The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mixotrophic cyanobacteria and microalgae as distinctive biological agents for organic pollutant degradation
Open accessAbstract
Millions of natural and synthetic organic chemical substances are present in both soil and aquatic environments. Toxicity and/or persistence determine the polluting principle of these substances. The biological responses to these pollutants include accumulation and degradation. The responses of environments with organic pollutants are perceptible from the dwindling degradative abilities of microorganisms. Among different biological members, cyanobacteria and microalgae are highly adaptive through many eons, and can grow autotrophically, heterotrophically or mixotrophically. Mixotrophy in cyanobacteria and microalgae can provide many competitive advantages over bacteria and fungi in degrading organic pollutants. Laboratory culturing of strict phototrophic algae has limited the realization of their potential as bioremediation agents. In the natural assemblages, mixotrophic algae can contribute to sequestration of carbon, which is otherwise emitted as carbon dioxide to the atmosphere under heterotrophic conditions by other organisms. Molecular methods and metabolic and genomic information will help not only in identification and selection of mixotrophic species of cyanobacteria and microalgae with capabilities to degrade organic pollutants but also in monitoring the efficiency of remediation efforts under the field conditions. These organisms are relatively easier for genetic engineering with desirable traits. This review presents a new premise from the literature that mixotrophic algae and cyanobacteria are distinctive bioremediation agents with capabilities to sequester carbon in the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Algae-bacteria interactions: Evolution, ecology and emerging applications
Ramanan, R., Kim, B.-H., Cho, D.-H., Oh, H.-M., & Kim, H.-S. (2016) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.003 · Cited by 1,301
Fuentes, J., Garbayo, I., Cuaresma, M., Montero, Z., González-del-Valle, M., & Vílchez, C. (2016) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md14050100 · Cited by 462
Cyanobacteria as a source of biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture
Chittora, D., Meena, M., Barupal, T., Swapnil, P., & Sharma, K. (2020) · Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100737 · Cited by 312
Construction of microbial consortia for microbial degradation of complex compounds
Cao, Z., Yan, W., Ding, M., & Yuan, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.1051233 · Cited by 274
Al-Jabri, H., Das, P., Khan, S., Thaher, M., & AbdulQuadir, M. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w13010027 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Subashchandrabose, S. R., Ramakrishnan, B., Megharaj, M., Venkateswarlu, K., & Naidu, R.
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 59-72
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024740110
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixotrophic cyanobacteria and microalgae as distinctive biological agents for organic pollutant degradation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2012.10.007
- The paper
- Subashchandrabose, S. R., Ramakrishnan, B., Megharaj, M., Venkateswarlu, K., & Naidu, R. (2013). Mixotrophic cyanobacteria and microalgae as distinctive biological agents for organic pollutant degradation. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.10.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.