The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development, current state and future trends of sludge management in China: Based on exploratory data and CO2-equivaient emissions analysis
Open accessAbstract
This study statistically reported the current state of sludge treatment/disposal in China from the aspects of sources, technical routes, geographical distribution, and development by using observational data after 1978. By the end of 2019, 5476 municipal wastewater treatment plants were operating in China, leading to an annual sludge productivity of 39.04 million tons (80% water content). Overall, 29.3% of the sludge in China was disposed via land application, followed by incineration (26.7%) and sanitary landfills (20.1%). Incineration, compost, thermal hydrolysis and anerobic digestion were the mainstream technologies for sludge treatment in China, with capacities of 27,122, 11,250, 8342 and 6944 t/d in 2019, respectively. Incineration and drying were preferentially constructed in East China. In contrast, sludge compost was most frequently used in Northeast China (46.5%), East China (22.4%) and Central China (12.8%), while anaerobic digestion in East China, North China and Central China. The capacities of sludge facilities exhibited a sharp increase in 2009–2019, with an overall greenhouse gas emissions in China in 2019 reached 108.18 × 108 kg CO2-equivaient emissions, and the four main technical routes contributed as: incineration (45.11%) > sanitary landfills (23.04%) > land utilization (17.64%) > building materials (14.21%). Challenges and existing problems of sludge disposal in China, including high CO2 emissions, unbalanced regional development, low stabilization and land utilization levels, were discussed. Finally, suggestions regarding potential technical and administrative measures in China, and sustainable sludge management for developing countries, were also given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Utilization of sewage sludge in EU application of old and new methods—A review
Fytili, D., & Zabaniotou, A. (2008) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.014 · Cited by 1,457
Current state of sludge production, management, treatment and disposal in China
Yang, G., Zhang, G., & Wang, H. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.002 · Cited by 1,109
Kelessidis, A., & Stasinakis, A. S. (2012) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.012 · Cited by 1,074
Current status of urban wastewater treatment plants in China
Zhang, Q. H., Yang, W. N., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W. S., Jin, P. K., Dzakpasu, M., Yang, S. J., Wang, Q., Wang, X. C., & Ao, D. (2016) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.024 · Cited by 620
Wainaina, S., Awasthi, M. K., Sarsaiya, S., Chen, H., Singh, E., Kumar, A., Ravindran, B., Awasthi, S. K., Liu, T., Duan, Y., et al. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122778 · Cited by 541
Samolada, M. C., & Zabaniotou, A. A. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.11.003 · Cited by 537
The presence of contaminations in sewage sludge – The current situation
Fijalkowski, K., Rorat, A., Grobelak, A., & Kacprzak, M. J. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.068 · Cited by 514
Current state of sewage treatment in China
Jin, L., Zhang, G., & Tian, H. (2014) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.014 · Cited by 511
Sun, Y., Chen, Z., Wu, G., Wu, Q., Zhang, F., Niu, Z., & Hu, H.-Y. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.068 · Cited by 433
Wang, Q., Wu, S.-D., Zeng, Y.-E., & Wu, B.-W. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.090 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Wei, L., Zhu, F., Li, Q., Xue, C., Xia, X., Yu, H., Zhao, Q., Jiang, J., & Bai, S.
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 144
- Pages
- 106093
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3082119798
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 31.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development, current state and future trends of sludge management in China: Based on exploratory data and CO2-equivaient emissions analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106093
- The paper
- Wei, L., Zhu, F., Li, Q., Xue, C., Xia, X., Yu, H., Zhao, Q., Jiang, J., & Bai, S. (2020). Development, current state and future trends of sludge management in China: Based on exploratory data and CO2-equivaient emissions analysis. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.