Environmental pollution of electronic waste recycling in India: A critical review
Abstract
The rapid growth of the production of electrical and electronic products has meant an equally rapid growth in the amount of electronic waste (e-waste), much of which is illegally imported to India, for disposal presenting a serious environmental challenge. The environmental impact during e-waste recycling was investigated and metal as well as other pollutants [e.g. polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)] were found in excessive levels in soil, water and other habitats. The most e-waste is dealt with as general or crudely often by open burning, acid baths, with recovery of only a few materials of value. As resulted of these process; dioxins, furans, and heavy metals are released and harmful to the surrounding environment, engaged workers, and also residents inhabiting near the sites. The informal e-waste sectors are growing rapidly in the developing countries over than in the developed countries because of cheapest labor cost and week legislations systems. It has been confirmed that contaminates are moving through the food chain via root plant translocation system, to the human body thereby threatening human health. We have suggested some possible solution toward in which plants and microbes combine to remediate highly contaminated sites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Open burning for metal extraction in e-waste recycling in Thailand, Vietnam, India, and China emits hazardous compounds such as lead, cadmium, mercury, PCBs, and PCDDs/PCDFs.
“Cases from countries such as Thailand [35], Vietnam [36,37], India [38], and China [39] have shown that an important threat arises from the practice of open burning employed for metal extraction, which results in the emission of hazardous compounds, such as lead, cadmium, mercury, as well as organic pollutants like PCBs and PCDDs/PCDFs.”
From Unveiling Environmental Potential in Smartphone Repair Practices in Vientiane Capital, Laos (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 134 · Cited by 375
- Authors
- Awasthi, A. K., Zeng, X., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Jinhui
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 211
- Pages
- 259-270
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2234800122
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 134
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Technologies R&D Program (2014BAC03B04)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (21177069, 71373141)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Keywords
- electronic waste, e-waste recycling, informal recycling sector, heavy metals, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins and furans, open burning, acid bath, soil and water contamination, food chain contamination, human health risk, phytoremediation, microbial bioremediation, India
- MeSH terms
- Dioxins, Electronics, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollution, Humans, India, Plants, Polychlorinated Biphenyls, Soil, Metals, Heavy, Halogenated Diphenyl Ethers, Recycling, Electronic Waste
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review