Cited by 308Microplastics and Plastic PollutionAnalytical chemistry methods developmentPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Microplastics in Food: A Review on Analytical Methods and Challenges

Open access
Kwon, Jung-Hwan, Kim, Jin-Woo, Pham, Thanh Dat, Tarafdar, Abhrajyoti, Hong, Soonki, Chun, Sa-Ho, Lee, Sang-Hwa, Kang, Da-Young +3 more·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Human exposure to microplastics contained in food has become a significant concern owing to the increasing accumulation of microplastics in the environment. In this paper, we summarize the presence of microplastics in food and the analytical methods used for isolation and identification of microplastics. Although a large number of studies on seafood such as fish and shellfish exist, estimating the overall human exposure to microplastics via food consumption is difficult owing to the lack of studies on other food items. Analytical methods still need to be optimized for appropriate recovery of microplastics in various food matrices, rendering a quantitative comparison of different studies challenging. In addition, microplastics could be added or removed from ingredients during processing or cooking. Thus, research on processed food is crucial to estimate the contribution of food to overall human microplastic consumption and to mitigate this exposure in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17186710

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies looking at environmental samples are constrained by methods that detect larger particles (e.g., LODs of spectroscopy are generally >10μm), while many laboratory studies testing effects look at smaller particles.

    “most studies looking at environmental samples are constrained by methods that detect larger particles (e.g., LODs of spectroscopy are generally >10μm),71 many laboratory studies testing effects look at smaller particles.72”

    From Microplastics and Anthropogenic Particles in Recreationally Caught Freshwater Fish from an Urbanized Region of the North American Great Lakes (2024) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Discussion (§4.1) says the predominant FT-IR and Raman methods can confirm microplastics only above 10 μm, supporting the detection-limit point. The review concerns microplastics in food, however, so it does not establish that most studies of environmental samples generally face this constraint. The separate claim about laboratory effects studies is attached to citation 72, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [63]Ogonowski M. Wenman V. Danielsson S. Gorokhova E. Ingested microplastic is not correlated to HOC concentrations in Baltic Sea herring Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Rhodes, Greece 31 August–2 September 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwon, J.-H., Kim, J.-W., Pham, T. D., Tarafdar, A., Hong, S., Chun, S.-H., Lee, S.-H., Kang, D.-Y., Kim, J.-Y., Kim, S.-B., & Jung, J.
Affiliations
  • Korea University (KR)
  • Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
  • FITI Testing & Research Institute, Cheongju 28116, Korea
  • Korea Institute of Analytical Science and Technology, Seoul 04790, Korea
Corresponding author
Kwon, Jung-Hwan
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-09-15
Volume
17
Issue
18
Pages
6710
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3084664411
Cited by
308
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (20162MFDS029)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
microplastics, food contamination, human exposure, seafood, analytical methods, food processing, cooking, processed foods
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Animals, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Plastics, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Seafood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review