The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Short-term and long-term exposures to fine particulate matter constituents and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fine particulate matter (Particulate matter with diameter ≤ 2.5 μm) is associated with multiple health outcomes, with varying effects across seasons and locations. It remains largely unknown that which components of PM2.5 are most harmful to human health. METHODS We systematically searched all the relevent studies published before August 1, 2018, on the associations of fine particulate matter constituents with mortality and morbidity, using Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE. Studies were included if they explored the associations between short term or long term exposure of fine particulate matter constituents and natural, cardiovascular or respiratory health endpoints. The criteria for the risk of bias was adapted from OHAT and New Castle Ottawa. We applied a random-effects model to derive the risk estimates for each constituent. We performed main analyses restricted to studies which adjusted the PM2.5 mass in their models. RESULTS Significant associations were observed between several PM2.5 constituents and different health endpoints. Among them, black carbon and organic carbon were most robustly and consistently associated with all natural, cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Other potential toxic constituents including nitrate, sulfate, Zinc, silicon, iron, nickel, vanadium, and potassium were associated with adverse cardiovascular health, while nitrate, sulfate and vanadium were relevant for adverse respiratory health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis suggests that black carbon and organic carbon are important detrimental components of PM2.5, while other constituents are probably hazardous to human health. However, more studies are needed to further confirm our results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fussell, J. C., Franklin, M., Green, D. C., Gustafsson, M., Harrison, R. M., Hicks, W., Kelly, F. J., Kishta, F., Miller, M. R., Mudway, I. S., et al. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c01072 · Cited by 466
Stafoggia, M., Oftedal, B., Chen, J., Rodopoulou, S., Renzi, M., Atkinson, R. W., Bauwelinck, M., Klompmaker, J. O., Mehta, A., Vienneau, D., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00277-1 · Cited by 366
Shi, L., Zhu, Q., Wang, Y., Hao, H., Zhang, H., Schwartz, J., Amini, H., van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Steenland, K., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2211282119 · Cited by 145
Effects of PM2.5 and its constituents on hemoglobin during the third trimester in pregnant women
Xie, G., Yue, J., Yang, W., Yang, L., Xu, M., Sun, L., Zhang, B., Guo, L., & Chung, M. C. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-18693-2 · Cited by 34
Rodopoulou, S., Stafoggia, M., Chen, J., de Hoogh, K., Bauwelinck, M., Mehta, A. J., Klompmaker, J. O., Oftedal, B., Vienneau, D., Janssen, N. A. H., et al. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152205 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Y., Ruan, Z., Wang, X., Yang, Y., Mason, T. G., Lin, H., & Tian, L.
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 247
- Pages
- 874-882
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2906461844
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short-term and long-term exposures to fine particulate matter constituents and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.060
- The paper
- Yang, Y., Ruan, Z., Wang, X., Yang, Y., Mason, T. G., Lin, H., & Tian, L. (2019). Short-term and long-term exposures to fine particulate matter constituents and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental Pollution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.