Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing the human health risks of perfluorooctane sulfonate by in vivo and in vitro studies

Open access
Zeng, Zhuotong, Song, Biao, Xiao, Rong, Zeng, Guangming, Gong, Jilai, Chen, Ming, Xu, Piao, Zhang, Peng, Shen, Maocai, Yi, Huan·2019·Environment International

Abstract

The wide use of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) has led to increasing concern about its human health risks over the past decade. In vivo and in vitro studies are important and effective means to ascertain the toxic effects of PFOS on humans and its toxic mechanisms. This article systematically reviews the human health risks of PFOS based on the currently known facts found by in vivo and in vitro studies from 2008 to 2018. Exposure to PFOS has caused hepatotoxicity, neurotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, immunotoxicity, thyroid disruption, cardiovascular toxicity, pulmonary toxicity, and renal toxicity in laboratory animals and many in vitro human systems. These results and related epidemiological studies confirmed the human health risks of PFOS, especially for exposure via food and drinking water. Oxidative stress and physiological process disruption based on fatty acid similarity were widely studied mechanisms of PFOS toxicity. Future research for assessing the human health risks of PFOS is recommended in the chronic toxicity and molecular mechanisms, the application of various omics, and the integration of toxicological and epidemiological data. • Assessing human health risks of PFOS by in vivo and in vitro studies are reviewed. • Exposure to PFOS can cause significant human health risks. • The chronic toxicity and molecular mechanisms need further study. • Integration of the toxicological and epidemiological data is recommended.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.002

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 132 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Zeng, Z., Song, B., Xiao, R., Zeng, G., Gong, J., Chen, M., Xu, P., Zhang, P., Shen, M., & Yi, H.
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
126
Pages
598-610
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921969408
Cited by
299
References
132
FWCI
13.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the human health risks of perfluorooctane sulfonate by in vivo and in vitro studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.002
The paper
Zeng, Z., Song, B., Xiao, R., Zeng, G., Gong, J., Chen, M., Xu, P., Zhang, P., Shen, M., & Yi, H. (2019). Assessing the human health risks of perfluorooctane sulfonate by in vivo and in vitro studies. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.