The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent advances in electrolytes and cathode materials for magnesium and hybrid-ion batteries
Abstract
Abstract The rechargeable magnesium ion batteries (MIBs) are ideal candidates to replace currently commercialized high energy density lithium ion batteries (LIBs) owing to their cost effective and environmentally friendly nature. However, bad performance of MIBs is a big challenge for researchers. In this review, we have critically discussed the state-of-the-art research activities made for the development of Mg-ion battery electrolytes and cathode materials with fast magnesiation kinetics. Emphasizing the chemical structures of both organic and inorganic electrolytes and their compatibilities with different cathode materials, the kinetic properties of electrochemical reactions for achieving optimized energy and power densities, are critically reviewed. To tackle the large polarizations of MIBs, the latest and emerging hybrid ion electrochemistries such as Mg–Li, Mg–Na, aqueous rechargeable Mg–Na, and Mg–Zn hybrid ion batteries, are highlighted to elaborate the merits and challenges of each electrolyte and nanostructured cathodes. The cathode materials covered in this review include various kinds of inorganic materials (i.e. metal oxides, metal sulfides), organic polymers, Prussian blue analogous and NASICON-type Li/Na cathodes with high working potentials. At the end, this review discuss comprehensive future research strategies for exploring new cathodes with high working voltages for MIBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries
Vaalma, C., Buchholz, D., Weil, M., & Passerini, S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2018.13 · Cited by 2,613
Ramanujapuram, A., & Yushin, G. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201802624 · Cited by 130
Cited by
Electrochemical energy storage devices working in extreme conditions
Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Xing, G., Chou, S.-L., & Tang, Y. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00271f · Cited by 346
Electrolytes in Organic Batteries
Li, M., Hicks, R. P., Chen, Z., Luo, C., Guo, J., Wang, C., & Xu, Y. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00374 · Cited by 303
Recent progress of Prussian blue analogues as cathode materials for nonaqueous sodium-ion batteries
Xie, B., Sun, B., Gao, T., Ma, Y., Yin, G., & Zuo, P. (2022) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214478 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Rashad, M., Asif, M., Wang, Y., He, Z., & Ahmed, I.
- Venue
- Energy Storage Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 25
- Pages
- 342-375
- ISSN
- 2405-8289 (ISSN-L)
- 2405-8297
- OpenAlex
- W2979559092
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances in electrolytes and cathode materials for magnesium and hybrid-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.10.004
- The paper
- Rashad, M., Asif, M., Wang, Y., He, Z., & Ahmed, I. (2020). Recent advances in electrolytes and cathode materials for magnesium and hybrid-ion batteries. Energy Storage Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.10.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
