-citationLi, M., Li, Z., Wang, X., Meng, J., Liu, X., Wu, B., Han, C., & Mai, L. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00030f · Cited by 559
Zeng, X., Xie, K., Liu, S., Zhang, S., Hao, J., Liu, J., Pang, W. K., Liu, J., Rao, P., Wang, Q., et al. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee01851e · Cited by 528
Self-citationMesoporous hollow carbon spheres boosted, integrated high performance aqueous Zn-Ion energy storage
Liu, P., Liu, W., Huang, Y., Li, P., Yan, J., & Liu, K. (2020) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.004 · Cited by 455
Issues and solutions toward zinc anode in aqueous zinc‐ion batteries: A mini review
Xie, C., Li, Y., Wang, Q., Sun, D., Tang, Y., & Wang, H. (2020) · Carbon Energy · doi:10.1002/cey2.67 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeng, X., Hao, J., Wang, Z., Mao, J., & Guo, Z.
- Venue
- Energy Storage Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 410-437
- ISSN
- 2405-8289 (ISSN-L)
- 2405-8297
- OpenAlex
- W2941168559
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent progress and perspectives on aqueous Zn-based rechargeable batteries with mild aqueous electrolytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.04.022
- The paper
- Zeng, X., Hao, J., Wang, Z., Mao, J., & Guo, Z. (2019). Recent progress and perspectives on aqueous Zn-based rechargeable batteries with mild aqueous electrolytes. Energy Storage Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.04.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.