Cited by 93Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry StudiesHeavy metals in environment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 137 of the 137 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phytoremediation of polluted soils and waters by native Qatari plants: Future perspectives

Open access
Al-Thani, R.F., Yasseen, B.T.·2020·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Because pollution is predicted to worsen and sources of quality water for agriculture and other human activities are limited, many countries have been motivated to seek novel water sources. Qatar relies on groundwater and water desalinization to meet its water needs, and additional water resources will be needed to avoid unexpected crises in the future. Industrial wastewater (IWW) is an alternative water source, and much research activities should be focused on developing innovative and contemporary approaches to removing pollutants from IWW. Phytoremediation methods, shown to be efficient methods of removing and degrading contaminants of various kinds from polluted waters and soils, require knowledge of the native plants and associated microorganisms. In Qatar, many native plants (monocot and dicot, indigenous or introduced) have been shown to be greatly effective in remediating polluted areas. This article is a guide for Qatari scientists aiming to identify promising native plants and associated microbes for IWW phytoremediation. In it, we review the basic components of bioremediation and summarize the principle phytoremediation approaches and preferred recycling options. The multiple mechanisms and methods of phytoremediation for cleansing polluted soils and waters are also discussed as are details of the metabolic reactions degrading the organic components of oil and gas. Finally, heavy metal accumulation is addressed. Wastewater from industrial and domestic activities is currently being used to create green areas around Doha, Qatar, and such areas could be at risk of contamination. Many native Qatari plants and soil-dwelling microbes are efficient at removing organic and inorganic contaminants from polluted soils and waters, and some are promising candidates for achieving a clean environment free of contaminants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113694

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phytoremediation has been applied worldwide because of its versatility and effectiveness in cleaning contaminated soil and water, and its success largely depends on the nature of the pollutants present.

    “Phytoremediation has been applied worldwide because of its versatility and effectiveness in the cleanup of contaminated soil and water (Edgar et al. 2021).”

    From Sustainable management of post-phytoremediation biomass (2025) · cites this paper as Al-Thani &Yasseen, 2020

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says plants can remove or degrade various contaminants from polluted soil and water, and Section 4 describes several phytoremediation mechanisms. The concluding remarks (page unavailable) identify pollutant composition as one of several factors affecting remediation, but the copy does not establish worldwide application because of versatility and effectiveness, or that success depends largely on pollutant type. The printed sentence cites Edgar et al. (2021), not this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Al-Sharafi, 2001, Wastewater treatment and reuse in the state of Qatar, vol. 2, 555
  2. Bu-Olayan, 2010, Accumulation and translocation of trace metals in Halodule uninervis, in the Kuwait coast, Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia, 7
  3. Jadia, 2008, Phytotoxicity and remediation of heavy metals by alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in soil-vermicompost media, Adv. Nat. Appl. Sci., 2, 141
  4. Kavitha, 2014, Phytoremediation of soil mercury and cadmium by weed plants, Trianthema portulacastrum L., Saccharum spontaneum L. and Ipomoea carnea jacq, Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., 4, 1
  5. Kremer, 2013, Interactions between the plants and microorganisms, Allelopathy J., 31, 51
  6. Mishra, 2016, Phytoremediation of salt-affected soils: a review of processes, applicability, and the impact on soil health in hisar, Haryana, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Inven. Res. Develop., II, 2349
  7. Nasher, 1997, Prevalence of bacteria and parasites in sewage and well water and their possible health hazard, in North of Sana’a, Republic of Yemen, J. Union Arab Biol., Cairo, 7, 217
  8. Nazli Alipour, 2014, Assessing Chenopodium album L. Potential for phytoremediation of lead-polluted soils, Recent Adv. Environ. Sci. Geosci.
  9. Ogunkunle, 2014, Assessing the heavy metal transfer and translocation by Sida acuta and Pennisetum purpureum for phytoremediation purposes, Albanian J. Agric. Sci., 13, 71
  10. Sajad, 2016, Screening of plants for the phytoremediation of zinc from dir lower, khyber pakhunkhwa, pak, J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci. (JBES), 8, 206
  11. Stephen, 2011, Comparison of Glycine max and Sida acuta in the phytoremediation of waste lubricating oil polluted soil, Nat. Sci., 9, 190
  12. Subhashini, 2014, Screening potential of three grass species for phytoremediation of heavy metals, Euro. Acad. Res. II, 5887
  13. Tandon, 2014, Enhancement in phytoremediation of municipal wastewater by genetically modifying wetland and non-wetland plant species (non-edible), G.J.B.B., 3, 359
  14. Waoo, 2014, Evaluation of phytoremediation potential of Datura inoxia for heavy metals in an industrially polluted area in Bhopal, India, Int. J. Futur. Trends Eng. Technol., 2, 16
  15. Yasseen, 2001, Preliminary assessment of pollution due to faulty sewage system in north of Sana,a, Republic of Yemen, Dirasat, Eng. Sci., 28, 89

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Al-Thani, R. F., & Yasseen, B. T.
Affiliations
Qatar University (QA)
Corresponding author
Yasseen, B.T.
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
259
Pages
113694
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995956173
Cited by
93
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
phytoremediation, industrial wastewater, soil contamination, water pollution, heavy metal accumulation, bioremediation, wastewater recycling
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Humans, Plants, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review