The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding and suppression strategies toward stable Li metal anode for safe lithium batteries
Abstract
Abstract Recently, the technology of lithium metal-based batteries has devoted substantial importance with suggesting the great potential for power sources that could promise the revolution of electric vehicle (EV) and power grid. It is expected to overcome the challenges and barriers experienced during the use of these high energy density batteries in the desired large-scale applications such as hybrid electric vehicle (HEV), plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) and pure electric vehicle (PEV). Apart from the high energy density and enormous applications of Li-ion batteries, still there are some issues affecting the rate capability, performance, safety and cost due to dendritic growth during cycling of lithium batteries. Therefore, it is generous worthy to provide existing and timely apprises of constantly improving techniques to diminish the dendrites formation, especially for the metallic Li anode, because dendritic growth is the main problem that inhibits the commercial applications of lithium metal batteries in regular portable electronics to EV. In this review, we concisely summarize the fundamentals, existing issues, solid electrolyte interphases (SEI) on lithium metal anode, insight understanding and growth of dendritic structure and morphologies. Moreover, different prevention techniques for dendrites suppression, and some significant remarks are provided for future research and development of advanced dendrite free Li metal batteries for safe and potential use in the electric vehicles and also in high load-leveling applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
A solid future for battery development
Janek, J., & Zeier, W. G. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.141 · Cited by 3,979
Orsini, F., Du Pasquier, A., Beaudoin, B., Tarascon, J. M., Trentin, M., Langenhuizen, N., De Beer, E., & Notten, P. (1998) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(98)00128-1 · Cited by 310
Cited by
Yusuf, V. F., Malek, N. I., & Kailasa, S. K. (2022) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c05310 · Cited by 894
Zheng, J., Kim, M. S., Tu, Z., Choudhury, S., Tang, T., & Archer, L. A. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00883g · Cited by 466
Strategies to anode protection in lithium metal battery: A review
Li, J., Kong, Z., Liu, X., Zheng, B., Fan, Q. H., Garratt, E., Schuelke, T., Wang, K., Xu, H., & Jin, H. (2021) · InfoMat · doi:10.1002/inf2.12189 · Cited by 267
Safer Lithium‐Ion Batteries from the Separator Aspect: Development and Future Perspectives
Liu, Z., Jiang, Y., Hu, Q., Guo, S., Yu, L., Li, Q., Liu, Q., & Hu, X. (2021) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12129 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Yasin, G., Arif, M., Mehtab, T., Lu, X., Yu, D., Muhammad, N., Nazir, M. T., & Song, H.
- Venue
- Energy Storage Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 25
- Pages
- 644-678
- ISSN
- 2405-8289 (ISSN-L)
- 2405-8297
- OpenAlex
- W2974623815
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding and suppression strategies toward stable Li metal anode for safe lithium batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.020
- The paper
- Yasin, G., Arif, M., Mehtab, T., Lu, X., Yu, D., Muhammad, N., Nazir, M. T., & Song, H. (2020). Understanding and suppression strategies toward stable Li metal anode for safe lithium batteries. Energy Storage Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.