Cited by 30Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

A Simple and Rapid Algal Assay Kit to Assess Toxicity of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Water

Eom, Heonseop, Park, Minseung, Jang, Am, Kim, Seunggyu, Oh, Sang-Eun·2021·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

This study presents a novel algal-based toxicity test suitable for simple and rapid assessment of heavy metal (Hg2+, Cr6+, Cd2+, Pb2+, or As3+)-contaminated water. A closed-system kit-type algal assay was developed using Chlorella vulgaris. Toxicity was assessed by oxygen evolution in the gaseous phase of the assay kits, which was measured via a needle-type oxygen sensor. Initial cell density, light intensity, and exposure time that enabled favorable test performance for the algal assay kits were 103 cells/mL, 250 μmol m-2s-1, and 18 h, respectively. Results from the heavy metal toxicity tests demonstrate that Hg2+, Cr6+, Cd2+, and Pb2+ are more toxic in inhibiting algal photosynthetic activity than As3+. The 18 h half-maximum effective concentrations (EC50) for Hg2+, Cr6+, Cd2+, Pb2+, and As3+ were determined to be 31.3 ± 0.5, 179.6 ± 7.5, 301.3 ± 6.1, 476.1 ± 10.5, and 2184.1 ± 31.1 μg/L, respectively. A strong correlation between oxygen concentrations in the headspace of the assay kits and chlorophyll a production indicates that oxygen evolution in the gaseous phase is able to represent algal photosynthetic activity and serve as the end-point in algal toxicity tests. High test sensitivity and reproducibility as well as an easy test protocol and rapid processing time make the algal assay kit a suitable tool for simple and rapid toxicity testing of heavy metal-contaminated water.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116135

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The measurement of mercury content in algae food has evolved from original chemical methods to rapid determination methods, including a rapid detection kit for heavy metal-polluted water and a rapid method for mercury in spirulina health food.

    “In terms of algal food safety testing technology, the measurement of mercury content in algae food from the original chemical method to the present rapid determination, for example, a simple and rapid detection kit for the toxicity of heavy metal-polluted water [96] and a method for the rapid determination of mercury content in spirulina health food, were established (Table 2).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 87 · Cited by 30

Authors
Eom, H., Park, M., Jang, A., Kim, S., & Oh, S.-E.
Affiliations
  • Kangwon National University (KR)
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Corresponding author
Oh, Sang-Eun
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
269
Pages
116135
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110017545
Cited by
30
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Environment
  • Ministry of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
heavy metal contamination, Chlorella vulgaris, oxygen evolution reaction, headspace gas analysis, photosynthesis inhibition, mercury, hexavalent chromium, cadmium, lead, arsenic, EC50, contaminated water
MeSH terms
Chlorophyll A, Water, Reproducibility of Results, Metals, Heavy, Chlorella vulgaris

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review