Cited by 85Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Comparison of Adsorption Properties for Cadmium Removal from Aqueous Solution by Enteromorpha Prolifera Biochar Modified with Different Chemical Reagents

Li, Xiangping, Wang, Chuanbin, Tian, Jingnan, Liu, Juping, Chen, Guanyi·2020·Environmental Research

Abstract

Using biochar to remove heavy metals from water is environmentally beneficial. In this study, three kinds of chemical reagents, including ZnCl 2, H 3 PO 4 and KMnO 4, were introduced to modify the biochar derived from Enteromorpha prolifera. The performance of these modified biochar in removing Cadmium ions (Cd(II)) from water was investigated. The physicochemical properties of activated biochars were characterized by N 2-sorption, thermal gravity and differential thermal gravity (TG/DTG), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), elemental analysis and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The results showed that the removal rate of Cd(II) from water by EP biochar modified with H 3 PO 4 was significantly increased, and the maximum adsorption capacity of Cd(II) reached to 423 mg/g for PBC. Moreover, the adsorption of Cd(II) from water by phosphoric acid modified biochar was very fast, and the saturation adsorption of Cd(II) was reached within 1 h. Compared with pseudo first-order model, pseudo secondary-order model was much more suitable for analyzing the adsorption kinetics data of Cd(II) onto KBC or ZBC. The adsorption of Cd(II) onto PBC was analyzed by the intra-particle diffusion kinetic model, where the value of R 2 was high as 0.98. The Langmuir model was fit for phosphoric acid modified biochar.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109502

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 85

Authors
Li, X., Wang, C., Tian, J., Liu, J., & Chen, G.
Affiliations
Tianjin University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Xiangping
  • Chen, Guanyi
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
186
Pages
109502
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3017153050
Cited by
85
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Tianjin Science and Technology Committee
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
cadmium removal, Enteromorpha prolifera, biochar, heavy metal adsorption, biochar modification, phosphoric acid modification, potassium permanganate modification, adsorption kinetics, adsorption isotherms, Langmuir isotherm, pseudo-second-order kinetics, intraparticle diffusion
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Cadmium, Charcoal, Kinetics, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review