Upcycling of waste polyethylene terephthalate plastic bottles into porous carbon for CF4 adsorption
Abstract
Thermo-chemical processes for converting plastic wastes into useful materials are considered promising technologies to mitigate the environmental pollution caused by plastic wastes. In this study, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic wastes were used to develop cost-effective and value-added porous carbons; the developed porous carbons were subsequently tested for capturing CF 4, a greenhouse gas with a high global-warming potential. The activation temperature was varied from 600 °C to 1000 °C and the mass ratio of KOH/carbon ranged from 1 to 3 in the preparation process and their effects on the textural properties and CF 4-capture performance of the PET plastic waste-derived porous carbons were investigated. The CF 4-adsorption uptake was dictated by the specific surface area and pore volume of narrow micropores less than 0.9 nm in diameter. PET-K(2)700, which was developed by KOH activation at 700 °C and KOH/carbon mass ratio of 2, showed the highest CF 4-adsorption uptake of 2.43 mmol g-1 at 25 °C and 1 atm. Also, the CF 4-adsorption data were fitted well with the Langmuir isotherm model and pseudo second-order kinetic model. The PET plastic waste-derived porous carbons exhibited a high CF 4 uptake, good CF 4/N 2 selectivity at relatively low CF 4 pressures, easy regeneration, rapid adsorption/desorption kinetics, and excellent recyclability, which are promising for practical CF 4-capture applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Direct pyrolysis of PET at 600 °C for 1 h under nitrogen yields a porous carbon that, after activation, exhibits good selectivity and regenerability in carbon tetrafluoride (CF4) adsorption.
“Direct pyrolysis at 600 °C for 1 h under a nitrogen atmosphere yielded a porous carbon, which, after activation treatment, exhibited good selectivity and regenerability in carbon tetrafluoride (CF 4 ) adsorption.”
From Functional carbon materials from waste plastics: synthesis and applications (2025) · cites this paper as [64]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Yuan, X., Cho, M.-K., Lee, J. G., Choi, S. W., & Lee, K. B.
- Affiliations
- Korea University (KR)
- Research Institute of Industrial Science and Technology (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Ki Bong
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 265
- Issue
- Pt A
- Pages
- 114868
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3027605019
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1A2C2010815, NRF-2018M3D3A1A01055761)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Covalent Organic Framework Applications
- Keywords
- polyethylene terephthalate, plastic waste upcycling, porous carbon, CO2 capture, greenhouse gas capture, KOH activation, activation temperature, micropores, specific surface area, adsorption kinetics, Langmuir isotherm, adsorbent regeneration, plastic waste valorization
- MeSH terms
- Adsorption, Carbon, Kinetics, Polyethylene Terephthalates, Porosity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review