The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved 1 km resolution PM 2.5 estimates across China using enhanced space–time extremely randomized trees
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Fine particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters ≤2.5 µm (PM2.5) has adverse effects on human health and the atmospheric environment. The estimation of surface PM2.5 concentrations has made intensive use of satellite-derived aerosol products. However, it has been a great challenge to obtain high-quality and high-resolution PM2.5 data from both ground and satellite observations, which is essential to monitor air pollution over small-scale areas such as metropolitan regions. Here, the space–time extremely randomized trees (STET) model was enhanced by integrating updated spatiotemporal information and additional auxiliary data to improve the spatial resolution and overall accuracy of PM2.5 estimates across China. To this end, the newly released Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction AOD product, along with meteorological, topographical and land-use data and pollution emissions, was input to the STET model, and daily 1 km PM2.5 maps for 2018 covering mainland China were produced. The STET model performed well, with a high out-of-sample (out-of-station) cross-validation coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.89 (0.88), a low root-mean-square error of 10.33 (10.93) µg m−3, a small mean absolute error of 6.69 (7.15) µg m−3 and a small mean relative error of 21.28 % (23.69 %). In particular, the model captured well the PM2.5 concentrations at both regional and individual site scales. The North China Plain, the Sichuan Basin and Xinjiang Province always featured high PM2.5 pollution levels, especially in winter. The STET model outperformed most models presented in previous related studies, with a strong predictive power (e.g., monthly R2=0.80), which can be used to estimate historical PM2.5 records. More importantly, this study provides a new approach for obtaining high-resolution and high-quality PM2.5 dataset across mainland China (i.e., ChinaHighPM2.5), important for air pollution studies focused on urban areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geurts, P., Ernst, D., & Wehenkel, L. (2006) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 · Cited by 9,300
High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China
Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K.-F., Cao, J.-J., Han, Y., Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13774 · Cited by 4,556
The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean
Levy, R. C., Mattoo, S., Munchak, L. A., Remer, L. A., Sayer, A. M., Patadia, F., & Hsu, N. C. (2013) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013 · Cited by 2,323
Sensitivity Analysis of k-Fold Cross Validation in Prediction Error Estimation
Rodriguez, J. D., Perez, A., & Lozano, J. A. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.187 · Cited by 1,890 · cited 2×
“, the out-of-sample cross-validation (CV) approach, is performed on all data samples using the 10-fold CV procedure (Rodriguez et al., 2010).”
Zheng, G. J., Duan, F. K., Su, H., Ma, Y. L., Cheng, Y., Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Huang, T., Kimoto, T., Chang, D., et al. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-2969-2015 · Cited by 951
Seinfeld, J. H., Bretherton, C., Carslaw, K. S., Coe, H., DeMott, P. J., Dunlea, E. J., Feingold, G., Ghan, S., Guenther, A. B., Kahn, R., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1514043113 · Cited by 940
MODIS Collection 6 MAIAC algorithm
Lyapustin, A., Wang, Y., Korkin, S., & Huang, D. (2018) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-11-5741-2018 · Cited by 934
Self-citationAerosol and boundary-layer interactions and impact on air quality
Li, Z., Guo, J., Ding, A., Liao, H., Liu, J., Sun, Y., Wang, T., Xue, H., Zhang, H., & Zhu, B. (2017) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwx117 · Cited by 903
Self-citationZhai, S., Jacob, D. J., Wang, X., Shen, L., Li, K., Zhang, Y., Gui, K., Zhao, T., & Liao, H. (2019) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-19-11031-2019 · Cited by 785
Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Li, J., Yang, T., & Yin, Y. (2014) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2014jd021641 · Cited by 715
Self-citation
Cited by
Wei, J., Liu, S., Li, Z., Liu, C., Qin, K., Liu, X., Pinker, R. T., Dickerson, R. R., Lin, J., Boersma, K. F., et al. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c03834 · Cited by 361
Self-citationShi, H., Zhang, J., Zhao, B., Xia, X., Hu, B., Chen, H., Wei, J., Liu, M., Bian, Y., Fu, D., et al. (2021) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl091105 · Cited by 44
Self-citationTan, J., Li, N., Wang, X., Chen, G., Yan, L., Wang, L., Zhao, Y., Li, S., & Guo, Y. (2021) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100147 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Wei, J., Li, Z., Cribb, M., Huang, W., Xue, W., Sun, L., Guo, J., Peng, Y., Li, J., Lyapustin, A., Liu, L., Wu, H., & Song, Y.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2020-03-19
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3273-3289
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2981441128
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 27.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved 1 km resolution PM 2.5 estimates across China using enhanced space–time extremely randomized trees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-20-3273-2020
- The paper
- Wei, J., Li, Z., Cribb, M., Huang, W., Xue, W., Sun, L., Guo, J., Peng, Y., Li, J., Lyapustin, A., Liu, L., Wu, H., & Song, Y. (2020). Improved 1 km resolution PM 2.5 estimates across China using enhanced space–time extremely randomized trees. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3273-2020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.