Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 736

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phytoremediation: Mechanisms, plant selection and enhancement by natural and synthetic agents

Open access
Kafle, Arjun, Timilsina, Anil, Gautam, Asmita, Adhikari, Kaushik, Bhattarai, Anukul, Aryal, Niroj·2022·Environmental Advances

Abstract

With current intensive agriculture practices and industrialization, pollution of natural resources like land and water with heavy metals, organic pollutants, radionuclides, pesticides, and fertilizers has become a major concern. Phytoremediation is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly technique that utilizes plants to immobilize, uptake, reduce toxicity, stabilize, or degrade the compounds that are released into the environment from different sources. Studies have shown that heavy metals, organic contaminants, radionuclides, antibiotics, and pesticides can be remediated using plants. Though phytoremediation has been practiced since decades, it is still an emerging technology. This review article summarizes existing information and synthesizes the recent findings on plant species suitable for use in phytoremediation through utilizing different mechanisms, aids that can enhance the efficiency of phytoremediation processes, and strengths and limitations that comes with the application of this technique. Diverse plants remediate different pollutants at different rates through one or multiple mechanisms. The limitations of phytoremediation can be overcome by using several aids including natural and chemical amendments, genetic engineering and natural microbial stimulation. Given the low-cost of phytoremediation compared to conventional technology and sustainability associated with plants and use of renewable energy, phytoremediation can be a reliable solution for a sustainable and economical remediation of soil and water from the organic and inorganic pollutants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100203

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 736

Metadata

Authors
Kafle, A., Timilsina, A., Gautam, A., Adhikari, K., Bhattarai, A., & Aryal, N.
Venue
Environmental Advances
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
8
Pages
100203
ISSN
2666-7657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214487695
Cited by
736
References
7
FWCI
28.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytoremediation: Mechanisms, plant selection and enhancement by natural and synthetic agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100203
The paper
Kafle, A., Timilsina, A., Gautam, A., Adhikari, K., Bhattarai, A., & Aryal, N. (2022). Phytoremediation: Mechanisms, plant selection and enhancement by natural and synthetic agents. Environmental Advances. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100203

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.