The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of microplastics in surface water and Australian freshwater shrimp Paratya australiensis in Victoria, Australia
Open accessAbstract
Compared to marine microplastics research, few studies have bio-monitored microplastics in inland waters. It is also important to understand the microplastics' uptake and their potential risks to freshwater species. The Australian glass shrimp Paratya australiensis (Family: Atyidae) is commonly found in fresh waterbodies in eastern Australia, and are sensitive to anthropogenic stressors but have a wide tolerance range to the natural environmental conditions. This study aimed to understand the microplastics' occurrence and types in water samples and the shrimp P. australiensis, and identify if the shrimp could be a suitable bioindicator for microplastic pollution. Surface water and P. australiensis across ten urban and rural freshwater sites in Victoria were sampled. In total, 30 water samples and 100 shrimp were analysed for microplastic content, and shrimp body weights and sizes were also recorded. Microplastics were picked, photographed and identified using FT-IR microscopy: in water samples, 57.9% of items including suspect items were selected to identify; all microplastics found in shrimp samples were identified. Microplastics were present in the surface waters of all sites, with an average abundance of 0.40 ± 0.27 items/L. A total of 36% of shrimp contained microplastics with an average of 0.52 ± 0.55 items/ind (24 ± 31 items/g). Fibre was the most common shape, and blue was the most frequent colour in both water and shrimp samples. The dominant plastic types were polyester in water samples, and rayon in shrimp samples. Even though results from this study show a relatively low concentration of microplastics in water samples in comparison with global studies, it is worth noticing that microplastics were regularly detected in fresh waterbodies in Victoria, Australia. Compared with water samples, shrimp contained a wider variety of plastic types, suggesting they may potentially behave as passive samplers of microplastics pollution in freshwater environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plastic debris in the open ocean
Cózar, A., Echevarría, F., González-Gordillo, J. I., Irigoien, X., Úbeda, B., Hernández-León, S., Palma, Á. T., Navarro, S., García-de-Lomas, J., Ruiz, A., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1314705111 · Cited by 3,133
Turning microplastics into nanoplastics through digestive fragmentation by Antarctic krill
Dawson, A. L., Kawaguchi, S., King, C. K., Townsend, K. A., King, R., Huston, W. M., & Bengtson Nash, S. M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03465-9 · Cited by 1,023
Weinstein, J. E., Crocker, B. K., & Gray, A. D. (2016) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.3432 · Cited by 553 · cited 1×
“Larger plastic pieces are unable to break down into smaller parts in a short period of time in the environment (Weinstein et al., 2016), and are unlikely to be ingested by macroinvertebrates due to their larger sizes, so we may not be able to find a lot of pellets, films and fragments in macroinvertebrates.”
BackgroundChua, E. M., Shimeta, J., Nugegoda, D., Morrison, P. D., & Clarke, B. O. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es405717z · Cited by 494
Cited by
Lapointe, M., Farner, J. M., Hernandez, L. M., & Tufenkji, N. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c00712 · Cited by 470
A Review: Research Progress on Microplastic Pollutants in Aquatic Environments
Tang, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, W., Zhao, J., He, S., Yang, C., Zhang, T., Tang, C., Zhang, C., et al. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142572 · Cited by 433
Napper, I. E., Baroth, A., Barrett, A. C., Bhola, S., Chowdhury, G. W., Davies, B. F. R., Duncan, E. M., Kumar, S., Nelms, S. E., Hasan Niloy, M. N., et al. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116348 · Cited by 404
Separation, characterization and identification of microplastics and nanoplastics in the environment
Fu, W., Min, J., Jiang, W., Li, Y., & Zhang, W. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137561 · Cited by 361
Microplastics in Food: A Review on Analytical Methods and Challenges
Kwon, J.-H., Kim, J.-W., Pham, T. D., Tarafdar, A., Hong, S., Chun, S.-H., Lee, S.-H., Kang, D.-Y., Kim, J.-Y., Kim, S.-B., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17186710 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Nan, B., Su, L., Kellar, C., Craig, N. J., Keough, M. J., & Pettigrove, V.
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 259
- Pages
- 113865
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2997129550
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of microplastics in surface water and Australian freshwater shrimp Paratya australiensis in Victoria, Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113865
- The paper
- Nan, B., Su, L., Kellar, C., Craig, N. J., Keough, M. J., & Pettigrove, V. (2020). Identification of microplastics in surface water and Australian freshwater shrimp Paratya australiensis in Victoria, Australia. Environmental Pollution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113865
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.