The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatiotemporal continuous estimates of PM2.5 concentrations in China, 2000–2016: A machine learning method with inputs from satellites, chemical transport model, and ground observations
Open accessAbstract
Ambient exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) is known to harm public health in China. Satellite remote sensing measurements of aerosol optical depth (AOD) were statistically associated with in-situ observations after 2013 to predict PM 2.5 concentrations nationwide, while the lack of surface monitoring data before 2013 have created difficulties in historical PM 2.5 exposure estimates. Hindcast approaches using statistical models or chemical transport models (CTMs) were developed to overcome this limitation, while those approaches still suffer from incomplete daily coverage due to missing AOD data or limited accuracy due to uncertainties of CTMs. Here we developed a new machine learning (ML) model with high-dimensional expansion (HD-expansion) of numerous predictors (including AOD and other satellite covariates, meteorological variables and CTM simulations). Through comprehensive characterization of the nonlinear effects of, and interactions among different predictors, the HD-expansion parameterized the association between PM 2.5 and AOD as a nonlinear function of space and time covariates (e.g., planetary boundary layer height and relative humidity). In this way, the PM 2.5 -AOD association can vary spatiotemporally. We trained the model with data from 2013 to 2016 and evaluated its performance using annually-iterated cross-validation, which iteratively held out the in-situ observations for a whole calendar year (as testing data) to examine the predictions from a model trained by the rest of the observations. Our estimates were found to be in good agreement with in-situ observations, with correlation coefficients ( R 2 ) of 0.61, 0.68, and 0.75 for daily, monthly and annual averages, respectively. To interpolate the missing predictions due to incomplete AOD data, we incorporated a generalized additive model into the ML model. The two-stage estimates of PM 2.5 sacrificed the prediction accuracy on a daily timescale ( R 2 = 0.55), but achieved complete spatiotemporal coverage and improved the accuracy of monthly ( R 2 = 0.71) and annual ( R 2 = 0.77) averages. The model was then used to predict daily PM 2.5 concentrations during 2000–2016 across China and estimate long-term trends in PM 2.5 for the period. We found that population-weighted concentrations of PM 2.5 significantly increased, by 2.10 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.74, 2.46) μg/m 3 /year during 2000–2007, and rapidly decreased by 4.51 (3.12, 5.90) μg/m 3 /year during 2013–2016. In this study, we produced AOD-based estimates of historical PM 2.5 with complete spatiotemporal coverage, which were evidenced as accurate, particularly in middle and long term. The products could support large-scale epidemiological studies and risk assessments of ambient PM 2.5 in China and can be accessed via the website ( http://www.meicmodel.org/dataset-phd.html ).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cohen, A. J., Brauer, M., Burnett, R., Anderson, H. R., Frostad, J., Estep, K., Balakrishnan, K., Brunekreef, B., Dandona, L., Dandona, R., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30505-6 · Cited by 6,583
Burnett, R. T., Pope, C. A., Ezzati, M., Olives, C., Lim, S. S., Mehta, S., Shin, H. H., Singh, G., Hubbell, B., Brauer, M., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1307049 · Cited by 1,901
Addressing Global Mortality from Ambient PM2.5
Apte, J. S., Marshall, J. D., Cohen, A. J., & Brauer, M. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01236 · Cited by 995
Cited by
Wei, J., Li, Z., Lyapustin, A., Sun, L., Peng, Y., Xue, W., Su, T., & Cribb, M. (2021) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.112136 · Cited by 1,346
Wei, J., Li, Z., Cribb, M., Huang, W., Xue, W., Sun, L., Guo, J., Peng, Y., Li, J., Lyapustin, A., et al. (2020) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-20-3273-2020 · Cited by 706
Drivers of PM2.5 air pollution deaths in China 2002–2017
Geng, G., Zheng, Y., Zhang, Q., Xue, T., Zhao, H., Tong, D., Zheng, B., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., et al. (2021) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-021-00792-3 · Cited by 477
Self-citationPathways of China's PM2.5 air quality 2015–2060 in the context of carbon neutrality
Cheng, J., Tong, D., Zhang, Q., Liu, Y., Lei, Y., Yan, G., Yan, L., Yu, S., Cui, R. Y., Clarke, L., et al. (2021) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwab078 · Cited by 420
Self-citationXue, T., Zheng, Y., Geng, G., Xiao, Q., Meng, X., Wang, M., Li, X., Wu, N., Zhang, Q., & Zhu, T. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c03098 · Cited by 285
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Xue, T., Zheng, Y., Tong, D., Zheng, B., Li, X., Zhu, T., & Zhang, Q.
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 123
- Pages
- 345-357
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904851601
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatiotemporal continuous estimates of PM2.5 concentrations in China, 2000–2016: A machine learning method with inputs from satellites, chemical transport model, and ground observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.075
- The paper
- Xue, T., Zheng, Y., Tong, D., Zheng, B., Li, X., Zhu, T., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Spatiotemporal continuous estimates of PM2.5 concentrations in China, 2000–2016: A machine learning method with inputs from satellites, chemical transport model, and ground observations. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.