Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soil contamination and sources of phthalates and its health risk in China: A review

Lü, Huixiong, Mo, Ce-Hui, Zhao, Hai-Ming, Xiang, Lei, Katsoyiannis, Athanasios, Li, Yan-Wen, Cai, Quan-Ying, Wong, Ming-Hung·2018·Environmental Research

Abstract

&NA; Phthalates (PAEs) are extensively used as plasticizers and constitute one of the most frequently detected organic contaminants in the environment. With the deterioration of eco‐environment in China during the past three decades, many studies on PAE occurrence in soils and their risk assessments have been conducted which allow us to carry out a fairly comprehensive assessment of soil PAE contamination on a nation‐wide scale. This review combines the updated information available associated with PAE current levels, distribution patterns (including urban soil, rural or agricultural soil, seasonal and vertical variations), potential sources, and human health exposure. The levels of PAEs in soils of China are generally at the high end of the global range, and higher than the grade II limits of the Environmental Quality Standard for soil in China. The most abundant compounds, di‐n‐butyl phthalate (DBP) and di‐(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), display obvious spatial distribution in different provinces. It is noted that urbanization and industrialization, application of plastic film (especially plastic film mulching in agricultural soil) and fertilizer are the major sources of PAEs in soil. Uptake of PAEs by crops, and human exposure to PAEs via ingestion of soil and vegetables are reviewed, with scientific gaps highlighted. Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available. HighlightsPAE levels in soils of China were generally higher than the other countries.DBP and DEHP are the dominant compounds in soil with obvious spatial distribution.Urbanization and industrialization, application of plastic film and fertilizer are the major sources of PAEs in soil.Uptake of PAEs by crops and human exposure to PAEs are reviewed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2018.03.013

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 69 references

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Lü, H., Mo, C.-H., Zhao, H.-M., Xiang, L., Katsoyiannis, A., Li, Y.-W., Cai, Q.-Y., & Wong, M.-H.
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
164
Pages
417-429
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791174417
Cited by
382
References
69
FWCI
15.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil contamination and sources of phthalates and its health risk in China: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envres.2018.03.013
The paper
Lü, H., Mo, C.-H., Zhao, H.-M., Xiang, L., Katsoyiannis, A., Li, Y.-W., Cai, Q.-Y., & Wong, M.-H. (2018). Soil contamination and sources of phthalates and its health risk in China: A review. Environmental Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.03.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.