The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Beyond the obvious: Environmental health implications of polar polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Open accessAbstract
The genotoxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic effects of polar polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (polar PAHs) are believed to surpass those of their parent PAHs; however, their environmental and human health implications have been largely unexplored. Oxygenated PAHs (oxy-PAHs) is a critical class of polar PAHs associated with carcinogenic effects without enzymatic activation. They also cause an upsurge in reactive oxygen species (ROS) in living cells. This results in oxidative stress and other consequences, such as abnormal gene expressions, altered protein activities, mutagenesis, and carcinogenesis. Similarly, some nitrated PAHs (N-PAHs) are probable human carcinogens as classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Heterocyclic PAHs (polar PAHs containing nitrogen, sulphur and oxygen atoms within the aromatic rings) have been shown to be potent endocrine disruptors, primarily through their estrogenic activities. Despite the high toxicity and enhanced environmental mobility of many polar PAHs, they have attracted only a little attention in risk assessment of contaminated sites. This may lead to underestimation of potential risks, and remediation end points. In this review, the toxicity of polar PAHs and their associated mechanisms of action, including their role in mutagenic, carcinogenic, developmental and teratogenic effects are critically discussed. This review suggests that polar PAHs could have serious toxicological effects on human health and should be considered during risk assessment of PAH-contaminated sites. The implications of not doing so were argued and critical knowledge gaps and future research requirements discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mojiri, A., Zhou, J. L., Ohashi, A., Ozaki, N., & Kindaichi, T. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133971 · Cited by 656
Dijkhoff, I. M., Drasler, B., Karakocak, B. B., Petri-Fink, A., Valacchi, G., Eeman, M., & Rothen-Rutishauser, B. (2020) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-020-00366-y · Cited by 202
Laothamteep, N., Kawano, H., Vejarano, F., Suzuki-Minakuchi, C., Shintani, M., Nojiri, H., & Pinyakong, O. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116769 · Cited by 80
Ce(Ⅲ) activates peroxymonosulfate for the degradation of substituted PAHs
Chen, X., Wang, P., Peng, F., Zhou, Z., Waigi, M. G., & Ling, W. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135525 · Cited by 36
Air Pollution and Skin Diseases
Han, H. S., Seok, J., & Park, K. Y. (2025) · Annals of Dermatology · doi:10.5021/ad.24.159 · Cited by 28
“1 ) 3-5 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Idowu, O., Semple, K. T., Ramadass, K., O'Connor, W., Hansbro, P., & Thavamani, P.
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 123
- Pages
- 543-557
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2907423837
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond the obvious: Environmental health implications of polar polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.051
- The paper
- Idowu, O., Semple, K. T., Ramadass, K., O'Connor, W., Hansbro, P., & Thavamani, P. (2019). Beyond the obvious: Environmental health implications of polar polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.