The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of various approaches to predict cadmium bioavailability to rice grown in soils with high geochemical background in the karst region, Southwestern China
Abstract
Evaluating the bioavailability of Cd to rice (Oryza sativa L.) was essential in the karst region, Southwestern China, where the soils have previously been shown to be anomalously enriched in Cd through geogenic processes. In this research, we examined the bioavailability of Cd to rice samples collected from 278 sites in Guangxi province, where rice is the most widely cultivated cereal crop that is responsible for the largest human dietary exposure to Cd. Both soil chemical extraction and soil-plant transfer modelling approaches were used to predict the bioavailability to rice. Some of the soil types were highly enriched in Cd, but their bioavailability was low, since the soil carbonates raised soil pH and remarkably reduced Cd bioavailability. In contrast, acidic soils (Ca was largely leached) with relatively low total Cd, the grown rice plants accumulated higher Cd in their grains. Results from CaCl2 extraction experiments provided good predictions for Cd in rice grain grown in soils of different types. Stepwise multiple regressions revealed soil pH and soil Ca content were the dominant factors that control the transfer of Cd from soil to rice. An extended Freundlich-type model and a polynomial surface model provided good prediction for Cd in rice grains. The diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) technique gave the best estimation of soil Cd bioavailability, whereas water-extracted soil solution Cd provided relatively poor fits. Regional soil threshold that derived using the models, can avoid exceedance of Cd in rice and thereby enable local agricultural practitioners or authorities to develop appropriate management for croplands with high Cd background.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, C., Li, W., Yang, Z., Chen, Y., Shao, W., & Ji, J. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep12735 · Cited by 131
Self-citation
Cited by
Li, Z., Liang, Y., Hu, H., Shaheen, S. M., Zhong, H., Tack, F. M. G., Wu, M., Li, Y.-F., Gao, Y., Rinklebe, J., et al. (2021) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106749 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Wen, Y., Li, W., Yang, Z., Zhuo, X., Guan, D.-X., Song, Y., Guo, C., & Ji, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 258
- Pages
- 113645
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2990453488
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of various approaches to predict cadmium bioavailability to rice grown in soils with high geochemical background in the karst region, Southwestern China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113645
- The paper
- Wen, Y., Li, W., Yang, Z., Zhuo, X., Guan, D.-X., Song, Y., Guo, C., & Ji, J. (2020). Evaluation of various approaches to predict cadmium bioavailability to rice grown in soils with high geochemical background in the karst region, Southwestern China. Environmental Pollution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113645
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.